Sequential regression and simulation: a method for estimating causal effects from heterogeneous clinical trials without a common control group

Abstract Background The advent of clinical trial data sharing platforms has created opportunities for making new discoveries and answering important questions using already collected data. However, existing methods for meta-analyzing these data require the presence of shared control groups across st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vivek A. Rudrapatna, Vignesh G. Ravindranath, Douglas V. Arneson, Arman Mosenia, Atul J. Butte, Shan Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-10-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02020-5
_version_ 1827710344353546240
author Vivek A. Rudrapatna
Vignesh G. Ravindranath
Douglas V. Arneson
Arman Mosenia
Atul J. Butte
Shan Wang
author_facet Vivek A. Rudrapatna
Vignesh G. Ravindranath
Douglas V. Arneson
Arman Mosenia
Atul J. Butte
Shan Wang
author_sort Vivek A. Rudrapatna
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The advent of clinical trial data sharing platforms has created opportunities for making new discoveries and answering important questions using already collected data. However, existing methods for meta-analyzing these data require the presence of shared control groups across studies, significantly limiting the number of questions that can be confidently addressed. We sought to develop a method for meta-analyzing potentially heterogeneous clinical trials even in the absence of a common control group. Methods This work was conducted within the context of a broader effort to study comparative efficacy in Crohn’s disease. Following a search of clnicaltrials.gov we obtained access to the individual participant data from nine trials of FDA-approved treatments in Crohn’s Disease (N = 3392). We developed a method involving sequences of regression and simulation to separately model the placebo- and drug-attributable effects, and to simulate head-to-head trials against an appropriately normalized background. We validated this method by comparing the outcome of a simulated trial comparing the efficacies of adalimumab and ustekinumab against the recently published results of SEAVUE, an actual head-to-head trial of these drugs. This study was pre-registered on PROSPERO (#157,827) prior to the completion of SEAVUE. Results Using our method of sequential regression and simulation, we compared the week eight outcomes of two virtual cohorts subject to the same patient selection criteria as SEAVUE and treated with adalimumab or ustekinumab. Our primary analysis replicated the corresponding published results from SEAVUE (p = 0.9). This finding proved stable under multiple sensitivity analyses. Conclusions This new method may help reduce the bias of individual participant data meta-analyses, expand the scope of what can be learned from these already-collected data, and reduce the costs of obtaining high-quality evidence to guide patient care.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T17:36:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8da8d83d495e41b6a439f4f4fd481d54
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2288
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T17:36:39Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj.art-8da8d83d495e41b6a439f4f4fd481d542023-11-20T09:49:32ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882023-10-0123111210.1186/s12874-023-02020-5Sequential regression and simulation: a method for estimating causal effects from heterogeneous clinical trials without a common control groupVivek A. Rudrapatna0Vignesh G. Ravindranath1Douglas V. Arneson2Arman Mosenia3Atul J. Butte4Shan Wang5Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of CaliforniaBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of CaliforniaBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of CaliforniaSchool of Medicine, University of CaliforniaBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of San FranciscoAbstract Background The advent of clinical trial data sharing platforms has created opportunities for making new discoveries and answering important questions using already collected data. However, existing methods for meta-analyzing these data require the presence of shared control groups across studies, significantly limiting the number of questions that can be confidently addressed. We sought to develop a method for meta-analyzing potentially heterogeneous clinical trials even in the absence of a common control group. Methods This work was conducted within the context of a broader effort to study comparative efficacy in Crohn’s disease. Following a search of clnicaltrials.gov we obtained access to the individual participant data from nine trials of FDA-approved treatments in Crohn’s Disease (N = 3392). We developed a method involving sequences of regression and simulation to separately model the placebo- and drug-attributable effects, and to simulate head-to-head trials against an appropriately normalized background. We validated this method by comparing the outcome of a simulated trial comparing the efficacies of adalimumab and ustekinumab against the recently published results of SEAVUE, an actual head-to-head trial of these drugs. This study was pre-registered on PROSPERO (#157,827) prior to the completion of SEAVUE. Results Using our method of sequential regression and simulation, we compared the week eight outcomes of two virtual cohorts subject to the same patient selection criteria as SEAVUE and treated with adalimumab or ustekinumab. Our primary analysis replicated the corresponding published results from SEAVUE (p = 0.9). This finding proved stable under multiple sensitivity analyses. Conclusions This new method may help reduce the bias of individual participant data meta-analyses, expand the scope of what can be learned from these already-collected data, and reduce the costs of obtaining high-quality evidence to guide patient care.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02020-5Individual participant data meta-analysisRandomized clinical trialsCrohn’s diseaseComparative effectivenessComparative efficacyEvidence synthesis
spellingShingle Vivek A. Rudrapatna
Vignesh G. Ravindranath
Douglas V. Arneson
Arman Mosenia
Atul J. Butte
Shan Wang
Sequential regression and simulation: a method for estimating causal effects from heterogeneous clinical trials without a common control group
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Individual participant data meta-analysis
Randomized clinical trials
Crohn’s disease
Comparative effectiveness
Comparative efficacy
Evidence synthesis
title Sequential regression and simulation: a method for estimating causal effects from heterogeneous clinical trials without a common control group
title_full Sequential regression and simulation: a method for estimating causal effects from heterogeneous clinical trials without a common control group
title_fullStr Sequential regression and simulation: a method for estimating causal effects from heterogeneous clinical trials without a common control group
title_full_unstemmed Sequential regression and simulation: a method for estimating causal effects from heterogeneous clinical trials without a common control group
title_short Sequential regression and simulation: a method for estimating causal effects from heterogeneous clinical trials without a common control group
title_sort sequential regression and simulation a method for estimating causal effects from heterogeneous clinical trials without a common control group
topic Individual participant data meta-analysis
Randomized clinical trials
Crohn’s disease
Comparative effectiveness
Comparative efficacy
Evidence synthesis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02020-5
work_keys_str_mv AT vivekarudrapatna sequentialregressionandsimulationamethodforestimatingcausaleffectsfromheterogeneousclinicaltrialswithoutacommoncontrolgroup
AT vigneshgravindranath sequentialregressionandsimulationamethodforestimatingcausaleffectsfromheterogeneousclinicaltrialswithoutacommoncontrolgroup
AT douglasvarneson sequentialregressionandsimulationamethodforestimatingcausaleffectsfromheterogeneousclinicaltrialswithoutacommoncontrolgroup
AT armanmosenia sequentialregressionandsimulationamethodforestimatingcausaleffectsfromheterogeneousclinicaltrialswithoutacommoncontrolgroup
AT atuljbutte sequentialregressionandsimulationamethodforestimatingcausaleffectsfromheterogeneousclinicaltrialswithoutacommoncontrolgroup
AT shanwang sequentialregressionandsimulationamethodforestimatingcausaleffectsfromheterogeneousclinicaltrialswithoutacommoncontrolgroup