Debate: Use of the Term ‘Bonded Labour’ is a Must in the Context of India

There is no question that we should distinguish between forced labour, trafficking and slavery. But, we should also include in the debate another concept, ‘bonded labour,’ as it describes a distinct and widespread form of forced labour in India that does not fully accord with the International Labou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kiran Kamal Prasad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women 2015-09-01
Series:Anti-Trafficking Review
Online Access:https://antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/142
_version_ 1797838252077481984
author Kiran Kamal Prasad
author_facet Kiran Kamal Prasad
author_sort Kiran Kamal Prasad
collection DOAJ
description There is no question that we should distinguish between forced labour, trafficking and slavery. But, we should also include in the debate another concept, ‘bonded labour,’ as it describes a distinct and widespread form of forced labour in India that does not fully accord with the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) definition of forced labour. The sociopolitical reality in India and bonded labour’s intimate link with the Indian caste system demand that the term ‘bonded labour’ be retained in the discourse on forced labour and trafficking in persons. Addressing bonded labour enables two interconnected areas of exploitation and discrimination to be addressed, namely working towards emancipation of the minority Dalit community and of the Moolnivasi indigenous communities.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:38:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8dda13a46f334233988c4ab3ba57821e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2286-7511
2287-0113
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:38:56Z
publishDate 2015-09-01
publisher Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women
record_format Article
series Anti-Trafficking Review
spelling doaj.art-8dda13a46f334233988c4ab3ba57821e2023-04-27T16:09:23ZengGlobal Alliance Against Traffic in WomenAnti-Trafficking Review2286-75112287-01132015-09-01510.14197/atr.201215513114Debate: Use of the Term ‘Bonded Labour’ is a Must in the Context of IndiaKiran Kamal PrasadThere is no question that we should distinguish between forced labour, trafficking and slavery. But, we should also include in the debate another concept, ‘bonded labour,’ as it describes a distinct and widespread form of forced labour in India that does not fully accord with the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) definition of forced labour. The sociopolitical reality in India and bonded labour’s intimate link with the Indian caste system demand that the term ‘bonded labour’ be retained in the discourse on forced labour and trafficking in persons. Addressing bonded labour enables two interconnected areas of exploitation and discrimination to be addressed, namely working towards emancipation of the minority Dalit community and of the Moolnivasi indigenous communities.https://antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/142
spellingShingle Kiran Kamal Prasad
Debate: Use of the Term ‘Bonded Labour’ is a Must in the Context of India
Anti-Trafficking Review
title Debate: Use of the Term ‘Bonded Labour’ is a Must in the Context of India
title_full Debate: Use of the Term ‘Bonded Labour’ is a Must in the Context of India
title_fullStr Debate: Use of the Term ‘Bonded Labour’ is a Must in the Context of India
title_full_unstemmed Debate: Use of the Term ‘Bonded Labour’ is a Must in the Context of India
title_short Debate: Use of the Term ‘Bonded Labour’ is a Must in the Context of India
title_sort debate use of the term bonded labour is a must in the context of india
url https://antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/142
work_keys_str_mv AT kirankamalprasad debateuseofthetermbondedlabourisamustinthecontextofindia