Evaluate Risk Analysis of Measurement Uncertainty (MU) of Different Methods Applied for Veterinary Vaccines Evaluation

Veterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute (VSVRI ) objected to producing highly efficient vaccines from reference or local isolates according to the international specifications for protecting animals and poultry against different diseases and preparing combined vaccines to save effort, time a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hala Elsawy, Amany El Zieny, H. M. El Naggar, Doaa Rady, Eman Zaki, Fouad El tahaan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Egyptian Society for Animal Management 2022-10-01
Series:Journal of Applied Veterinary Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://javs.journals.ekb.eg/article_257155_da1a985a7a398ccd29f308579d19421d.pdf
_version_ 1811258184450441216
author Hala Elsawy
Amany El Zieny
H. M. El Naggar
Doaa Rady
Eman Zaki
Fouad El tahaan
author_facet Hala Elsawy
Amany El Zieny
H. M. El Naggar
Doaa Rady
Eman Zaki
Fouad El tahaan
author_sort Hala Elsawy
collection DOAJ
description Veterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute (VSVRI ) objected to producing highly efficient vaccines from reference or local isolates according to the international specifications for protecting animals and poultry against different diseases and preparing combined vaccines to save effort, time and money. VSVRI produces various types of vaccines such as live attenuated viral poultry, live attenuated viral animal vaccines, live attenuated Bacterial animal vaccines and Inactivated viral animal vaccines. These vaccines are subjected to quality assurance through seven methods with different techniques. Validity and measurement uncertainty for results were applied in the evaluation of results of the following: Titration of virus content using egg inoculation through Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM), Intra-allantoic (IA) and Tissue Culture (TC). Determination of antibody titer using ELISA, HI   and VNT techniques. Finally, enumeration of aerobic bacterial count for living attenuated Bacterial vaccine by culture technique. Homogeneity and stability results for all vaccines were accepted criteria according to TS/ ISO 22117. The reproducibility component of the TC technique was higher while the Bias was lower than other different routes of egg inoculation. In conclusion, the accuracy of TC technique is better than the egg inoculation technique which will reflect on the measurement of uncertainty. There is no significant change in the final measurement uncertainty of different routes of egg inoculation. In comparison, there is a variance between bias accuracy and reproducibility precision due to the equation of measurement of uncertainty depending on all processes performed in test accuracy and precession.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T18:09:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8da6b6646aa241e28d1693d522fc0bf8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1687-4072
2090-3308
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T18:09:17Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Egyptian Society for Animal Management
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Veterinary Sciences
spelling doaj.art-8da6b6646aa241e28d1693d522fc0bf82022-12-22T03:21:53ZengEgyptian Society for Animal ManagementJournal of Applied Veterinary Sciences1687-40722090-33082022-10-0174445410.21608/javs.2022.150328.1163257155Evaluate Risk Analysis of Measurement Uncertainty (MU) of Different Methods Applied for Veterinary Vaccines EvaluationHala Elsawy0Amany El Zieny1H. M. El Naggar2Doaa Rady3Eman Zaki4Fouad El tahaan5Department of Quality Control Lab (QCL) Veterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute (VSVRI), Abbasia, Cairo, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), EgyptDepartment of Quality Control Lab (QCL) Veterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute (VSVRI), Abbasia, Cairo, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), EgyptDepartment of Quality Control Lab (QCL) Veterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute (VSVRI), Abbasia, Cairo, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), EgyptDepartment of Quality Control Lab (QCL) Veterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute (VSVRI), Abbasia, Cairo, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), EgyptDepartment of Quality Control Lab (QCL) Veterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute (VSVRI), Abbasia, Cairo, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), EgyptCentral Laboratory for Evaluation of Veterinary Biologics (CLEVB), Abbasia, Cairo, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), EgyptVeterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute (VSVRI ) objected to producing highly efficient vaccines from reference or local isolates according to the international specifications for protecting animals and poultry against different diseases and preparing combined vaccines to save effort, time and money. VSVRI produces various types of vaccines such as live attenuated viral poultry, live attenuated viral animal vaccines, live attenuated Bacterial animal vaccines and Inactivated viral animal vaccines. These vaccines are subjected to quality assurance through seven methods with different techniques. Validity and measurement uncertainty for results were applied in the evaluation of results of the following: Titration of virus content using egg inoculation through Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM), Intra-allantoic (IA) and Tissue Culture (TC). Determination of antibody titer using ELISA, HI   and VNT techniques. Finally, enumeration of aerobic bacterial count for living attenuated Bacterial vaccine by culture technique. Homogeneity and stability results for all vaccines were accepted criteria according to TS/ ISO 22117. The reproducibility component of the TC technique was higher while the Bias was lower than other different routes of egg inoculation. In conclusion, the accuracy of TC technique is better than the egg inoculation technique which will reflect on the measurement of uncertainty. There is no significant change in the final measurement uncertainty of different routes of egg inoculation. In comparison, there is a variance between bias accuracy and reproducibility precision due to the equation of measurement of uncertainty depending on all processes performed in test accuracy and precession.https://javs.journals.ekb.eg/article_257155_da1a985a7a398ccd29f308579d19421d.pdfbias accuracy and reproducibility precisionmeasurement uncertaintyvaccine
spellingShingle Hala Elsawy
Amany El Zieny
H. M. El Naggar
Doaa Rady
Eman Zaki
Fouad El tahaan
Evaluate Risk Analysis of Measurement Uncertainty (MU) of Different Methods Applied for Veterinary Vaccines Evaluation
Journal of Applied Veterinary Sciences
bias accuracy and reproducibility precision
measurement uncertainty
vaccine
title Evaluate Risk Analysis of Measurement Uncertainty (MU) of Different Methods Applied for Veterinary Vaccines Evaluation
title_full Evaluate Risk Analysis of Measurement Uncertainty (MU) of Different Methods Applied for Veterinary Vaccines Evaluation
title_fullStr Evaluate Risk Analysis of Measurement Uncertainty (MU) of Different Methods Applied for Veterinary Vaccines Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluate Risk Analysis of Measurement Uncertainty (MU) of Different Methods Applied for Veterinary Vaccines Evaluation
title_short Evaluate Risk Analysis of Measurement Uncertainty (MU) of Different Methods Applied for Veterinary Vaccines Evaluation
title_sort evaluate risk analysis of measurement uncertainty mu of different methods applied for veterinary vaccines evaluation
topic bias accuracy and reproducibility precision
measurement uncertainty
vaccine
url https://javs.journals.ekb.eg/article_257155_da1a985a7a398ccd29f308579d19421d.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT halaelsawy evaluateriskanalysisofmeasurementuncertaintymuofdifferentmethodsappliedforveterinaryvaccinesevaluation
AT amanyelzieny evaluateriskanalysisofmeasurementuncertaintymuofdifferentmethodsappliedforveterinaryvaccinesevaluation
AT hmelnaggar evaluateriskanalysisofmeasurementuncertaintymuofdifferentmethodsappliedforveterinaryvaccinesevaluation
AT doaarady evaluateriskanalysisofmeasurementuncertaintymuofdifferentmethodsappliedforveterinaryvaccinesevaluation
AT emanzaki evaluateriskanalysisofmeasurementuncertaintymuofdifferentmethodsappliedforveterinaryvaccinesevaluation
AT fouadeltahaan evaluateriskanalysisofmeasurementuncertaintymuofdifferentmethodsappliedforveterinaryvaccinesevaluation