The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe

Forests in Europe are changing due to interactions between climate change, nitrogen (N) deposition and new forest management practices. The concurrent impact on the forest greenhouse gas (GHG) balance is at present difficult to predict due to a lack of knowledge on controlling factors of GHG fluxes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Gundersen, J. R. Christiansen, G. Alberti, N. Brüggemann, S. Castaldi, R. Gasche, B. Kitzler, L. Klemedtsson, R. Lobo-do-Vale, F. Moldan, T. Rütting, P. Schleppi, P. Weslien, S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2012-10-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:http://www.biogeosciences.net/9/3999/2012/bg-9-3999-2012.pdf
_version_ 1811274518045392896
author P. Gundersen
J. R. Christiansen
G. Alberti
N. Brüggemann
S. Castaldi
R. Gasche
B. Kitzler
L. Klemedtsson
R. Lobo-do-Vale
F. Moldan
T. Rütting
P. Schleppi
P. Weslien
S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern
author_facet P. Gundersen
J. R. Christiansen
G. Alberti
N. Brüggemann
S. Castaldi
R. Gasche
B. Kitzler
L. Klemedtsson
R. Lobo-do-Vale
F. Moldan
T. Rütting
P. Schleppi
P. Weslien
S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern
author_sort P. Gundersen
collection DOAJ
description Forests in Europe are changing due to interactions between climate change, nitrogen (N) deposition and new forest management practices. The concurrent impact on the forest greenhouse gas (GHG) balance is at present difficult to predict due to a lack of knowledge on controlling factors of GHG fluxes and response to changes in these factors. To improve the mechanistic understanding of the ongoing changes, we studied the response of soil–atmosphere exchange of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) at twelve experimental or natural gradient forest sites, representing anticipated future forest change. The experimental manipulations, one or more per site, included N addition (4 sites), changes of climate (temperature, 1 site; precipitation, 2 sites), soil hydrology (3 sites), harvest intensity (1 site), wood ash fertilisation (1 site), pH gradient in organic soil (1 site) and afforestation of cropland (1 site). <br><br> On average, N<sub>2</sub>O emissions increased by 0.06 ± 0.03 (range 0–0.3) g N<sub>2</sub>O-N m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> across all treatments on mineral soils, but the increase was up to 10 times higher in an acidic organic soil. Soil moisture together with mineral soil C / N ratio and pH were found to significantly influence N<sub>2</sub>O emissions across all treatments. Emissions were increased by elevated N deposition, especially in interaction with increased soil moisture. High pH reduced the formation of N<sub>2</sub>O, even under otherwise favourable soil conditions. <br><br> Oxidation (uptake) of CH<sub>4</sub> was on average reduced from 0.16 ± 0.02 to 0.04 ± 0.05 g CH<sub>4</sub>-C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> by the investigated treatments. The CH<sub>4</sub> exchange was significantly influenced by soil moisture and soil C / N ratio across all treatments, and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions occurred only in wet or water-saturated conditions. <br><br> For most of the investigated forest manipulations or natural gradients, the response of both N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes was towards reducing the overall GHG forest sink. The most resilient forests were dry Mediterranean forests, as well as forests with high soil C / N ratio or high soil pH. Mitigation strategies may focus on (i) sustainable management of wet forest areas and forested peatlands, (ii) continuous forest cover management, (iii) reducing atmospheric N input and, thus, N availability, and (iv) improving neutralisation capacity of acid soils (e.g. wood ash application).
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:21:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8dcf537ab3634826845eebe567eff9a0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:21:32Z
publishDate 2012-10-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Biogeosciences
spelling doaj.art-8dcf537ab3634826845eebe567eff9a02022-12-22T03:12:31ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892012-10-019103999401210.5194/bg-9-3999-2012The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in EuropeP. GundersenJ. R. ChristiansenG. AlbertiN. BrüggemannS. CastaldiR. GascheB. KitzlerL. KlemedtssonR. Lobo-do-ValeF. MoldanT. RüttingP. SchleppiP. WeslienS. Zechmeister-BoltensternForests in Europe are changing due to interactions between climate change, nitrogen (N) deposition and new forest management practices. The concurrent impact on the forest greenhouse gas (GHG) balance is at present difficult to predict due to a lack of knowledge on controlling factors of GHG fluxes and response to changes in these factors. To improve the mechanistic understanding of the ongoing changes, we studied the response of soil–atmosphere exchange of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) at twelve experimental or natural gradient forest sites, representing anticipated future forest change. The experimental manipulations, one or more per site, included N addition (4 sites), changes of climate (temperature, 1 site; precipitation, 2 sites), soil hydrology (3 sites), harvest intensity (1 site), wood ash fertilisation (1 site), pH gradient in organic soil (1 site) and afforestation of cropland (1 site). <br><br> On average, N<sub>2</sub>O emissions increased by 0.06 ± 0.03 (range 0–0.3) g N<sub>2</sub>O-N m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> across all treatments on mineral soils, but the increase was up to 10 times higher in an acidic organic soil. Soil moisture together with mineral soil C / N ratio and pH were found to significantly influence N<sub>2</sub>O emissions across all treatments. Emissions were increased by elevated N deposition, especially in interaction with increased soil moisture. High pH reduced the formation of N<sub>2</sub>O, even under otherwise favourable soil conditions. <br><br> Oxidation (uptake) of CH<sub>4</sub> was on average reduced from 0.16 ± 0.02 to 0.04 ± 0.05 g CH<sub>4</sub>-C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> by the investigated treatments. The CH<sub>4</sub> exchange was significantly influenced by soil moisture and soil C / N ratio across all treatments, and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions occurred only in wet or water-saturated conditions. <br><br> For most of the investigated forest manipulations or natural gradients, the response of both N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes was towards reducing the overall GHG forest sink. The most resilient forests were dry Mediterranean forests, as well as forests with high soil C / N ratio or high soil pH. Mitigation strategies may focus on (i) sustainable management of wet forest areas and forested peatlands, (ii) continuous forest cover management, (iii) reducing atmospheric N input and, thus, N availability, and (iv) improving neutralisation capacity of acid soils (e.g. wood ash application).http://www.biogeosciences.net/9/3999/2012/bg-9-3999-2012.pdf
spellingShingle P. Gundersen
J. R. Christiansen
G. Alberti
N. Brüggemann
S. Castaldi
R. Gasche
B. Kitzler
L. Klemedtsson
R. Lobo-do-Vale
F. Moldan
T. Rütting
P. Schleppi
P. Weslien
S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern
The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe
Biogeosciences
title The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe
title_full The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe
title_fullStr The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe
title_full_unstemmed The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe
title_short The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe
title_sort response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in europe
url http://www.biogeosciences.net/9/3999/2012/bg-9-3999-2012.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pgundersen theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT jrchristiansen theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT galberti theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT nbruggemann theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT scastaldi theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT rgasche theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT bkitzler theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT lklemedtsson theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT rlobodovale theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT fmoldan theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT trutting theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT pschleppi theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT pweslien theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT szechmeisterboltenstern theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT pgundersen responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT jrchristiansen responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT galberti responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT nbruggemann responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT scastaldi responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT rgasche responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT bkitzler responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT lklemedtsson responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT rlobodovale responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT fmoldan responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT trutting responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT pschleppi responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT pweslien responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope
AT szechmeisterboltenstern responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope