Law and Violence in the Colombian Post-Conflict: State-Making in the Wake of the Peace Agreement

Colombia’s 2016 Peace Agreement with the FARC guerrilla extends beyond the end of the war and those measures for the disarmament, demobilization and reincorporation of former guerrillas. A large portion of the agreement is dedicated to the extension of the presence of the Colombian State into those...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julieta Lemaitre, Esteban Restrepo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de los Andes 2019-01-01
Series:Revista de Estudios Sociales
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/res67.2019.01
_version_ 1811325911941775360
author Julieta Lemaitre
Esteban Restrepo
author_facet Julieta Lemaitre
Esteban Restrepo
author_sort Julieta Lemaitre
collection DOAJ
description Colombia’s 2016 Peace Agreement with the FARC guerrilla extends beyond the end of the war and those measures for the disarmament, demobilization and reincorporation of former guerrillas. A large portion of the agreement is dedicated to the extension of the presence of the Colombian State into those areas of the country formerly under FARC control. The premise behind this extension, shared by Colombian elites as much as former guerrilla leaders, is that if the State remains absent then the areas will be occupied by criminal organizations interested in controlling the FARC cocaine trade, and, more generally, that the vast and sparsely populated territories will further descend into barbarism. This premise resonates with a long arc of persistent aspiration for a national identity that is shaped by the opposition between civilization and barbarism. Especially since the transformations effected by Colombia’s 1991 Constitution, the extension of civilization has been increasingly identified with the expansion of the rule of law and, therefore, with law’s mythical powers to order society and control barbarism. Under this premise, violence is equated to lawlessness and the remedy for violence assimilated to the expansion of the Estado social de derecho, the state form that embodies the rule of law in the Colombian Constitution. The foundational narrative of civilization versus barbarism, reflected by the hopes placed on the rule of law and the recipes for State-building by the 2016 Peace Agreement, continues to obscure the continuities between law and violence, and particularly the fact that the execution of legal institutions in formerly “lawless” territories maintains the violence of the moment of the adoption of legality. Both theoretical and empirical explorations of the present process of expansion of the Colombian State require critical examination of the hopes vested on law. A critical examination of this sort needs to engage with the continuities between law and violence explored in contemporary political philosophy and developed by Jean and John Comaroff’s ethnography. The productivity of this approach is highlighted by the essays in this dossier, which share the impulse to interrupt the foundational narrative of civilization and barbarism that remains in the institutions of Colombias’s present post-conflict endeavor.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T14:40:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8da57777d27a49e88f4ed8b9d3858d78
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0123-885X
1900-5180
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T14:40:45Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Universidad de los Andes
record_format Article
series Revista de Estudios Sociales
spelling doaj.art-8da57777d27a49e88f4ed8b9d3858d782022-12-22T02:42:54ZengUniversidad de los AndesRevista de Estudios Sociales0123-885X1900-51802019-01-016721610.7440/res67.2019.01Law and Violence in the Colombian Post-Conflict: State-Making in the Wake of the Peace AgreementJulieta Lemaitre0Esteban Restrepo1Universidad de los Andes, Colombia Universidad de los Andes, Colombia Colombia’s 2016 Peace Agreement with the FARC guerrilla extends beyond the end of the war and those measures for the disarmament, demobilization and reincorporation of former guerrillas. A large portion of the agreement is dedicated to the extension of the presence of the Colombian State into those areas of the country formerly under FARC control. The premise behind this extension, shared by Colombian elites as much as former guerrilla leaders, is that if the State remains absent then the areas will be occupied by criminal organizations interested in controlling the FARC cocaine trade, and, more generally, that the vast and sparsely populated territories will further descend into barbarism. This premise resonates with a long arc of persistent aspiration for a national identity that is shaped by the opposition between civilization and barbarism. Especially since the transformations effected by Colombia’s 1991 Constitution, the extension of civilization has been increasingly identified with the expansion of the rule of law and, therefore, with law’s mythical powers to order society and control barbarism. Under this premise, violence is equated to lawlessness and the remedy for violence assimilated to the expansion of the Estado social de derecho, the state form that embodies the rule of law in the Colombian Constitution. The foundational narrative of civilization versus barbarism, reflected by the hopes placed on the rule of law and the recipes for State-building by the 2016 Peace Agreement, continues to obscure the continuities between law and violence, and particularly the fact that the execution of legal institutions in formerly “lawless” territories maintains the violence of the moment of the adoption of legality. Both theoretical and empirical explorations of the present process of expansion of the Colombian State require critical examination of the hopes vested on law. A critical examination of this sort needs to engage with the continuities between law and violence explored in contemporary political philosophy and developed by Jean and John Comaroff’s ethnography. The productivity of this approach is highlighted by the essays in this dossier, which share the impulse to interrupt the foundational narrative of civilization and barbarism that remains in the institutions of Colombias’s present post-conflict endeavor.https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/res67.2019.01Thesaurus: civilizationpeaceAuthor: barbarismJean and John Comarofflaw and violencepost-conflictstate-makingterritorial peace
spellingShingle Julieta Lemaitre
Esteban Restrepo
Law and Violence in the Colombian Post-Conflict: State-Making in the Wake of the Peace Agreement
Revista de Estudios Sociales
Thesaurus: civilization
peace
Author: barbarism
Jean and John Comaroff
law and violence
post-conflict
state-making
territorial peace
title Law and Violence in the Colombian Post-Conflict: State-Making in the Wake of the Peace Agreement
title_full Law and Violence in the Colombian Post-Conflict: State-Making in the Wake of the Peace Agreement
title_fullStr Law and Violence in the Colombian Post-Conflict: State-Making in the Wake of the Peace Agreement
title_full_unstemmed Law and Violence in the Colombian Post-Conflict: State-Making in the Wake of the Peace Agreement
title_short Law and Violence in the Colombian Post-Conflict: State-Making in the Wake of the Peace Agreement
title_sort law and violence in the colombian post conflict state making in the wake of the peace agreement
topic Thesaurus: civilization
peace
Author: barbarism
Jean and John Comaroff
law and violence
post-conflict
state-making
territorial peace
url https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/res67.2019.01
work_keys_str_mv AT julietalemaitre lawandviolenceinthecolombianpostconflictstatemakinginthewakeofthepeaceagreement
AT estebanrestrepo lawandviolenceinthecolombianpostconflictstatemakinginthewakeofthepeaceagreement