Responses pastures of Cynodon mixed with forage peanut in Southwestern of Paraná

The objective of this study was to evaluate the development, the botanical and structural components of Coastcross-1 and Tifton 85 pastures mixed with increasing inclusion of forage peanut (0, 25, 50, 75% occupancy area), submitted to cuts, from August 2011 (planting of pastures) to April 2013 (last...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Magnos Fernando Ziech, Clair Jorge Olivo, Ana Regina Dahlem Ziech, Gilmar Roberto Meinerz, Alberto Luiz Gagstetter, Jacson Rodrigo Cullmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Londrina 2016-12-01
Series:Semina: Ciências Agrárias
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/20063
_version_ 1819207374558199808
author Magnos Fernando Ziech
Clair Jorge Olivo
Ana Regina Dahlem Ziech
Gilmar Roberto Meinerz
Alberto Luiz Gagstetter
Jacson Rodrigo Cullmann
author_facet Magnos Fernando Ziech
Clair Jorge Olivo
Ana Regina Dahlem Ziech
Gilmar Roberto Meinerz
Alberto Luiz Gagstetter
Jacson Rodrigo Cullmann
author_sort Magnos Fernando Ziech
collection DOAJ
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the development, the botanical and structural components of Coastcross-1 and Tifton 85 pastures mixed with increasing inclusion of forage peanut (0, 25, 50, 75% occupancy area), submitted to cuts, from August 2011 (planting of pastures) to April 2013 (last period of cut), totaling two years of study. The experimental design was factorial (three factors) distributed in randomized blocks, the factors were cultivars (two), the opportunities area for planting of forage peanut (four) and seasons that showed cuts, with three replications. It was evaluated the forage mass, dry matter accumulation rate, leaf:stem ratio, dead material, other species and forage peanut mass. The percentages of different implanted area with forage peanut did not affect the production parameters of pasture and structural composition of cultivars. The use of 75% of the area planted with forage peanut promoted share of close to 30% of the total mass of legumes. The leaf:stem ratio was higher for cv. Tifton 85 in daily average temperatures milder, in this situation, both cultivars decreased the forage rate accumulation. The increasing percentage of implanted area with forage peanut increased participation of legumes, decreasing the presence of dead material in the pasture, in the second year of evaluation.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T05:22:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8e26e63d1c9b407eaa70ab0886ad8cc6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1676-546X
1679-0359
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T05:22:29Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Universidade Estadual de Londrina
record_format Article
series Semina: Ciências Agrárias
spelling doaj.art-8e26e63d1c9b407eaa70ab0886ad8cc62022-12-21T17:58:40ZengUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaSemina: Ciências Agrárias1676-546X1679-03592016-12-013764193420210.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n6p419314669Responses pastures of Cynodon mixed with forage peanut in Southwestern of ParanáMagnos Fernando Ziech0Clair Jorge Olivo1Ana Regina Dahlem Ziech2Gilmar Roberto Meinerz3Alberto Luiz Gagstetter4Jacson Rodrigo Cullmann5Universidade Tecnológica Federal do ParanáUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do ParanáUniversidade Federal Fronteira SulUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do ParanáUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do ParanáThe objective of this study was to evaluate the development, the botanical and structural components of Coastcross-1 and Tifton 85 pastures mixed with increasing inclusion of forage peanut (0, 25, 50, 75% occupancy area), submitted to cuts, from August 2011 (planting of pastures) to April 2013 (last period of cut), totaling two years of study. The experimental design was factorial (three factors) distributed in randomized blocks, the factors were cultivars (two), the opportunities area for planting of forage peanut (four) and seasons that showed cuts, with three replications. It was evaluated the forage mass, dry matter accumulation rate, leaf:stem ratio, dead material, other species and forage peanut mass. The percentages of different implanted area with forage peanut did not affect the production parameters of pasture and structural composition of cultivars. The use of 75% of the area planted with forage peanut promoted share of close to 30% of the total mass of legumes. The leaf:stem ratio was higher for cv. Tifton 85 in daily average temperatures milder, in this situation, both cultivars decreased the forage rate accumulation. The increasing percentage of implanted area with forage peanut increased participation of legumes, decreasing the presence of dead material in the pasture, in the second year of evaluation.http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/20063Arachis pintoiCoastcross-1Massa de ForragemTaxa de acúmulo de forragemTifton 85.
spellingShingle Magnos Fernando Ziech
Clair Jorge Olivo
Ana Regina Dahlem Ziech
Gilmar Roberto Meinerz
Alberto Luiz Gagstetter
Jacson Rodrigo Cullmann
Responses pastures of Cynodon mixed with forage peanut in Southwestern of Paraná
Semina: Ciências Agrárias
Arachis pintoi
Coastcross-1
Massa de Forragem
Taxa de acúmulo de forragem
Tifton 85.
title Responses pastures of Cynodon mixed with forage peanut in Southwestern of Paraná
title_full Responses pastures of Cynodon mixed with forage peanut in Southwestern of Paraná
title_fullStr Responses pastures of Cynodon mixed with forage peanut in Southwestern of Paraná
title_full_unstemmed Responses pastures of Cynodon mixed with forage peanut in Southwestern of Paraná
title_short Responses pastures of Cynodon mixed with forage peanut in Southwestern of Paraná
title_sort responses pastures of cynodon mixed with forage peanut in southwestern of parana
topic Arachis pintoi
Coastcross-1
Massa de Forragem
Taxa de acúmulo de forragem
Tifton 85.
url http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/20063
work_keys_str_mv AT magnosfernandoziech responsespasturesofcynodonmixedwithforagepeanutinsouthwesternofparana
AT clairjorgeolivo responsespasturesofcynodonmixedwithforagepeanutinsouthwesternofparana
AT anareginadahlemziech responsespasturesofcynodonmixedwithforagepeanutinsouthwesternofparana
AT gilmarrobertomeinerz responsespasturesofcynodonmixedwithforagepeanutinsouthwesternofparana
AT albertoluizgagstetter responsespasturesofcynodonmixedwithforagepeanutinsouthwesternofparana
AT jacsonrodrigocullmann responsespasturesofcynodonmixedwithforagepeanutinsouthwesternofparana