Summary: | This study presents a novel perspective for improving the understanding of permeable structures at geothermal prospects by jointly diagnosing the responses of conventional pressure transient and tracer testing. The pressure and tracer responses individually yield apparent porosity–thickness products. The difference between them implies the existence of unknown dead-end features involved in a reservoir model. Laboratory experiments and numerical simulations validate this concept. Potential application to hypothetical exploration demonstrates that the logarithmic ratio of the porosity–thickness products, determined based on pressure and tracer responses, indicates the accuracy of the reservoir model to be successively updated with the progress of the exploration. The reservoir model successfully reproduced the synthetic observations regardless of the accuracy of permeable structure if different porosity–thickness products were allowed to be assumed to individually reproduce pressure and tracer responses. These porosity–thickness products coincided only if the reservoir model correctly captured the permeable structure. This novel perspective will provide strategic guides for successful exploration and development at the prospects of geothermal and, potentially, general geofluid resources.
|