Design principles of a microtubule polymerase

Stu2/XMAP215 microtubule polymerases use multiple tubulin-binding TOG domains and a lattice-binding basic region to processively promote faster elongation. How the domain composition and organization of these proteins dictate polymerase activity, end localization, and processivity is unknown. We sho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisabeth A Geyer, Matthew P Miller, Chad A Brautigam, Sue Biggins, Luke M Rice
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2018-06-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/34574
_version_ 1811253382110773248
author Elisabeth A Geyer
Matthew P Miller
Chad A Brautigam
Sue Biggins
Luke M Rice
author_facet Elisabeth A Geyer
Matthew P Miller
Chad A Brautigam
Sue Biggins
Luke M Rice
author_sort Elisabeth A Geyer
collection DOAJ
description Stu2/XMAP215 microtubule polymerases use multiple tubulin-binding TOG domains and a lattice-binding basic region to processively promote faster elongation. How the domain composition and organization of these proteins dictate polymerase activity, end localization, and processivity is unknown. We show that polymerase activity does not require different kinds of TOGs, nor are there strict requirements for how the TOGs are linked. We identify an unexpected antagonism between the tubulin-binding TOGs and the lattice-binding basic region: lattice binding by the basic region is weak when at least two TOGs engage tubulins, strong when TOGs are empty. End-localization of Stu2 requires unpolymerized tubulin, at least two TOGs, and polymerase competence. We propose a ‘ratcheting’ model for processivity: transfer of tubulin from TOGs to the lattice activates the basic region, retaining the polymerase at the end for subsequent rounds of tubulin binding and incorporation. These results clarify design principles of the polymerase.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T16:50:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8e0e666aeea8494aa1a4e50021c19aa5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-084X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T16:50:04Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
record_format Article
series eLife
spelling doaj.art-8e0e666aeea8494aa1a4e50021c19aa52022-12-22T03:24:26ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2018-06-01710.7554/eLife.34574Design principles of a microtubule polymeraseElisabeth A Geyer0Matthew P Miller1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2012-7546Chad A Brautigam2Sue Biggins3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-6319Luke M Rice4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6551-3307Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United StatesHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United StatesDepartments of Biophysics and Microbiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United StatesHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United StatesDepartments of Biophysics and Biochemistry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United StatesStu2/XMAP215 microtubule polymerases use multiple tubulin-binding TOG domains and a lattice-binding basic region to processively promote faster elongation. How the domain composition and organization of these proteins dictate polymerase activity, end localization, and processivity is unknown. We show that polymerase activity does not require different kinds of TOGs, nor are there strict requirements for how the TOGs are linked. We identify an unexpected antagonism between the tubulin-binding TOGs and the lattice-binding basic region: lattice binding by the basic region is weak when at least two TOGs engage tubulins, strong when TOGs are empty. End-localization of Stu2 requires unpolymerized tubulin, at least two TOGs, and polymerase competence. We propose a ‘ratcheting’ model for processivity: transfer of tubulin from TOGs to the lattice activates the basic region, retaining the polymerase at the end for subsequent rounds of tubulin binding and incorporation. These results clarify design principles of the polymerase.https://elifesciences.org/articles/34574Microtubule dynamicsMicrotubule polymeraseIn vitro reconstitution
spellingShingle Elisabeth A Geyer
Matthew P Miller
Chad A Brautigam
Sue Biggins
Luke M Rice
Design principles of a microtubule polymerase
eLife
Microtubule dynamics
Microtubule polymerase
In vitro reconstitution
title Design principles of a microtubule polymerase
title_full Design principles of a microtubule polymerase
title_fullStr Design principles of a microtubule polymerase
title_full_unstemmed Design principles of a microtubule polymerase
title_short Design principles of a microtubule polymerase
title_sort design principles of a microtubule polymerase
topic Microtubule dynamics
Microtubule polymerase
In vitro reconstitution
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/34574
work_keys_str_mv AT elisabethageyer designprinciplesofamicrotubulepolymerase
AT matthewpmiller designprinciplesofamicrotubulepolymerase
AT chadabrautigam designprinciplesofamicrotubulepolymerase
AT suebiggins designprinciplesofamicrotubulepolymerase
AT lukemrice designprinciplesofamicrotubulepolymerase