Evidence of co-exposure with Brucella spp, Coxiella burnetii, and Rift Valley fever virus among various species of wildlife in Kenya.
<h4>Background</h4>Co-infection, especially with pathogens of dissimilar genetic makeup, may result in a more devastating impact on the host. Investigations on co-infection with neglected zoonotic pathogens in wildlife are necessary to inform appropriate prevention and control strategies...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-08-01
|
| Series: | PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010596 |
| _version_ | 1817998190902771712 |
|---|---|
| author | Francis Gakuya James Akoko Lillian Wambua Richard Nyamota Bernard Ronoh Isaac Lekolool Athman Mwatondo Mathew Muturi Collins Ouma Daniel Nthiwa Earl Middlebrook Jeanne Fair John Gachohi Kariuki Njenga Bernard Bett |
| author_facet | Francis Gakuya James Akoko Lillian Wambua Richard Nyamota Bernard Ronoh Isaac Lekolool Athman Mwatondo Mathew Muturi Collins Ouma Daniel Nthiwa Earl Middlebrook Jeanne Fair John Gachohi Kariuki Njenga Bernard Bett |
| author_sort | Francis Gakuya |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>Co-infection, especially with pathogens of dissimilar genetic makeup, may result in a more devastating impact on the host. Investigations on co-infection with neglected zoonotic pathogens in wildlife are necessary to inform appropriate prevention and control strategies to reduce disease burden in wildlife and the potential transmission of these pathogens between wildlife, livestock and humans. This study assessed co-exposure of various Kenyan wildflife species with Brucella spp, Coxiella burnetii and Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV).<h4>Methodology</h4>A total of 363 sera from 16 different wildlife species, most of them (92.6%) herbivores, were analysed by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IgG antibodies against Brucella spp, C. burnetii and RVFV. Further, 280 of these were tested by PCR to identify Brucella species.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 16 wildlife species tested, 15 (93.8%) were seropositive for at least one of the pathogens. Mean seropositivities were 18.9% (95% CI: 15.0-23.3) for RVFV, 13.7% (95% CI: 10.3-17.7) for Brucella spp and 9.1% (95% CI: 6.3-12.5) for C. burnetii. Buffaloes (n = 269) had higher seropositivity for Brucella spp. (17.1%, 95% CI: 13.0-21.7%) and RVFV (23.4%, 95% CI: 18.6-28.6%), while giraffes (n = 36) had the highest seropositivity for C. burnetii (44.4%, 95% CI: 27.9-61.9%). Importantly, 23 of the 93 (24.7%) animals positive for at least one pathogen were co-exposed, with 25.4% (18/71) of the positive buffaloes positive for brucellosis and RVFV. On molecular analysis, Brucella DNA was detected in 46 (19.5%, CI: 14.9-24.7) samples, with 4 (8.6%, 95% CI: 2.2-15.8) being identified as B. melitensis. The Fisher's Exact test indicated that seropositivity varied significantly within the different animal families, with Brucella (p = 0.013), C. burnetii (p = <0.001) and RVFV (p = 0.007). Location was also significantly associated (p = <0.001) with Brucella spp. and C. burnetii seropositivities.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Of ~20% of Kenyan wildlife that are seropositive for Brucella spp, C. burnetii and RVFV, almost 25% indicate co-infections with the three pathogens, particularly with Brucella spp and RVFV. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-14T02:50:21Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8db9a337f3fb4c65adc95f6ef750de0b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1935-2727 1935-2735 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-14T02:50:21Z |
| publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases |
| spelling | doaj.art-8db9a337f3fb4c65adc95f6ef750de0b2022-12-22T02:16:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases1935-27271935-27352022-08-01168e001059610.1371/journal.pntd.0010596Evidence of co-exposure with Brucella spp, Coxiella burnetii, and Rift Valley fever virus among various species of wildlife in Kenya.Francis GakuyaJames AkokoLillian WambuaRichard NyamotaBernard RonohIsaac LekoloolAthman MwatondoMathew MuturiCollins OumaDaniel NthiwaEarl MiddlebrookJeanne FairJohn GachohiKariuki NjengaBernard Bett<h4>Background</h4>Co-infection, especially with pathogens of dissimilar genetic makeup, may result in a more devastating impact on the host. Investigations on co-infection with neglected zoonotic pathogens in wildlife are necessary to inform appropriate prevention and control strategies to reduce disease burden in wildlife and the potential transmission of these pathogens between wildlife, livestock and humans. This study assessed co-exposure of various Kenyan wildflife species with Brucella spp, Coxiella burnetii and Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV).