Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa
While modern biotechnology and, specifically, genetic modification are subject of debate in many parts of the world, an increasing number of countries in Sub-Sahara Africa are making important strides towards authorizing general releases of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties for use by farmers...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Plant Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2020.00130/full |
_version_ | 1818175216156672000 |
---|---|
author | John Komen Leena Tripathi Boniface Mkoko Daniel Osei Ofosu Herbert Oloka Doris Wangari |
author_facet | John Komen Leena Tripathi Boniface Mkoko Daniel Osei Ofosu Herbert Oloka Doris Wangari |
author_sort | John Komen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | While modern biotechnology and, specifically, genetic modification are subject of debate in many parts of the world, an increasing number of countries in Sub-Sahara Africa are making important strides towards authorizing general releases of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties for use by farmers and agribusinesses. Obviously, the documented economic and environmental benefits from planting GM crops—based on a track record of over two decades—are a major driver in the decision-making process. Another key factor is the increasing alignment of biosafety regulatory policies with progressive agricultural and rural development policies in Africa, resulting in—compared to past experiences—greater emphasis on anticipated benefits rather than risks in biosafety regulatory reviews. In several cases, this has led to expedited reviews of GM crop release applications, either for confined field trials or general environmental release, taking experiences and data from other countries into account. Such regulatory approaches hold promise as the pipeline of relevant, pro-poor GM crop applications is expanding as are the opportunities provided by novel plant breeding techniques. This review article analyses the shifting policy context in select African economies, resulting in adoption of new agricultural technology, and novel regulatory approaches used in biosafety decision-making. Case studies will be presented for Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria and Uganda to analyze challenges, distill lessons learned and to present general policy recommendations for emerging economies. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T19:56:46Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8ddbae91066249fc8a0fd137b791b896 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-462X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T19:56:46Z |
publishDate | 2020-03-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Plant Science |
spelling | doaj.art-8ddbae91066249fc8a0fd137b791b8962022-12-22T00:52:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2020-03-011110.3389/fpls.2020.00130497930Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara AfricaJohn Komen0Leena Tripathi1Boniface Mkoko2Daniel Osei Ofosu3Herbert Oloka4Doris Wangari5Komen Bioscience Consultancy, Haarlem, NetherlandsInternational Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Plant Biotechnology, Nairobi, KenyaProgram for Biosafety Systems, Lilongwe, MalawiBiotechnology and Nuclear Agriculture Research Institute, Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Accra, GhanaProgram for Biosafety Systems, Kampala, UgandaProgram for Biosafety Systems, Nairobi, KenyaWhile modern biotechnology and, specifically, genetic modification are subject of debate in many parts of the world, an increasing number of countries in Sub-Sahara Africa are making important strides towards authorizing general releases of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties for use by farmers and agribusinesses. Obviously, the documented economic and environmental benefits from planting GM crops—based on a track record of over two decades—are a major driver in the decision-making process. Another key factor is the increasing alignment of biosafety regulatory policies with progressive agricultural and rural development policies in Africa, resulting in—compared to past experiences—greater emphasis on anticipated benefits rather than risks in biosafety regulatory reviews. In several cases, this has led to expedited reviews of GM crop release applications, either for confined field trials or general environmental release, taking experiences and data from other countries into account. Such regulatory approaches hold promise as the pipeline of relevant, pro-poor GM crop applications is expanding as are the opportunities provided by novel plant breeding techniques. This review article analyses the shifting policy context in select African economies, resulting in adoption of new agricultural technology, and novel regulatory approaches used in biosafety decision-making. Case studies will be presented for Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria and Uganda to analyze challenges, distill lessons learned and to present general policy recommendations for emerging economies.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2020.00130/fullpolicy & institutional actionsbiotechnologybiosafety analysisregulationgenome editing |
spellingShingle | John Komen Leena Tripathi Boniface Mkoko Daniel Osei Ofosu Herbert Oloka Doris Wangari Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa Frontiers in Plant Science policy & institutional actions biotechnology biosafety analysis regulation genome editing |
title | Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa |
title_full | Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa |
title_fullStr | Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa |
title_short | Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa |
title_sort | biosafety regulatory reviews and leeway to operate case studies from sub sahara africa |
topic | policy & institutional actions biotechnology biosafety analysis regulation genome editing |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2020.00130/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnkomen biosafetyregulatoryreviewsandleewaytooperatecasestudiesfromsubsaharaafrica AT leenatripathi biosafetyregulatoryreviewsandleewaytooperatecasestudiesfromsubsaharaafrica AT bonifacemkoko biosafetyregulatoryreviewsandleewaytooperatecasestudiesfromsubsaharaafrica AT danieloseiofosu biosafetyregulatoryreviewsandleewaytooperatecasestudiesfromsubsaharaafrica AT herbertoloka biosafetyregulatoryreviewsandleewaytooperatecasestudiesfromsubsaharaafrica AT doriswangari biosafetyregulatoryreviewsandleewaytooperatecasestudiesfromsubsaharaafrica |