Differences in Cognitive-Motor Interference in Older Adults While Walking and Performing a Visual-Verbal Stroop Task

Objectives: Studies using the dual-task (DT) paradigm to explain age-related performance decline due to cognitive-motor interference (CMI) which causes DT costs (DTCs) revealed contradictory results for performances under DT conditions. This cross-sectional study analyzed whether differences in demo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bettina Wollesen, Claudia Voelcker-Rehage
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00426/full
_version_ 1819152563537182720
author Bettina Wollesen
Claudia Voelcker-Rehage
author_facet Bettina Wollesen
Claudia Voelcker-Rehage
author_sort Bettina Wollesen
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: Studies using the dual-task (DT) paradigm to explain age-related performance decline due to cognitive-motor interference (CMI) which causes DT costs (DTCs) revealed contradictory results for performances under DT conditions. This cross-sectional study analyzed whether differences in demographics, physical functioning, concerns of falling (CoF), and other mental factors can explain positive and negative DTCs in older adults while walking in DT situations.Methodology: N = 222 participants (57–89 years) performed a single task (ST) and a DT walking condition (visual-verbal Stroop task) in randomized order on a treadmill. Gait parameters (step length, step width) were measured at a constant self-selected walking speed. Demographics [age, Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE)], physical functioning (hand grip strength), CoF [Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I)], and mental factors [Short Form-12 (SF-12)] were assessed. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to reveal subgroup differences. A four-step hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to identify which variables determine the DTC.Results: Three subgroups were identified: (1) participants (n = 53) with positive DTCs (improvements under DT conditions); (2) participants with negative DTCs (n = 60) in all gait parameters; and (3) participants (n = 109) who revealed non-uniform DTCs. Baseline characteristics between the subgroups showed differences in age (F(2,215) = 4.953; p = 0.008; η2 = 0.044). The regression analysis revealed that physical functioning was associated with positive DTC and CoF with negative DTC.Conclusion: The results confirmed a huge inter-individual variability in older adults. They lead us to suggest that factors causing performance differences in DTCs needs to be reassessed. Functional age seems to determine DTCs rather than calendric age. Psychological variables particularly seem to negatively influence DT performance.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T14:51:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8dc3a05d47b0439984e5819d2210fbb6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1663-4365
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T14:51:17Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-8dc3a05d47b0439984e5819d2210fbb62022-12-21T18:22:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience1663-43652019-01-011010.3389/fnagi.2018.00426425263Differences in Cognitive-Motor Interference in Older Adults While Walking and Performing a Visual-Verbal Stroop TaskBettina Wollesen0Claudia Voelcker-Rehage1Department of Human Science, Faculty of Psychology and Movement Science, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, GermanySports Psychology, Institute of Human Movement Science and Health, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, GermanyObjectives: Studies using the dual-task (DT) paradigm to explain age-related performance decline due to cognitive-motor interference (CMI) which causes DT costs (DTCs) revealed contradictory results for performances under DT conditions. This cross-sectional study analyzed whether differences in demographics, physical functioning, concerns of falling (CoF), and other mental factors can explain positive and negative DTCs in older adults while walking in DT situations.Methodology: N = 222 participants (57–89 years) performed a single task (ST) and a DT walking condition (visual-verbal Stroop task) in randomized order on a treadmill. Gait parameters (step length, step width) were measured at a constant self-selected walking speed. Demographics [age, Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE)], physical functioning (hand grip strength), CoF [Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I)], and mental factors [Short Form-12 (SF-12)] were assessed. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to reveal subgroup differences. A four-step hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to identify which variables determine the DTC.Results: Three subgroups were identified: (1) participants (n = 53) with positive DTCs (improvements under DT conditions); (2) participants with negative DTCs (n = 60) in all gait parameters; and (3) participants (n = 109) who revealed non-uniform DTCs. Baseline characteristics between the subgroups showed differences in age (F(2,215) = 4.953; p = 0.008; η2 = 0.044). The regression analysis revealed that physical functioning was associated with positive DTC and CoF with negative DTC.Conclusion: The results confirmed a huge inter-individual variability in older adults. They lead us to suggest that factors causing performance differences in DTCs needs to be reassessed. Functional age seems to determine DTCs rather than calendric age. Psychological variables particularly seem to negatively influence DT performance.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00426/fullagingdual task performancewalkingcognitionphysical functioningconcerns of falling
spellingShingle Bettina Wollesen
Claudia Voelcker-Rehage
Differences in Cognitive-Motor Interference in Older Adults While Walking and Performing a Visual-Verbal Stroop Task
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
aging
dual task performance
walking
cognition
physical functioning
concerns of falling
title Differences in Cognitive-Motor Interference in Older Adults While Walking and Performing a Visual-Verbal Stroop Task
title_full Differences in Cognitive-Motor Interference in Older Adults While Walking and Performing a Visual-Verbal Stroop Task
title_fullStr Differences in Cognitive-Motor Interference in Older Adults While Walking and Performing a Visual-Verbal Stroop Task
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Cognitive-Motor Interference in Older Adults While Walking and Performing a Visual-Verbal Stroop Task
title_short Differences in Cognitive-Motor Interference in Older Adults While Walking and Performing a Visual-Verbal Stroop Task
title_sort differences in cognitive motor interference in older adults while walking and performing a visual verbal stroop task
topic aging
dual task performance
walking
cognition
physical functioning
concerns of falling
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00426/full
work_keys_str_mv AT bettinawollesen differencesincognitivemotorinterferenceinolderadultswhilewalkingandperformingavisualverbalstrooptask
AT claudiavoelckerrehage differencesincognitivemotorinterferenceinolderadultswhilewalkingandperformingavisualverbalstrooptask