Primary Wound Closure Versus Delayed Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis in Tikrit Teaching Hospital

Background: Two methods are used routinely for wound management following an appendectomy: delayed primary closure, which involves packing an open wound for 4-5 days followed by wound closure, and primary closure, which means closing the wound at the time of surgery. Primary closure has the potenti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed S Khazaal, Mohammed M Habash, Hamid H Sarhan, Qusay S Rasheed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: College of medicine/ University of Diyala 2019-07-01
Series:Diyala Journal of Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://djm.uodiyala.edu.iq/index.php/djm/article/view/279
_version_ 1797454774830891008
author Ahmed S Khazaal
Mohammed M Habash
Hamid H Sarhan
Qusay S Rasheed
author_facet Ahmed S Khazaal
Mohammed M Habash
Hamid H Sarhan
Qusay S Rasheed
author_sort Ahmed S Khazaal
collection DOAJ
description Background: Two methods are used routinely for wound management following an appendectomy: delayed primary closure, which involves packing an open wound for 4-5 days followed by wound closure, and primary closure, which means closing the wound at the time of surgery. Primary closure has the potential benefit of rapid wound healing associated with the elimination of painful and time-consuming dressing, as well as a reduction in overall hospital costs.                                                                                                                                Objective: To compare the incidence of wound infection after primary wound closure and delayed primary closure in patients with complicated appendicitis. Patients and Methods: A total of 78 patients with complicated appendicitis (gangrenous, perforated, and abscess) admitted to surgical wards in Tikrit Teaching Hospital for a period of 12 months (January 2013 to January 2014). Males were 45 and females were 33, their ages ranged from 17-55 years were included in the study. The patients were adult males and non-pregnant adult females whom underwent appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.              Results: Age and gender were not significant factors affecting wound closure type (p=0.772 and p=0.942 respectively). The mean period of symptoms duration in patients with delayed primary closure was significantly (p=0.037) longer (5.9±3.11 days), than that with primary closure (2.81±2.07 days). Duration of surgery was significantly (p=0.021) longer (37.98±6.7 minutes) for delayed primary closure, than for primary closure (22.71±8.11 minutes). The mean duration of stay per hospital was significantly (p=0.030) shorter (6.84±1.71 days) for delayed primary closure than for primary closure (8.7±0.94 days).                                             Conclusion: A better overall results related to the strategy of delayed primary closure despite the relative longer time of surgery and greater efforts done by the surgeon. This will give benefits to both the patient and surgeon.                                                                                     
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:41:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8dca58fe59004a37ad6c9207c8923b6c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2219-9764
2617-8982
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:41:55Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher College of medicine/ University of Diyala
record_format Article
series Diyala Journal of Medicine
spelling doaj.art-8dca58fe59004a37ad6c9207c8923b6c2023-11-24T23:24:08ZengCollege of medicine/ University of DiyalaDiyala Journal of Medicine2219-97642617-89822019-07-0192Primary Wound Closure Versus Delayed Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis in Tikrit Teaching HospitalAhmed S KhazaalMohammed M HabashHamid H SarhanQusay S Rasheed Background: Two methods are used routinely for wound management following an appendectomy: delayed primary closure, which involves packing an open wound for 4-5 days followed by wound closure, and primary closure, which means closing the wound at the time of surgery. Primary closure has the potential benefit of rapid wound healing associated with the elimination of painful and time-consuming dressing, as well as a reduction in overall hospital costs.                                                                                                                                Objective: To compare the incidence of wound infection after primary wound closure and delayed primary closure in patients with complicated appendicitis. Patients and Methods: A total of 78 patients with complicated appendicitis (gangrenous, perforated, and abscess) admitted to surgical wards in Tikrit Teaching Hospital for a period of 12 months (January 2013 to January 2014). Males were 45 and females were 33, their ages ranged from 17-55 years were included in the study. The patients were adult males and non-pregnant adult females whom underwent appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.              Results: Age and gender were not significant factors affecting wound closure type (p=0.772 and p=0.942 respectively). The mean period of symptoms duration in patients with delayed primary closure was significantly (p=0.037) longer (5.9±3.11 days), than that with primary closure (2.81±2.07 days). Duration of surgery was significantly (p=0.021) longer (37.98±6.7 minutes) for delayed primary closure, than for primary closure (22.71±8.11 minutes). The mean duration of stay per hospital was significantly (p=0.030) shorter (6.84±1.71 days) for delayed primary closure than for primary closure (8.7±0.94 days).                                             Conclusion: A better overall results related to the strategy of delayed primary closure despite the relative longer time of surgery and greater efforts done by the surgeon. This will give benefits to both the patient and surgeon.                                                                                      http://djm.uodiyala.edu.iq/index.php/djm/article/view/279Appendicitis, primary closure, surgical site infection
spellingShingle Ahmed S Khazaal
Mohammed M Habash
Hamid H Sarhan
Qusay S Rasheed
Primary Wound Closure Versus Delayed Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis in Tikrit Teaching Hospital
Diyala Journal of Medicine
Appendicitis, primary closure, surgical site infection
title Primary Wound Closure Versus Delayed Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis in Tikrit Teaching Hospital
title_full Primary Wound Closure Versus Delayed Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis in Tikrit Teaching Hospital
title_fullStr Primary Wound Closure Versus Delayed Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis in Tikrit Teaching Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Primary Wound Closure Versus Delayed Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis in Tikrit Teaching Hospital
title_short Primary Wound Closure Versus Delayed Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis in Tikrit Teaching Hospital
title_sort primary wound closure versus delayed primary wound closure in complicated appendicitis in tikrit teaching hospital
topic Appendicitis, primary closure, surgical site infection
url http://djm.uodiyala.edu.iq/index.php/djm/article/view/279
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedskhazaal primarywoundclosureversusdelayedprimarywoundclosureincomplicatedappendicitisintikritteachinghospital
AT mohammedmhabash primarywoundclosureversusdelayedprimarywoundclosureincomplicatedappendicitisintikritteachinghospital
AT hamidhsarhan primarywoundclosureversusdelayedprimarywoundclosureincomplicatedappendicitisintikritteachinghospital
AT qusaysrasheed primarywoundclosureversusdelayedprimarywoundclosureincomplicatedappendicitisintikritteachinghospital