Differences in sperm ultrastructure between Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae): could be used as a taxonomic trait?

The sperm ultrastructure has been used to solve several systematic and phylogenetic problems in marine invertebrates. The sperm ultrastructure of the Chilean mussel Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis corresponds to the ect-aquasperm type. Sperm from both taxa measured 55-60 μm between h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pablo A Oyarzún, Jorge E Toro, Orlando Garrido, Carolina Briones, Ricardo Guiñez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso 2014-03-01
Series:Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-560X2014000100014&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1819299401099640832
author Pablo A Oyarzún
Jorge E Toro
Orlando Garrido
Carolina Briones
Ricardo Guiñez
author_facet Pablo A Oyarzún
Jorge E Toro
Orlando Garrido
Carolina Briones
Ricardo Guiñez
author_sort Pablo A Oyarzún
collection DOAJ
description The sperm ultrastructure has been used to solve several systematic and phylogenetic problems in marine invertebrates. The sperm ultrastructure of the Chilean mussel Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis corresponds to the ect-aquasperm type. Sperm from both taxa measured 55-60 μm between head (acrosome + nucleus), midpiece (only 5 mitochondria) and the flagellum which in its end piece has a smaller diameter tail. The differences between both taxa are clearly shown, in the structure of the acrosome and nucleus. Therefore, according to our results and those reported in the literature, we indicate that Chilean native mussel sperm is different from other species of the Mytilus complex (M. trossulus, M. galloprovincialis and M. edulis). These differences in sperm ultrastructure found in M. chilensis, are another trait that can be used to validate the taxonomic status of the species. Differences in sperm morphology are related with reproductive isolation, and probably will be useful to understand future data on speciation. Finally, we discussed the finding that Mytilus galloprovincialis sperm from Chile have an acrosome notoriously smaller than those reported for specimens from Europe and Africa, though they have a great similarity with specimens from Japan, as reported in the literature.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T05:45:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8d92639dabc1452c98428cfbb76f8fed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0718-560X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T05:45:12Z
publishDate 2014-03-01
publisher Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
record_format Article
series Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research
spelling doaj.art-8d92639dabc1452c98428cfbb76f8fed2022-12-21T17:12:37ZengEscuela de Ciencias del Mar, Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Pontificia Universidad Católica de ValparaísoLatin American Journal of Aquatic Research0718-560X2014-03-01421172179S0718-560X2014000100014Differences in sperm ultrastructure between Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae): could be used as a taxonomic trait?Pablo A Oyarzún0Jorge E Toro1Orlando Garrido2Carolina Briones3Ricardo Guiñez4Universidad Austral de ChileUniversidad Austral de ChileUniversidad Austral de ChileUniversidad de AntofagastaUniversidad de AntofagastaThe sperm ultrastructure has been used to solve several systematic and phylogenetic problems in marine invertebrates. The sperm ultrastructure of the Chilean mussel Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis corresponds to the ect-aquasperm type. Sperm from both taxa measured 55-60 μm between head (acrosome + nucleus), midpiece (only 5 mitochondria) and the flagellum which in its end piece has a smaller diameter tail. The differences between both taxa are clearly shown, in the structure of the acrosome and nucleus. Therefore, according to our results and those reported in the literature, we indicate that Chilean native mussel sperm is different from other species of the Mytilus complex (M. trossulus, M. galloprovincialis and M. edulis). These differences in sperm ultrastructure found in M. chilensis, are another trait that can be used to validate the taxonomic status of the species. Differences in sperm morphology are related with reproductive isolation, and probably will be useful to understand future data on speciation. Finally, we discussed the finding that Mytilus galloprovincialis sperm from Chile have an acrosome notoriously smaller than those reported for specimens from Europe and Africa, though they have a great similarity with specimens from Japan, as reported in the literature.http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-560X2014000100014&lng=en&tlng=enmejillonesMytilus chilensisMytilus galloprovincialisespermatozoidesacuespermataxonomía
spellingShingle Pablo A Oyarzún
Jorge E Toro
Orlando Garrido
Carolina Briones
Ricardo Guiñez
Differences in sperm ultrastructure between Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae): could be used as a taxonomic trait?
Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research
mejillones
Mytilus chilensis
Mytilus galloprovincialis
espermatozoides
acuesperma
taxonomía
title Differences in sperm ultrastructure between Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae): could be used as a taxonomic trait?
title_full Differences in sperm ultrastructure between Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae): could be used as a taxonomic trait?
title_fullStr Differences in sperm ultrastructure between Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae): could be used as a taxonomic trait?
title_full_unstemmed Differences in sperm ultrastructure between Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae): could be used as a taxonomic trait?
title_short Differences in sperm ultrastructure between Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae): could be used as a taxonomic trait?
title_sort differences in sperm ultrastructure between mytilus chilensis and mytilus galloprovincialis bivalvia mytilidae could be used as a taxonomic trait
topic mejillones
Mytilus chilensis
Mytilus galloprovincialis
espermatozoides
acuesperma
taxonomía
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-560X2014000100014&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT pabloaoyarzun differencesinspermultrastructurebetweenmytiluschilensisandmytilusgalloprovincialisbivalviamytilidaecouldbeusedasataxonomictrait
AT jorgeetoro differencesinspermultrastructurebetweenmytiluschilensisandmytilusgalloprovincialisbivalviamytilidaecouldbeusedasataxonomictrait
AT orlandogarrido differencesinspermultrastructurebetweenmytiluschilensisandmytilusgalloprovincialisbivalviamytilidaecouldbeusedasataxonomictrait
AT carolinabriones differencesinspermultrastructurebetweenmytiluschilensisandmytilusgalloprovincialisbivalviamytilidaecouldbeusedasataxonomictrait
AT ricardoguinez differencesinspermultrastructurebetweenmytiluschilensisandmytilusgalloprovincialisbivalviamytilidaecouldbeusedasataxonomictrait