Comparison of four histological scoring systems for autoimmune hepatitis to improve diagnostic sensitivity

Background/Aims The histological criteria in the 1999 and 2008 scoring systems proposed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) have their inherent limitations in diagnosing autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). In this study, we evaluated the histology components of four scoring systems (1. r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soomin Ahn, Sook-Hyang Jeong, Eun Ju Cho, Kyoungbun Lee, Gilhyang Kim, Haeryoung Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Association for the Study of the Liver 2024-01-01
Series:Clinical and Molecular Hepatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://e-cmh.org/upload/pdf/cmh-2023-0325.pdf
_version_ 1797360116044922880
author Soomin Ahn
Sook-Hyang Jeong
Eun Ju Cho
Kyoungbun Lee
Gilhyang Kim
Haeryoung Kim
author_facet Soomin Ahn
Sook-Hyang Jeong
Eun Ju Cho
Kyoungbun Lee
Gilhyang Kim
Haeryoung Kim
author_sort Soomin Ahn
collection DOAJ
description Background/Aims The histological criteria in the 1999 and 2008 scoring systems proposed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) have their inherent limitations in diagnosing autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). In this study, we evaluated the histology components of four scoring systems (1. revised original scoring system [“1999 IAIHG”], 2. simplified scoring system [“2008 IAIHG”], 3. modified histologic criteria [“2017 UCSF”], and 4. a new histologic criteria proposed by the International AIH Pathology Group [“2022 IAHPG”]) in AIH patients. Methods Medical records and liver biopsies were retrospectively reviewed for 68 patients from two independent medical institutions, diagnosed with AIH based on the 1999 IAIHG system between 2006 and 2016. The histological features were reviewed in detail, and the four histological scoring systems were compared. Results Out of the 68 patients, 56 (82.4%) patients met the “probable” or “definite” AIH criteria of the 2008 IAIHG system, and the proportion of histologic score 2 (maximum) was 40/68 (58.8%). By applying the 2017 UCSF criteria, the number of histology score 2 increased to 60/68 (88.2%), and “probable” or “definite” AIH cases increased to 61/68 (89.7%). Finally, applying the 2022 IAHPG histology score resulted in the highest number of cases with histologic score 2 (64/68; 94.1%) and with a diagnosis of “probable” or “definite” AIH (62/68; 91.2%). Conclusions The recently proposed UCSF/IAHPG histological criteria increased the histology score of AIH. Substituting the histology component of the 2008 IAIHG system with the 2022 IAHPG criteria increased the sensitivity for diagnosing AIH (≥“Probable AIH”) from 82.4% to 91.2%.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T15:34:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8e25a4cb0cd34504aa4543ad0cc7ec30
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2287-2728
2287-285X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T15:34:43Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Korean Association for the Study of the Liver
record_format Article
series Clinical and Molecular Hepatology
spelling doaj.art-8e25a4cb0cd34504aa4543ad0cc7ec302024-01-10T01:29:36ZengKorean Association for the Study of the LiverClinical and Molecular Hepatology2287-27282287-285X2024-01-01301374810.3350/cmh.2023.03251864Comparison of four histological scoring systems for autoimmune hepatitis to improve diagnostic sensitivitySoomin Ahn0Sook-Hyang Jeong1Eun Ju Cho2Kyoungbun Lee3Gilhyang Kim4Haeryoung Kim5 Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaBackground/Aims The histological criteria in the 1999 and 2008 scoring systems proposed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) have their inherent limitations in diagnosing autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). In this study, we evaluated the histology components of four scoring systems (1. revised original scoring system [“1999 IAIHG”], 2. simplified scoring system [“2008 IAIHG”], 3. modified histologic criteria [“2017 UCSF”], and 4. a new histologic criteria proposed by the International AIH Pathology Group [“2022 IAHPG”]) in AIH patients. Methods Medical records and liver biopsies were retrospectively reviewed for 68 patients from two independent medical institutions, diagnosed with AIH based on the 1999 IAIHG system between 2006 and 2016. The histological features were reviewed in detail, and the four histological scoring systems were compared. Results Out of the 68 patients, 56 (82.4%) patients met the “probable” or “definite” AIH criteria of the 2008 IAIHG system, and the proportion of histologic score 2 (maximum) was 40/68 (58.8%). By applying the 2017 UCSF criteria, the number of histology score 2 increased to 60/68 (88.2%), and “probable” or “definite” AIH cases increased to 61/68 (89.7%). Finally, applying the 2022 IAHPG histology score resulted in the highest number of cases with histologic score 2 (64/68; 94.1%) and with a diagnosis of “probable” or “definite” AIH (62/68; 91.2%). Conclusions The recently proposed UCSF/IAHPG histological criteria increased the histology score of AIH. Substituting the histology component of the 2008 IAIHG system with the 2022 IAHPG criteria increased the sensitivity for diagnosing AIH (≥“Probable AIH”) from 82.4% to 91.2%.http://e-cmh.org/upload/pdf/cmh-2023-0325.pdfautoimmune hepatitishistologydiagnosis
spellingShingle Soomin Ahn
Sook-Hyang Jeong
Eun Ju Cho
Kyoungbun Lee
Gilhyang Kim
Haeryoung Kim
Comparison of four histological scoring systems for autoimmune hepatitis to improve diagnostic sensitivity
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology
autoimmune hepatitis
histology
diagnosis
title Comparison of four histological scoring systems for autoimmune hepatitis to improve diagnostic sensitivity
title_full Comparison of four histological scoring systems for autoimmune hepatitis to improve diagnostic sensitivity
title_fullStr Comparison of four histological scoring systems for autoimmune hepatitis to improve diagnostic sensitivity
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four histological scoring systems for autoimmune hepatitis to improve diagnostic sensitivity
title_short Comparison of four histological scoring systems for autoimmune hepatitis to improve diagnostic sensitivity
title_sort comparison of four histological scoring systems for autoimmune hepatitis to improve diagnostic sensitivity
topic autoimmune hepatitis
histology
diagnosis
url http://e-cmh.org/upload/pdf/cmh-2023-0325.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT soominahn comparisonoffourhistologicalscoringsystemsforautoimmunehepatitistoimprovediagnosticsensitivity
AT sookhyangjeong comparisonoffourhistologicalscoringsystemsforautoimmunehepatitistoimprovediagnosticsensitivity
AT eunjucho comparisonoffourhistologicalscoringsystemsforautoimmunehepatitistoimprovediagnosticsensitivity
AT kyoungbunlee comparisonoffourhistologicalscoringsystemsforautoimmunehepatitistoimprovediagnosticsensitivity
AT gilhyangkim comparisonoffourhistologicalscoringsystemsforautoimmunehepatitistoimprovediagnosticsensitivity
AT haeryoungkim comparisonoffourhistologicalscoringsystemsforautoimmunehepatitistoimprovediagnosticsensitivity