A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteroscopic Extraction of Upper Ureteric Calculus: A Prospective Study

Background: The daily practice of urology includes managing patients with urolithiasis, and there are various methods for managing ureteral calculi. There are many techniques for fragmenting stones. The holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet [Ho: YAG] laser is often utilized in stone disintegration proced...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammed Ahmed, Amany Soliman, Refaat Awad, Adel Hussein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta) 2022-08-01
Series:International Journal of Medical Arts
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijma.journals.ekb.eg/article_257911_3a32a1c214131ebd2ffa167be235d77b.pdf
_version_ 1797364443597766656
author Mohammed Ahmed
Amany Soliman
Refaat Awad
Adel Hussein
author_facet Mohammed Ahmed
Amany Soliman
Refaat Awad
Adel Hussein
author_sort Mohammed Ahmed
collection DOAJ
description Background: The daily practice of urology includes managing patients with urolithiasis, and there are various methods for managing ureteral calculi. There are many techniques for fragmenting stones. The holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet [Ho: YAG] laser is often utilized in stone disintegration procedures.Aim of the work: This research compares the effectiveness of laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in treating patients with upper ureteric calculi regarding the percentage of patients who remain stone-free, hospital stays, surgical times, and complications.Patients and methods: Sixty individuals with upper ureteric calculus participated in this prospective comparative analysis. From February 2021 to March 2022, the patients were randomly divided into two groups [Laser Lithotripsy and Pneumatic Lithotripsy]. The main goals of both treatments were to break the stone into pieces smaller than 3 mm, which was confirmed by an X-ray [KUB] on the first post-operative day.Results: The study's eligibility criteria were met by 60 individuals with upper ureteric stones [30 in the pneumatic group and 30 in the laser group]. In laser lithotripsy, the immediately stone-free rate was 93.3 percent, while in pneumatic lithotripsy, it was 70.0 percent [p value 0.059]. Proximal migration was 6.7% in Laser Lithotripsy and 26.6% in Pneumatic Lithotripsy [p > 0.038]. Pneumatic lithotripsy had a substantially longer operating time than laser lithotripsy [27.83±6.11 min vs. 24.47±5.08 min; p=0.024]. There were no statistically substantial variations between the two groups regarding the patients' age, sex, stone size, length of hospitalization, and complications.Conclusion: Laser and pneumatic lithotripsy are safe and effective in the treatment of upper ureteric stone with few minor complications; however, laser lithotripsy has a better stone free rate, less operative time, less fluid irrigated and less upward stone migration than pneumatic lithotripsy.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T16:35:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8de782cb902d4ae5bf0268e22f625057
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2636-4174
2682-3780
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T16:35:25Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta)
record_format Article
series International Journal of Medical Arts
spelling doaj.art-8de782cb902d4ae5bf0268e22f6250572024-01-05T19:38:49ZengAl-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta)International Journal of Medical Arts2636-41742682-37802022-08-01482550255710.21608/ijma.2022.145395.1466257911A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteroscopic Extraction of Upper Ureteric Calculus: A Prospective StudyMohammed Ahmed0Amany Soliman1Refaat Awad2Adel Hussein3Department of Urology, Kobry El Koba Military Hospital, Ministry of Defense, Cairo, EgyptDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine [for girls], Al-Azhar University, Cairo, EgyptDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine [for girls], Al-Azhar University, Cairo, EgyptDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine [for girls], Al-Azhar University, Cairo, EgyptBackground: The daily practice of urology includes managing patients with urolithiasis, and there are various methods for managing ureteral calculi. There are many techniques for fragmenting stones. The holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet [Ho: YAG] laser is often utilized in stone disintegration procedures.Aim of the work: This research compares the effectiveness of laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in treating patients with upper ureteric calculi regarding the percentage of patients who remain stone-free, hospital stays, surgical times, and complications.Patients and methods: Sixty individuals with upper ureteric calculus participated in this prospective comparative analysis. From February 2021 to March 2022, the patients were randomly divided into two groups [Laser Lithotripsy and Pneumatic Lithotripsy]. The main goals of both treatments were to break the stone into pieces smaller than 3 mm, which was confirmed by an X-ray [KUB] on the first post-operative day.Results: The study's eligibility criteria were met by 60 individuals with upper ureteric stones [30 in the pneumatic group and 30 in the laser group]. In laser lithotripsy, the immediately stone-free rate was 93.3 percent, while in pneumatic lithotripsy, it was 70.0 percent [p value 0.059]. Proximal migration was 6.7% in Laser Lithotripsy and 26.6% in Pneumatic Lithotripsy [p > 0.038]. Pneumatic lithotripsy had a substantially longer operating time than laser lithotripsy [27.83±6.11 min vs. 24.47±5.08 min; p=0.024]. There were no statistically substantial variations between the two groups regarding the patients' age, sex, stone size, length of hospitalization, and complications.Conclusion: Laser and pneumatic lithotripsy are safe and effective in the treatment of upper ureteric stone with few minor complications; however, laser lithotripsy has a better stone free rate, less operative time, less fluid irrigated and less upward stone migration than pneumatic lithotripsy.https://ijma.journals.ekb.eg/article_257911_3a32a1c214131ebd2ffa167be235d77b.pdfpneumatic lithotripsylaser lithotripsystone free rateproximal migration
spellingShingle Mohammed Ahmed
Amany Soliman
Refaat Awad
Adel Hussein
A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteroscopic Extraction of Upper Ureteric Calculus: A Prospective Study
International Journal of Medical Arts
pneumatic lithotripsy
laser lithotripsy
stone free rate
proximal migration
title A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteroscopic Extraction of Upper Ureteric Calculus: A Prospective Study
title_full A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteroscopic Extraction of Upper Ureteric Calculus: A Prospective Study
title_fullStr A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteroscopic Extraction of Upper Ureteric Calculus: A Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteroscopic Extraction of Upper Ureteric Calculus: A Prospective Study
title_short A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteroscopic Extraction of Upper Ureteric Calculus: A Prospective Study
title_sort comparative study between pneumatic and laser lithotripsy for ureteroscopic extraction of upper ureteric calculus a prospective study
topic pneumatic lithotripsy
laser lithotripsy
stone free rate
proximal migration
url https://ijma.journals.ekb.eg/article_257911_3a32a1c214131ebd2ffa167be235d77b.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedahmed acomparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforureteroscopicextractionofupperuretericcalculusaprospectivestudy
AT amanysoliman acomparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforureteroscopicextractionofupperuretericcalculusaprospectivestudy
AT refaatawad acomparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforureteroscopicextractionofupperuretericcalculusaprospectivestudy
AT adelhussein acomparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforureteroscopicextractionofupperuretericcalculusaprospectivestudy
AT mohammedahmed comparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforureteroscopicextractionofupperuretericcalculusaprospectivestudy
AT amanysoliman comparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforureteroscopicextractionofupperuretericcalculusaprospectivestudy
AT refaatawad comparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforureteroscopicextractionofupperuretericcalculusaprospectivestudy
AT adelhussein comparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforureteroscopicextractionofupperuretericcalculusaprospectivestudy