The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe
Forests in Europe are changing due to interactions between climate change, nitrogen (N) deposition and new forest management practices. The concurrent impact on the forest greenhouse gas (GHG) balance is at present difficult to predict due to a lack of knowledge on controlling factors of GHG fluxes...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2012-10-01
|
Series: | Biogeosciences |
Online Access: | http://www.biogeosciences.net/9/3999/2012/bg-9-3999-2012.pdf |
_version_ | 1811274518045392896 |
---|---|
author | P. Gundersen J. R. Christiansen G. Alberti N. Brüggemann S. Castaldi R. Gasche B. Kitzler L. Klemedtsson R. Lobo-do-Vale F. Moldan T. Rütting P. Schleppi P. Weslien S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern |
author_facet | P. Gundersen J. R. Christiansen G. Alberti N. Brüggemann S. Castaldi R. Gasche B. Kitzler L. Klemedtsson R. Lobo-do-Vale F. Moldan T. Rütting P. Schleppi P. Weslien S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern |
author_sort | P. Gundersen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Forests in Europe are changing due to interactions between climate change, nitrogen (N) deposition and new forest management practices. The concurrent impact on the forest greenhouse gas (GHG) balance is at present difficult to predict due to a lack of knowledge on controlling factors of GHG fluxes and response to changes in these factors. To improve the mechanistic understanding of the ongoing changes, we studied the response of soil–atmosphere exchange of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) at twelve experimental or natural gradient forest sites, representing anticipated future forest change. The experimental manipulations, one or more per site, included N addition (4 sites), changes of climate (temperature, 1 site; precipitation, 2 sites), soil hydrology (3 sites), harvest intensity (1 site), wood ash fertilisation (1 site), pH gradient in organic soil (1 site) and afforestation of cropland (1 site). <br><br> On average, N<sub>2</sub>O emissions increased by 0.06 &plusmn; 0.03 (range 0–0.3) g N<sub>2</sub>O-N m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> across all treatments on mineral soils, but the increase was up to 10 times higher in an acidic organic soil. Soil moisture together with mineral soil C / N ratio and pH were found to significantly influence N<sub>2</sub>O emissions across all treatments. Emissions were increased by elevated N deposition, especially in interaction with increased soil moisture. High pH reduced the formation of N<sub>2</sub>O, even under otherwise favourable soil conditions. <br><br> Oxidation (uptake) of CH<sub>4</sub> was on average reduced from 0.16 &plusmn; 0.02 to 0.04 &plusmn; 0.05 g CH<sub>4</sub>-C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> by the investigated treatments. The CH<sub>4</sub> exchange was significantly influenced by soil moisture and soil C / N ratio across all treatments, and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions occurred only in wet or water-saturated conditions. <br><br> For most of the investigated forest manipulations or natural gradients, the response of both N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes was towards reducing the overall GHG forest sink. The most resilient forests were dry Mediterranean forests, as well as forests with high soil C / N ratio or high soil pH. Mitigation strategies may focus on (i) sustainable management of wet forest areas and forested peatlands, (ii) continuous forest cover management, (iii) reducing atmospheric N input and, thus, N availability, and (iv) improving neutralisation capacity of acid soils (e.g. wood ash application). |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T23:21:32Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8dcf537ab3634826845eebe567eff9a0 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1726-4170 1726-4189 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T23:21:32Z |
publishDate | 2012-10-01 |
publisher | Copernicus Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Biogeosciences |
spelling | doaj.art-8dcf537ab3634826845eebe567eff9a02022-12-22T03:12:31ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892012-10-019103999401210.5194/bg-9-3999-2012The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in EuropeP. GundersenJ. R. ChristiansenG. AlbertiN. BrüggemannS. CastaldiR. GascheB. KitzlerL. KlemedtssonR. Lobo-do-ValeF. MoldanT. RüttingP. SchleppiP. WeslienS. Zechmeister-BoltensternForests in Europe are changing due to interactions between climate change, nitrogen (N) deposition and new forest management practices. The concurrent impact on the forest greenhouse gas (GHG) balance is at present difficult to predict due to a lack of knowledge on controlling factors of GHG fluxes and response to changes in these factors. To improve the mechanistic understanding of the ongoing changes, we studied the response of soil–atmosphere exchange of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) at twelve experimental or natural gradient forest sites, representing anticipated future forest change. The experimental manipulations, one or more per site, included N addition (4 sites), changes of climate (temperature, 1 site; precipitation, 2 sites), soil hydrology (3 sites), harvest intensity (1 site), wood ash fertilisation (1 site), pH gradient in organic soil (1 site) and afforestation of cropland (1 site). <br><br> On average, N<sub>2</sub>O emissions increased by 0.06 &plusmn; 0.03 (range 0–0.3) g N<sub>2</sub>O-N m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> across all treatments on mineral soils, but the increase was up to 10 times higher in an acidic organic soil. Soil moisture together with mineral soil C / N ratio and pH were found to significantly influence N<sub>2</sub>O emissions across all treatments. Emissions were increased by elevated N deposition, especially in interaction with increased soil moisture. High pH reduced the formation of N<sub>2</sub>O, even under otherwise favourable soil conditions. <br><br> Oxidation (uptake) of CH<sub>4</sub> was on average reduced from 0.16 &plusmn; 0.02 to 0.04 &plusmn; 0.05 g CH<sub>4</sub>-C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> by the investigated treatments. The CH<sub>4</sub> exchange was significantly influenced by soil moisture and soil C / N ratio across all treatments, and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions occurred only in wet or water-saturated conditions. <br><br> For most of the investigated forest manipulations or natural gradients, the response of both N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes was towards reducing the overall GHG forest sink. The most resilient forests were dry Mediterranean forests, as well as forests with high soil C / N ratio or high soil pH. Mitigation strategies may focus on (i) sustainable management of wet forest areas and forested peatlands, (ii) continuous forest cover management, (iii) reducing atmospheric N input and, thus, N availability, and (iv) improving neutralisation capacity of acid soils (e.g. wood ash application).http://www.biogeosciences.net/9/3999/2012/bg-9-3999-2012.pdf |
spellingShingle | P. Gundersen J. R. Christiansen G. Alberti N. Brüggemann S. Castaldi R. Gasche B. Kitzler L. Klemedtsson R. Lobo-do-Vale F. Moldan T. Rütting P. Schleppi P. Weslien S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe Biogeosciences |
title | The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe |
title_full | The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe |
title_fullStr | The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe |
title_full_unstemmed | The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe |
title_short | The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe |
title_sort | response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in europe |
url | http://www.biogeosciences.net/9/3999/2012/bg-9-3999-2012.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pgundersen theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT jrchristiansen theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT galberti theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT nbruggemann theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT scastaldi theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT rgasche theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT bkitzler theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT lklemedtsson theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT rlobodovale theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT fmoldan theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT trutting theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT pschleppi theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT pweslien theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT szechmeisterboltenstern theresponseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT pgundersen responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT jrchristiansen responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT galberti responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT nbruggemann responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT scastaldi responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT rgasche responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT bkitzler responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT lklemedtsson responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT rlobodovale responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT fmoldan responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT trutting responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT pschleppi responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT pweslien responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope AT szechmeisterboltenstern responseofmethaneandnitrousoxidefluxestoforestchangeineurope |