Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar Measurements
Performance indexes obtained in idealized simulated scenarios are the primary source of data for evaluating different target tracking algorithms in most researches presented in the literature. Despite the convenience of simulation, ultimate evaluation of a tracking algorithm must be made in real sce...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE)
2016-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jatm.com.br/ojs/index.php/jatm/article/view/588 |
_version_ | 1818012335173795840 |
---|---|
author | Marcelo Lucena de Souza Alberto Gaspar Guimarães Ernesto Leite Pinto |
author_facet | Marcelo Lucena de Souza Alberto Gaspar Guimarães Ernesto Leite Pinto |
author_sort | Marcelo Lucena de Souza |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Performance indexes obtained in idealized simulated scenarios are the primary source of data for evaluating different target tracking algorithms in most researches presented in the literature. Despite the convenience of simulation, ultimate evaluation of a tracking algorithm must be made in real scenarios. Unfortunately, real radar measurements as well as accurate aircraft position, necessary for calculating tracking errors, are not easily available. In this paper, we present an evaluation of the well-known Interacting Multiple-Model with Probabilistic Data
Association Filtering algorithm using data obtained from a flight inspection of a Brazilian Air Force ground-based long-range surveillance radar. The presented results show that, in this scenario the Interacting Multiple-Model with Probabilistic Data Association Filtering algorithm performance using real data is worse compared to simulation. Statistical properties of the real radar measurements are also investigated, and some evidence is found that embedded noise is not well modeled as perfectly white. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-14T06:19:56Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8e151f5a2b5348e090e74e7d81a7f8ba |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1984-9648 2175-9146 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-14T06:19:56Z |
publishDate | 2016-04-01 |
publisher | Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE) |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management |
spelling | doaj.art-8e151f5a2b5348e090e74e7d81a7f8ba2022-12-22T02:08:05ZengInstituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE)Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management1984-96482175-91462016-04-018214315110.5028/jatm.v8i2.588Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar MeasurementsMarcelo Lucena de Souza0Alberto Gaspar Guimarães1Ernesto Leite Pinto2Força Aérea Brasileira – Departamento de Controle do Espaço Aéreo – Parque de Material de Eletrônica da AeronáuticaExército Brasileiro – Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia – Instituto Militar de EngenhariaExército Brasileiro – Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia – Instituto Militar de EngenhariaPerformance indexes obtained in idealized simulated scenarios are the primary source of data for evaluating different target tracking algorithms in most researches presented in the literature. Despite the convenience of simulation, ultimate evaluation of a tracking algorithm must be made in real scenarios. Unfortunately, real radar measurements as well as accurate aircraft position, necessary for calculating tracking errors, are not easily available. In this paper, we present an evaluation of the well-known Interacting Multiple-Model with Probabilistic Data Association Filtering algorithm using data obtained from a flight inspection of a Brazilian Air Force ground-based long-range surveillance radar. The presented results show that, in this scenario the Interacting Multiple-Model with Probabilistic Data Association Filtering algorithm performance using real data is worse compared to simulation. Statistical properties of the real radar measurements are also investigated, and some evidence is found that embedded noise is not well modeled as perfectly white.http://www.jatm.com.br/ojs/index.php/jatm/article/view/588Radar trackingState estimationData simulationRadar data |
spellingShingle | Marcelo Lucena de Souza Alberto Gaspar Guimarães Ernesto Leite Pinto Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar Measurements Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management Radar tracking State estimation Data simulation Radar data |
title | Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar Measurements |
title_full | Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar Measurements |
title_fullStr | Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar Measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar Measurements |
title_short | Performance Comparison of the IMMPDAF Algorithm Using Real and Simulated Radar Measurements |
title_sort | performance comparison of the immpdaf algorithm using real and simulated radar measurements |
topic | Radar tracking State estimation Data simulation Radar data |
url | http://www.jatm.com.br/ojs/index.php/jatm/article/view/588 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marcelolucenadesouza performancecomparisonoftheimmpdafalgorithmusingrealandsimulatedradarmeasurements AT albertogasparguimaraes performancecomparisonoftheimmpdafalgorithmusingrealandsimulatedradarmeasurements AT ernestoleitepinto performancecomparisonoftheimmpdafalgorithmusingrealandsimulatedradarmeasurements |