Predictors of positive outcomes from ‘Early Intervention in Psychosis’: protocol for a national retrospective cohort study

BackgroundPsychotic disorders are severe and prevalent mental health conditions associated with long-term disability, reduced quality of life, and substantial economic costs. Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services aim to provide timely and comprehensive treatment for psychotic disorders, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryan Williams, Ed Penington, Veenu Gupta, Apostolos Tsiachristas, Paul French, Belinda Lennox, Alex Bottle, Mike J. Crawford
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1274820/full
_version_ 1797639935442812928
author Ryan Williams
Ryan Williams
Ed Penington
Veenu Gupta
Apostolos Tsiachristas
Paul French
Belinda Lennox
Alex Bottle
Mike J. Crawford
author_facet Ryan Williams
Ryan Williams
Ed Penington
Veenu Gupta
Apostolos Tsiachristas
Paul French
Belinda Lennox
Alex Bottle
Mike J. Crawford
author_sort Ryan Williams
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundPsychotic disorders are severe and prevalent mental health conditions associated with long-term disability, reduced quality of life, and substantial economic costs. Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services aim to provide timely and comprehensive treatment for psychotic disorders, and EIP service input is associated with improved outcomes. However, there is limited understanding of the specific components of EIP care that contribute to these improvements. There is significant nationwide variability in the commissioning and delivery of EIP, with individuals receiving different packages of components from different services. In this study, we seek to explore associations between EIP components and clinically significant outcomes, in order to understand the mechanisms underlying improved psychosis care.MethodsThis national retrospective cohort study will utilize data from the 2019 National Clinical Audit of Psychosis (NCAP), examining the care received by 10,560 individuals treated by EIP services in England. Exposure data from the NCAP, capturing the components of care delivered by EIP services, will be linked with outcome data from routine NHS Digital datasets over a three-year follow-up period. This will be the first study to use this method to examine this population in England. The primary outcomes will be surrogate measures of relapse of psychosis (hospital admission and referral to community-based crisis intervention services). Secondary outcomes include duration of admissions, emergency hospital attendances, episodes of detention under the Mental Health Act, and all-cause mortality. We will use multilevel regression to examine associations between exposures and outcome events. We will handle missing data using appropriate imputation techniques.DiscussionThis study aims to provide valuable insights into the long-term effects of variations in EIP service delivery. The study involves a large, diverse cohort including individuals treated by every EIP service in England. While there are limitations inherent in the observational nature of the study, any associations identified will be of great relevance to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers seeking to optimize EIP care. The results will enable more targeted treatment planning, resource allocation, and potential innovations in EIP care, ultimately leading to improved prognoses for people experiencing psychosis.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T13:24:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d86bebf11274fb189c0a571406d0612
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-0640
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T13:24:39Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-8d86bebf11274fb189c0a571406d06122023-11-03T08:41:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402023-11-011410.3389/fpsyt.2023.12748201274820Predictors of positive outcomes from ‘Early Intervention in Psychosis’: protocol for a national retrospective cohort studyRyan Williams0Ryan Williams1Ed Penington2Veenu Gupta3Apostolos Tsiachristas4Paul French5Belinda Lennox6Alex Bottle7Mike J. Crawford8Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United KingdomRoyal College of Psychiatrists, London, United KingdomDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomDepartment of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United KingdomDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomDepartment of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United KingdomDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United KingdomBackgroundPsychotic disorders are severe and prevalent mental health conditions associated with long-term disability, reduced quality of life, and substantial economic costs. Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services aim to provide timely and comprehensive treatment for psychotic disorders, and EIP service input is associated with improved outcomes. However, there is limited understanding of the specific components of EIP care that contribute to these improvements. There is significant nationwide variability in the commissioning and delivery of EIP, with individuals receiving different packages of components from different services. In this study, we seek to explore associations between EIP components and clinically significant outcomes, in order to understand the mechanisms underlying improved psychosis care.MethodsThis national retrospective cohort study will utilize data from the 2019 National Clinical Audit of Psychosis (NCAP), examining the care received by 10,560 individuals treated by EIP services in England. Exposure data from the NCAP, capturing the components of care delivered by EIP services, will be linked with outcome data from routine NHS Digital datasets over a three-year follow-up period. This will be the first study to use this method to examine this population in England. The primary outcomes will be surrogate measures of relapse of psychosis (hospital admission and referral to community-based crisis intervention services). Secondary outcomes include duration of admissions, emergency hospital attendances, episodes of detention under the Mental Health Act, and all-cause mortality. We will use multilevel regression to examine associations between exposures and outcome events. We will handle missing data using appropriate imputation techniques.DiscussionThis study aims to provide valuable insights into the long-term effects of variations in EIP service delivery. The study involves a large, diverse cohort including individuals treated by every EIP service in England. While there are limitations inherent in the observational nature of the study, any associations identified will be of great relevance to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers seeking to optimize EIP care. The results will enable more targeted treatment planning, resource allocation, and potential innovations in EIP care, ultimately leading to improved prognoses for people experiencing psychosis.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1274820/fullearly interventionpsychosisschizophreniafamily therapyCBTpcarer support
spellingShingle Ryan Williams
Ryan Williams
Ed Penington
Veenu Gupta
Apostolos Tsiachristas
Paul French
Belinda Lennox
Alex Bottle
Mike J. Crawford
Predictors of positive outcomes from ‘Early Intervention in Psychosis’: protocol for a national retrospective cohort study
Frontiers in Psychiatry
early intervention
psychosis
schizophrenia
family therapy
CBTp
carer support
title Predictors of positive outcomes from ‘Early Intervention in Psychosis’: protocol for a national retrospective cohort study
title_full Predictors of positive outcomes from ‘Early Intervention in Psychosis’: protocol for a national retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Predictors of positive outcomes from ‘Early Intervention in Psychosis’: protocol for a national retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of positive outcomes from ‘Early Intervention in Psychosis’: protocol for a national retrospective cohort study
title_short Predictors of positive outcomes from ‘Early Intervention in Psychosis’: protocol for a national retrospective cohort study
title_sort predictors of positive outcomes from early intervention in psychosis protocol for a national retrospective cohort study
topic early intervention
psychosis
schizophrenia
family therapy
CBTp
carer support
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1274820/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanwilliams predictorsofpositiveoutcomesfromearlyinterventioninpsychosisprotocolforanationalretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ryanwilliams predictorsofpositiveoutcomesfromearlyinterventioninpsychosisprotocolforanationalretrospectivecohortstudy
AT edpenington predictorsofpositiveoutcomesfromearlyinterventioninpsychosisprotocolforanationalretrospectivecohortstudy
AT veenugupta predictorsofpositiveoutcomesfromearlyinterventioninpsychosisprotocolforanationalretrospectivecohortstudy
AT apostolostsiachristas predictorsofpositiveoutcomesfromearlyinterventioninpsychosisprotocolforanationalretrospectivecohortstudy
AT paulfrench predictorsofpositiveoutcomesfromearlyinterventioninpsychosisprotocolforanationalretrospectivecohortstudy
AT belindalennox predictorsofpositiveoutcomesfromearlyinterventioninpsychosisprotocolforanationalretrospectivecohortstudy
AT alexbottle predictorsofpositiveoutcomesfromearlyinterventioninpsychosisprotocolforanationalretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mikejcrawford predictorsofpositiveoutcomesfromearlyinterventioninpsychosisprotocolforanationalretrospectivecohortstudy