Differences in referral rates to specialised health care from four primary health care models in Klaipeda, Lithuania

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Lithuanian primary health care (PHC) is undergoing changes from the systems prevalent under the Soviet Union, which ensured free access to specialised health care. Currently four different PHC models work in parallel, which offers th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ovhed Ingvar, Jurgutis Arnoldas, Håkansson Anders, Zielinski Andrzej, Halling Anders
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-11-01
Series:BMC Family Practice
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/9/63
_version_ 1811330279268155392
author Ovhed Ingvar
Jurgutis Arnoldas
Håkansson Anders
Zielinski Andrzej
Halling Anders
author_facet Ovhed Ingvar
Jurgutis Arnoldas
Håkansson Anders
Zielinski Andrzej
Halling Anders
author_sort Ovhed Ingvar
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Lithuanian primary health care (PHC) is undergoing changes from the systems prevalent under the Soviet Union, which ensured free access to specialised health care. Currently four different PHC models work in parallel, which offers the opportunity to study their respective effect on referral rates. Our aim was to investigate whether there were differences in referrals rates from different Lithuanian PHC models in Klaipeda after adjustment for co-morbidity.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The population listed with 18 PHC practices serving inhabitants in Klaipeda city and region (250 070 inhabitants). Four PHC models: rural state-owned family medicine practices, urban privately owned family medicine practices, state-owned polyclinics and privately owned polyclinics. Information on listed patients and referrals during 2005 from each PHC practice in Klaipeda was obtained from the Lithuanian State Sickness Fund database. The database records included information on age, gender, PHC model, referrals and ICD 10 diagnoses. The Johns Hopkins ACG Case-Mix system was used to study co-morbidity. Referral rates from different PHC models were studied using Poisson regression models.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Patients listed with rural state-owned family medicine practices had a significantly lower referral rate to specialised health care than those in the other three PHC models. An increasing co-morbidity level correlated with a higher physician- to self-referral ratio.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Family medicine practices located in rural-, but not in urban areas had significantly lower referral rates to specialised health care. It could not be established whether this was due to organisation, training of physicians or financing, but suggests there is room for improving primary health care in urban areas. Patient's place of residence and co morbidity level were the most important factors for referral rate. We also found that gatekeeping had an effect on the referral pattern with respect to co-morbidity level, so that those with a physician referral were more likely to have had higher co-morbidity.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T15:59:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d86644599d845da8211a236bd1575fa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2296
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T15:59:39Z
publishDate 2008-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Family Practice
spelling doaj.art-8d86644599d845da8211a236bd1575fa2022-12-22T02:40:35ZengBMCBMC Family Practice1471-22962008-11-01916310.1186/1471-2296-9-63Differences in referral rates to specialised health care from four primary health care models in Klaipeda, LithuaniaOvhed IngvarJurgutis ArnoldasHåkansson AndersZielinski AndrzejHalling Anders<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Lithuanian primary health care (PHC) is undergoing changes from the systems prevalent under the Soviet Union, which ensured free access to specialised health care. Currently four different PHC models work in parallel, which offers the opportunity to study their respective effect on referral rates. Our aim was to investigate whether there were differences in referrals rates from different Lithuanian PHC models in Klaipeda after adjustment for co-morbidity.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The population listed with 18 PHC practices serving inhabitants in Klaipeda city and region (250 070 inhabitants). Four PHC models: rural state-owned family medicine practices, urban privately owned family medicine practices, state-owned polyclinics and privately owned polyclinics. Information on listed patients and referrals during 2005 from each PHC practice in Klaipeda was obtained from the Lithuanian State Sickness Fund database. The database records included information on age, gender, PHC model, referrals and ICD 10 diagnoses. The Johns Hopkins ACG Case-Mix system was used to study co-morbidity. Referral rates from different PHC models were studied using Poisson regression models.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Patients listed with rural state-owned family medicine practices had a significantly lower referral rate to specialised health care than those in the other three PHC models. An increasing co-morbidity level correlated with a higher physician- to self-referral ratio.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Family medicine practices located in rural-, but not in urban areas had significantly lower referral rates to specialised health care. It could not be established whether this was due to organisation, training of physicians or financing, but suggests there is room for improving primary health care in urban areas. Patient's place of residence and co morbidity level were the most important factors for referral rate. We also found that gatekeeping had an effect on the referral pattern with respect to co-morbidity level, so that those with a physician referral were more likely to have had higher co-morbidity.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/9/63
spellingShingle Ovhed Ingvar
Jurgutis Arnoldas
Håkansson Anders
Zielinski Andrzej
Halling Anders
Differences in referral rates to specialised health care from four primary health care models in Klaipeda, Lithuania
BMC Family Practice
title Differences in referral rates to specialised health care from four primary health care models in Klaipeda, Lithuania
title_full Differences in referral rates to specialised health care from four primary health care models in Klaipeda, Lithuania
title_fullStr Differences in referral rates to specialised health care from four primary health care models in Klaipeda, Lithuania
title_full_unstemmed Differences in referral rates to specialised health care from four primary health care models in Klaipeda, Lithuania
title_short Differences in referral rates to specialised health care from four primary health care models in Klaipeda, Lithuania
title_sort differences in referral rates to specialised health care from four primary health care models in klaipeda lithuania
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/9/63
work_keys_str_mv AT ovhedingvar differencesinreferralratestospecialisedhealthcarefromfourprimaryhealthcaremodelsinklaipedalithuania
AT jurgutisarnoldas differencesinreferralratestospecialisedhealthcarefromfourprimaryhealthcaremodelsinklaipedalithuania
AT hakanssonanders differencesinreferralratestospecialisedhealthcarefromfourprimaryhealthcaremodelsinklaipedalithuania
AT zielinskiandrzej differencesinreferralratestospecialisedhealthcarefromfourprimaryhealthcaremodelsinklaipedalithuania
AT hallinganders differencesinreferralratestospecialisedhealthcarefromfourprimaryhealthcaremodelsinklaipedalithuania