<h4>Methodology</h4>A total of 363 sera from 16 different wildlife species, most of them (92.6%) herbivores, were analysed by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IgG antibodies against Brucella spp, C. burnetii and RVFV. Further, 280 of these were tested by PCR to identify Brucella species.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 16 wildlife species tested, 15 (93.8%) were seropositive for at least one of the pathogens. Mean seropositivities were 18.9% (95% CI: 15.0-23.3) for RVFV, 13.7% (95% CI: 10.3-17.7) for Brucella spp and 9.1% (95% CI: 6.3-12.5) for C. burnetii. Buffaloes (n = 269) had higher seropositivity for Brucella spp. (17.1%, 95% CI: 13.0-21.7%) and RVFV (23.4%, 95% CI: 18.6-28.6%), while giraffes (n = 36) had the highest seropositivity for C. burnetii (44.4%, 95% CI: 27.9-61.9%). Importantly, 23 of the 93 (24.7%) animals positive for at least one pathogen were co-exposed, with 25.4% (18/71) of the positive buffaloes positive for brucellosis and RVFV. On molecular analysis, Brucella DNA was detected in 46 (19.5%, CI: 14.9-24.7) samples, with 4 (8.6%, 95% CI: 2.2-15.8) being identified as B. melitensis. The Fisher's Exact test indicated that seropositivity varied significantly within the different animal families, with Brucella (p = 0.013), C. burnetii (p = <0.001) and RVFV (p = 0.007). Location was also significantly associated (p = <0.001) with Brucella spp. and C. burnetii seropositivities.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Of ~20% of Kenyan wildlife that are seropositive for Brucella spp, C. burnetii and RVFV, almost 25% indicate co-infections with the three pathogens, particularly with Brucella spp and RVFV.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010596 |
| spellingShingle | Francis Gakuya James Akoko Lillian Wambua Richard Nyamota Bernard Ronoh Isaac Lekolool Athman Mwatondo Mathew Muturi Collins Ouma Daniel Nthiwa Earl Middlebrook Jeanne Fair John Gachohi Kariuki Njenga Bernard Bett Evidence of co-exposure with Brucella spp, Coxiella burnetii, and Rift Valley fever virus among various species of wildlife in Kenya. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases |
| title | Evidence of co-exposure with Brucella spp, Coxiella burnetii, and Rift Valley fever virus among various species of wildlife in Kenya. |
| title_full | Evidence of co-exposure with Brucella spp, Coxiella burnetii, and Rift Valley fever virus among various species of wildlife in Kenya. |
| title_fullStr | Evidence of co-exposure with Brucella spp, Coxiella burnetii, and Rift Valley fever virus among various species of wildlife in Kenya. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evidence of co-exposure with Brucella spp, Coxiella burnetii, and Rift Valley fever virus among various species of wildlife in Kenya. |
| title_short | Evidence of co-exposure with Brucella spp, Coxiella burnetii, and Rift Valley fever virus among various species of wildlife in Kenya. |
| title_sort | evidence of co exposure with brucella spp coxiella burnetii and rift valley fever virus among various species of wildlife in kenya |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010596 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT francisgakuya evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya AT jamesakoko evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya AT lillianwambua evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya AT richardnyamota evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya AT bernardronoh evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya AT isaaclekolool evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya AT athmanmwatondo evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya AT mathewmuturi evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya AT collinsouma evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya AT danielnthiwa evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya AT earlmiddlebrook evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya AT jeannefair evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya AT johngachohi evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya AT kariukinjenga evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya AT bernardbett evidenceofcoexposurewithbrucellasppcoxiellaburnetiiandriftvalleyfevervirusamongvariousspeciesofwildlifeinkenya |