Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar Measurements

Performance indexes obtained in idealized simulated scenarios are the primary source of data for evaluating different target tracking algorithms in most researches presented in the literature. Despite the convenience of simulation, ultimate evaluation of a tracking algorithm must be made in real sce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcelo Lucena de Souza, Alberto Gaspar Guimarães, Ernesto Leite Pinto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE) 2016-04-01
Series:Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jatm.com.br/ojs/index.php/jatm/article/view/588
_version_ 1818012335173795840
author Marcelo Lucena de Souza
Alberto Gaspar Guimarães
Ernesto Leite Pinto
author_facet Marcelo Lucena de Souza
Alberto Gaspar Guimarães
Ernesto Leite Pinto
author_sort Marcelo Lucena de Souza
collection DOAJ
description Performance indexes obtained in idealized simulated scenarios are the primary source of data for evaluating different target tracking algorithms in most researches presented in the literature. Despite the convenience of simulation, ultimate evaluation of a tracking algorithm must be made in real scenarios. Unfortunately, real radar measurements as well as accurate aircraft position, necessary for calculating tracking errors, are not easily available. In this paper, we present an evaluation of the well-known Interacting Multiple-Model with Probabilistic Data Association Filtering algorithm using data obtained from a flight inspection of a Brazilian Air Force ground-based long-range surveillance radar. The presented results show that, in this scenario the Interacting Multiple-Model with Probabilistic Data Association Filtering algorithm performance using real data is worse compared to simulation. Statistical properties of the real radar measurements are also investigated, and some evidence is found that embedded noise is not well modeled as perfectly white.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T06:19:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8e151f5a2b5348e090e74e7d81a7f8ba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1984-9648
2175-9146
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T06:19:56Z
publishDate 2016-04-01
publisher Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE)
record_format Article
series Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management
spelling doaj.art-8e151f5a2b5348e090e74e7d81a7f8ba2022-12-22T02:08:05ZengInstituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE)Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management1984-96482175-91462016-04-018214315110.5028/jatm.v8i2.588Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar MeasurementsMarcelo Lucena de Souza0Alberto Gaspar Guimarães1Ernesto Leite Pinto2Força Aérea Brasileira – Departamento de Controle do Espaço Aéreo – Parque de Material de Eletrônica da AeronáuticaExército Brasileiro – Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia – Instituto Militar de EngenhariaExército Brasileiro – Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia – Instituto Militar de EngenhariaPerformance indexes obtained in idealized simulated scenarios are the primary source of data for evaluating different target tracking algorithms in most researches presented in the literature. Despite the convenience of simulation, ultimate evaluation of a tracking algorithm must be made in real scenarios. Unfortunately, real radar measurements as well as accurate aircraft position, necessary for calculating tracking errors, are not easily available. In this paper, we present an evaluation of the well-known Interacting Multiple-Model with Probabilistic Data Association Filtering algorithm using data obtained from a flight inspection of a Brazilian Air Force ground-based long-range surveillance radar. The presented results show that, in this scenario the Interacting Multiple-Model with Probabilistic Data Association Filtering algorithm performance using real data is worse compared to simulation. Statistical properties of the real radar measurements are also investigated, and some evidence is found that embedded noise is not well modeled as perfectly white.http://www.jatm.com.br/ojs/index.php/jatm/article/view/588Radar trackingState estimationData simulationRadar data
spellingShingle Marcelo Lucena de Souza
Alberto Gaspar Guimarães
Ernesto Leite Pinto
Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar Measurements
Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management
Radar tracking
State estimation
Data simulation
Radar data
title Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar Measurements
title_full Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar Measurements
title_fullStr Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar Measurements
title_short Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar Measurements
title_sort performance comparison of the immpdaf algorithm using real and simulated radar measurements
topic Radar tracking
State estimation
Data simulation
Radar data
url http://www.jatm.com.br/ojs/index.php/jatm/article/view/588
work_keys_str_mv AT marcelolucenadesouza performancecomparisonoftheimmpdafalgorithmusingrealandsimulatedradarmeasurements
AT albertogasparguimaraes performancecomparisonoftheimmpdafalgorithmusingrealandsimulatedradarmeasurements
AT ernestoleitepinto performancecomparisonoftheimmpdafalgorithmusingrealandsimulatedradarmeasurements