Protection reduces loss of natural land-cover at sites of conservation importance across Africa.

There is an emerging consensus that protected areas are key in reducing adverse land-cover change, but their efficacy remains difficult to quantify. Many previous assessments of protected area effectiveness have compared changes between sets of protected and unprotected sites that differ systematica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alison E Beresford, George W Eshiamwata, Paul F Donald, Andrew Balmford, Bastian Bertzky, Andreas B Brink, Lincoln D C Fishpool, Philippe Mayaux, Ben Phalan, Dario Simonetti, Graeme M Buchanan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3667134?pdf=render
_version_ 1811200248035409920
author Alison E Beresford
George W Eshiamwata
Paul F Donald
Andrew Balmford
Bastian Bertzky
Andreas B Brink
Lincoln D C Fishpool
Philippe Mayaux
Ben Phalan
Dario Simonetti
Graeme M Buchanan
author_facet Alison E Beresford
George W Eshiamwata
Paul F Donald
Andrew Balmford
Bastian Bertzky
Andreas B Brink
Lincoln D C Fishpool
Philippe Mayaux
Ben Phalan
Dario Simonetti
Graeme M Buchanan
author_sort Alison E Beresford
collection DOAJ
description There is an emerging consensus that protected areas are key in reducing adverse land-cover change, but their efficacy remains difficult to quantify. Many previous assessments of protected area effectiveness have compared changes between sets of protected and unprotected sites that differ systematically in other potentially confounding respects (e.g. altitude, accessibility), have considered only forest loss or changes at single sites, or have analysed changes derived from land-cover data of low spatial resolution. We assessed the effectiveness of protection in reducing land-cover change in Important Bird Areas (IBAs) across Africa using a dedicated visual interpretation of higher resolution satellite imagery. We compared rates of change in natural land-cover over a c. 20-year period from around 1990 at a large number of points across 45 protected IBAs to those from 48 unprotected IBAs. A matching algorithm was used to select sample points to control for potentially confounding differences between protected and unprotected IBAs. The rate of loss of natural land-cover at sample points within protected IBAs was just 42% of that at matched points in unprotected IBAs. Conversion was especially marked in forests, but protection reduced rates of forest loss by a similar relative amount. Rates of conversion increased from the centre to the edges of both protected and unprotected IBAs, but rates of loss in 20-km buffer zones surrounding protected IBAs and unprotected IBAs were similar, with no evidence of displacement of conversion from within protected areas to their immediate surrounds (leakage).
first_indexed 2024-04-12T02:01:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d8ac37fb0f74856a01ef34702e5be0f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T02:01:27Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-8d8ac37fb0f74856a01ef34702e5be0f2022-12-22T03:52:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0185e6537010.1371/journal.pone.0065370Protection reduces loss of natural land-cover at sites of conservation importance across Africa.Alison E BeresfordGeorge W EshiamwataPaul F DonaldAndrew BalmfordBastian BertzkyAndreas B BrinkLincoln D C FishpoolPhilippe MayauxBen PhalanDario SimonettiGraeme M BuchananThere is an emerging consensus that protected areas are key in reducing adverse land-cover change, but their efficacy remains difficult to quantify. Many previous assessments of protected area effectiveness have compared changes between sets of protected and unprotected sites that differ systematically in other potentially confounding respects (e.g. altitude, accessibility), have considered only forest loss or changes at single sites, or have analysed changes derived from land-cover data of low spatial resolution. We assessed the effectiveness of protection in reducing land-cover change in Important Bird Areas (IBAs) across Africa using a dedicated visual interpretation of higher resolution satellite imagery. We compared rates of change in natural land-cover over a c. 20-year period from around 1990 at a large number of points across 45 protected IBAs to those from 48 unprotected IBAs. A matching algorithm was used to select sample points to control for potentially confounding differences between protected and unprotected IBAs. The rate of loss of natural land-cover at sample points within protected IBAs was just 42% of that at matched points in unprotected IBAs. Conversion was especially marked in forests, but protection reduced rates of forest loss by a similar relative amount. Rates of conversion increased from the centre to the edges of both protected and unprotected IBAs, but rates of loss in 20-km buffer zones surrounding protected IBAs and unprotected IBAs were similar, with no evidence of displacement of conversion from within protected areas to their immediate surrounds (leakage).http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3667134?pdf=render
spellingShingle Alison E Beresford
George W Eshiamwata
Paul F Donald
Andrew Balmford
Bastian Bertzky
Andreas B Brink
Lincoln D C Fishpool
Philippe Mayaux
Ben Phalan
Dario Simonetti
Graeme M Buchanan
Protection reduces loss of natural land-cover at sites of conservation importance across Africa.
PLoS ONE
title Protection reduces loss of natural land-cover at sites of conservation importance across Africa.
title_full Protection reduces loss of natural land-cover at sites of conservation importance across Africa.
title_fullStr Protection reduces loss of natural land-cover at sites of conservation importance across Africa.
title_full_unstemmed Protection reduces loss of natural land-cover at sites of conservation importance across Africa.
title_short Protection reduces loss of natural land-cover at sites of conservation importance across Africa.
title_sort protection reduces loss of natural land cover at sites of conservation importance across africa
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3667134?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT alisoneberesford protectionreduceslossofnaturallandcoveratsitesofconservationimportanceacrossafrica
AT georgeweshiamwata protectionreduceslossofnaturallandcoveratsitesofconservationimportanceacrossafrica
AT paulfdonald protectionreduceslossofnaturallandcoveratsitesofconservationimportanceacrossafrica
AT andrewbalmford protectionreduceslossofnaturallandcoveratsitesofconservationimportanceacrossafrica
AT bastianbertzky protectionreduceslossofnaturallandcoveratsitesofconservationimportanceacrossafrica
AT andreasbbrink protectionreduceslossofnaturallandcoveratsitesofconservationimportanceacrossafrica
AT lincolndcfishpool protectionreduceslossofnaturallandcoveratsitesofconservationimportanceacrossafrica
AT philippemayaux protectionreduceslossofnaturallandcoveratsitesofconservationimportanceacrossafrica
AT benphalan protectionreduceslossofnaturallandcoveratsitesofconservationimportanceacrossafrica
AT dariosimonetti protectionreduceslossofnaturallandcoveratsitesofconservationimportanceacrossafrica
AT graemembuchanan protectionreduceslossofnaturallandcoveratsitesofconservationimportanceacrossafrica