Quality Indicators in Palliative Radiation Oncology: Development and Pilot Testing

Purpose: A quality indicator (QI) is a valuable tool to evaluate the quality of health care systems. In palliative radiation oncology, only a few related QIs have been developed to date. In this study, we sought to develop and pilot test QIs that assess the quality of care in palliative radiation th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tetsuo Saito, MD, PhD, Naoto Shikama, MD, PhD, Takeo Takahashi, MD, PhD, Misako Miwa, MD, PhD, Kazunari Miyazawa, MD, Hitoshi Wada, MD, PhD, Naoki Nakamura, MD, PhD, Atsunori Yorozu, MD, PhD, Hisayasu Nagakura, MD, Mitsunori Miyashita, RN, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-03-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109421002141
Description
Summary:Purpose: A quality indicator (QI) is a valuable tool to evaluate the quality of health care systems. In palliative radiation oncology, only a few related QIs have been developed to date. In this study, we sought to develop and pilot test QIs that assess the quality of care in palliative radiation therapy. Methods and Materials: A modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus with an expert panel. The panel consisted of 8 radiation oncologists who have expertise in palliative radiation oncology and 1 expert on Delphi methodology. Online panel meetings and e-mail surveys were conducted to develop QIs on palliative radiation therapy for bone and brain metastases. Feasibility of measurement was assessed though pilot surveys that were conducted by radiation oncologists at 5 facilities. Results: After 3 online meetings and 2 e-mail surveys, we developed 4 QIs on bone metastases and 3 QIs on brain metastases. Two email surveys and 2 pilot surveys confirmed the validity of QIs and the feasibility of measurement, respectively. Conclusions: We developed valid and feasible QIs on palliative radiation therapy for bone and brain metastases. Our work may contribute to reduce the evidence–practice gaps in palliative radiation oncology.
ISSN:2452-1094