O relacjach humanistyki i zarządzania: mezalians to czy szczęśliwy związek?
The text discusses the relations between humanities and management sciences. The basic assumptions presented in the article concern interpretation capabilities of management processes in terms of: “management means changing” and “management means bonds creation”. Changing refers to both quantitati...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
2013-12-01
|
| Series: | Problemy Zarządzania |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/resources/html/article/details?id=166762 |
| _version_ | 1811271424997851136 |
|---|---|
| author | Katarzyna Barańska |
| author_facet | Katarzyna Barańska |
| author_sort | Katarzyna Barańska |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The text discusses the relations between humanities and management sciences. The basic assumptions
presented in the article concern interpretation capabilities of management processes in terms of: “management
means changing” and “management means bonds creation”. Changing refers to both quantitative
and qualitative dimensions – here one can perceive the connections between complementary economic and
humanistic descriptions. It is important to draw attention exceeding a current point of view in which the
organization is regarded as a system. Instead, it is suggested that one should look at the consequences
and responsibilities of organization management regarded as a cultural (and non-cultural) system. The
text refers to the concept of Actor-Network Theory by Bruno Latour, in which the emphasis is put on the
fact of the permanent formation of society (and culture), instead of regarding it as stable and completed.
Creating bonds is thus a fundamental task and a consequence of management, whereas the force defining
the areas and contexts of created bonds are values respected by individuals and groups. A comprehensive
approach to this problem implies the treatment of man as homo axiologicus. In the article references to
the conceptions of management theory are indicated, as well as the possibility of adopting humanistic
perspective to management theory. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T22:19:48Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8dd670e253ec49868b34225433a14fe2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1644-9584 2300-8792 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T22:19:48Z |
| publishDate | 2013-12-01 |
| publisher | Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Problemy Zarządzania |
| spelling | doaj.art-8dd670e253ec49868b34225433a14fe22022-12-22T03:14:24ZengWydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu WarszawskiegoProblemy Zarządzania1644-95842300-87922013-12-0111nr 4 (44)3344DOI:10.7172/1644-9584.44.3O relacjach humanistyki i zarządzania: mezalians to czy szczęśliwy związek?Katarzyna Barańska0Instytut Kultury, Wydział Zarządzania i Komunikacji Społecznej, Uniwersytet JagiellońskiThe text discusses the relations between humanities and management sciences. The basic assumptions presented in the article concern interpretation capabilities of management processes in terms of: “management means changing” and “management means bonds creation”. Changing refers to both quantitative and qualitative dimensions – here one can perceive the connections between complementary economic and humanistic descriptions. It is important to draw attention exceeding a current point of view in which the organization is regarded as a system. Instead, it is suggested that one should look at the consequences and responsibilities of organization management regarded as a cultural (and non-cultural) system. The text refers to the concept of Actor-Network Theory by Bruno Latour, in which the emphasis is put on the fact of the permanent formation of society (and culture), instead of regarding it as stable and completed. Creating bonds is thus a fundamental task and a consequence of management, whereas the force defining the areas and contexts of created bonds are values respected by individuals and groups. A comprehensive approach to this problem implies the treatment of man as homo axiologicus. In the article references to the conceptions of management theory are indicated, as well as the possibility of adopting humanistic perspective to management theory.https://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/resources/html/article/details?id=166762humanitiesmanagementactor-network theorythe system of culturehomo axiologicus |
| spellingShingle | Katarzyna Barańska O relacjach humanistyki i zarządzania: mezalians to czy szczęśliwy związek? Problemy Zarządzania humanities management actor-network theory the system of culture homo axiologicus |
| title | O relacjach humanistyki i zarządzania: mezalians to czy szczęśliwy związek? |
| title_full | O relacjach humanistyki i zarządzania: mezalians to czy szczęśliwy związek? |
| title_fullStr | O relacjach humanistyki i zarządzania: mezalians to czy szczęśliwy związek? |
| title_full_unstemmed | O relacjach humanistyki i zarządzania: mezalians to czy szczęśliwy związek? |
| title_short | O relacjach humanistyki i zarządzania: mezalians to czy szczęśliwy związek? |
| title_sort | o relacjach humanistyki i zarzadzania mezalians to czy szczesliwy zwiazek |
| topic | humanities management actor-network theory the system of culture homo axiologicus |
| url | https://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/resources/html/article/details?id=166762 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT katarzynabaranska orelacjachhumanistykiizarzadzaniamezalianstoczyszczesliwyzwiazek |