Effects of a vibrational proprioceptive stimulation on recovery phase after maximal incremental cycle test
Global Proprioceptive Resonance (GPR) is a recently developed approach conceived to solicit the various cutaneous mechanoreceptors, through application of mechanical multifocal vibration at low amplitude and at definite body sites, limiting the stimulation of the profound structures. This interventi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
PAGEPress Publications
2020-11-01
|
| Series: | European Journal of Translational Myology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://pagepressjournals.org/index.php/bam/article/view/9477 |
| _version_ | 1819037529080332288 |
|---|---|
| author | Francesco Coscia Paola V. Gigliotti Saadsaoud Foued Alexander Piratinskij Tiziana Pietrangelo Vittore Verratti Igor Diemberger Giorgio Fanò-Illic |
| author_facet | Francesco Coscia Paola V. Gigliotti Saadsaoud Foued Alexander Piratinskij Tiziana Pietrangelo Vittore Verratti Igor Diemberger Giorgio Fanò-Illic |
| author_sort | Francesco Coscia |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Global Proprioceptive Resonance (GPR) is a recently developed approach conceived to solicit the various cutaneous mechanoreceptors, through application of mechanical multifocal vibration at low amplitude and at definite body sites, limiting the stimulation of the profound structures. This interventional study evaluated the effects of GPR on cardiorespiratory function during the post-exertional recovery period. A group of volunteers involved in Triathlon (a multisport discipline consisting of sequential swim, cycle, and run disciplines higly demanding in terms of metabolic engagment), underwent two maximal incremental exercise tests until exhaustion followed alternatively to (a) a 13 minutes section of GPR or (b) a standard low intensity exercise acute trend of the same duration. These effects of these two approaches were compared in terms of recovery of: heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and venous lactate concentration (Lac). The physiological parameters (HR, RR, SpO2 and Lac) recorded in the pre-exertion session showed similar values between the 40 volunteers while several differences were recorded in the post-exertion phase. After 6 min of GPR recovery it was recorded a drop in RR below baseline (19.4±4.15 min-1 vs. 12.2± 0.4 min-1; p<0.001) coupled with an increase in peripheral oxygen saturation above the baseline (GPR: 99.0%±0.16% vs. 96.6%±0.77%, p<0.001). Moreover, the most striking result was the drop in lactate concentration measured after 13 min of GPR recovery: 84.5±3.5% in GPR vs 2.9±7.6% reduction in standard recovery (p<0.001). Notably no differences were recorded recovery of heart rate. GPR has promising effects on post-exercise recovery on RR, SpO2 and lactate level on young athletes. Key Words: global proprioceptive resonance, recovery phase, incremental test. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T08:22:52Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8df7029e1685406dbb2629195c44b05a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2037-7452 2037-7460 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T08:22:52Z |
| publishDate | 2020-11-01 |
| publisher | PAGEPress Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | European Journal of Translational Myology |
| spelling | doaj.art-8df7029e1685406dbb2629195c44b05a2022-12-21T19:10:23ZengPAGEPress PublicationsEuropean Journal of Translational Myology2037-74522037-74602020-11-0110.4081/ejtm.2020.9477Effects of a vibrational proprioceptive stimulation on recovery phase after maximal incremental cycle testFrancesco Coscia0Paola V. Gigliotti1Saadsaoud Foued2Alexander Piratinskij3Tiziana Pietrangelo4Vittore Verratti5Igor Diemberger6Giorgio Fanò-Illic7Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Ospedale “Santa Maria della Misericordia”; Laboratory of Sport Physiology, San Candido-InnichenDepartment of Medicine, University of Perugia, Ospedale “Santa Maria della Misericordia”; Laboratory of Sport Physiology, San Candido-InnichenMaitre de Conference Class A, Universite de MsilaThe Ural Federal University, EkaterinburgDepartment of Neuroscience Imaging and Clinical Science, Interuniversity Institute of Myology, University G d’Annunzio Chieti-PescaraDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Health and Territory, University “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, ChietiInstitute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-MalpighiIIM-Interuniversity Institute of Myology; A&C M-C Foundation for Translational Myology, Padova; Free University of Alcatraz, Santa Cristina di GubbioGlobal Proprioceptive Resonance (GPR) is a recently developed approach conceived to solicit the various cutaneous mechanoreceptors, through application of mechanical multifocal vibration at low amplitude and at definite body sites, limiting the stimulation of the profound structures. This interventional study evaluated the effects of GPR on cardiorespiratory function during the post-exertional recovery period. A group of volunteers involved in Triathlon (a multisport discipline consisting of sequential swim, cycle, and run disciplines higly demanding in terms of metabolic engagment), underwent two maximal incremental exercise tests until exhaustion followed alternatively to (a) a 13 minutes section of GPR or (b) a standard low intensity exercise acute trend of the same duration. These effects of these two approaches were compared in terms of recovery of: heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and venous lactate concentration (Lac). The physiological parameters (HR, RR, SpO2 and Lac) recorded in the pre-exertion session showed similar values between the 40 volunteers while several differences were recorded in the post-exertion phase. After 6 min of GPR recovery it was recorded a drop in RR below baseline (19.4±4.15 min-1 vs. 12.2± 0.4 min-1; p<0.001) coupled with an increase in peripheral oxygen saturation above the baseline (GPR: 99.0%±0.16% vs. 96.6%±0.77%, p<0.001). Moreover, the most striking result was the drop in lactate concentration measured after 13 min of GPR recovery: 84.5±3.5% in GPR vs 2.9±7.6% reduction in standard recovery (p<0.001). Notably no differences were recorded recovery of heart rate. GPR has promising effects on post-exercise recovery on RR, SpO2 and lactate level on young athletes. Key Words: global proprioceptive resonance, recovery phase, incremental test.https://pagepressjournals.org/index.php/bam/article/view/9477global proprioceptive resonancerecovery phaseincremental test |
| spellingShingle | Francesco Coscia Paola V. Gigliotti Saadsaoud Foued Alexander Piratinskij Tiziana Pietrangelo Vittore Verratti Igor Diemberger Giorgio Fanò-Illic Effects of a vibrational proprioceptive stimulation on recovery phase after maximal incremental cycle test European Journal of Translational Myology global proprioceptive resonance recovery phase incremental test |
| title | Effects of a vibrational proprioceptive stimulation on recovery phase after maximal incremental cycle test |
| title_full | Effects of a vibrational proprioceptive stimulation on recovery phase after maximal incremental cycle test |
| title_fullStr | Effects of a vibrational proprioceptive stimulation on recovery phase after maximal incremental cycle test |
| title_full_unstemmed | Effects of a vibrational proprioceptive stimulation on recovery phase after maximal incremental cycle test |
| title_short | Effects of a vibrational proprioceptive stimulation on recovery phase after maximal incremental cycle test |
| title_sort | effects of a vibrational proprioceptive stimulation on recovery phase after maximal incremental cycle test |
| topic | global proprioceptive resonance recovery phase incremental test |
| url | https://pagepressjournals.org/index.php/bam/article/view/9477 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT francescocoscia effectsofavibrationalproprioceptivestimulationonrecoveryphaseaftermaximalincrementalcycletest AT paolavgigliotti effectsofavibrationalproprioceptivestimulationonrecoveryphaseaftermaximalincrementalcycletest AT saadsaoudfoued effectsofavibrationalproprioceptivestimulationonrecoveryphaseaftermaximalincrementalcycletest AT alexanderpiratinskij effectsofavibrationalproprioceptivestimulationonrecoveryphaseaftermaximalincrementalcycletest AT tizianapietrangelo effectsofavibrationalproprioceptivestimulationonrecoveryphaseaftermaximalincrementalcycletest AT vittoreverratti effectsofavibrationalproprioceptivestimulationonrecoveryphaseaftermaximalincrementalcycletest AT igordiemberger effectsofavibrationalproprioceptivestimulationonrecoveryphaseaftermaximalincrementalcycletest AT giorgiofanoillic effectsofavibrationalproprioceptivestimulationonrecoveryphaseaftermaximalincrementalcycletest |