Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?

Werasak Sasanakul, Ampaiwan Chuansumrit, Nongnuch Sirachainan, Praguywan Kadegasem Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandCorrespondence: Ampaiwan Chuansumrit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sasanakul W, Chuansumrit A, Sirachainan N, Kadegasem P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2022-05-01
Series:The Application of Clinical Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/prominent-mutation-of-intron-22-inversion-in-sporadic-hemophilia-is-it-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-TACG
_version_ 1828340740104650752
author Sasanakul W
Chuansumrit A
Sirachainan N
Kadegasem P
author_facet Sasanakul W
Chuansumrit A
Sirachainan N
Kadegasem P
author_sort Sasanakul W
collection DOAJ
description Werasak Sasanakul, Ampaiwan Chuansumrit, Nongnuch Sirachainan, Praguywan Kadegasem Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandCorrespondence: Ampaiwan Chuansumrit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand, Tel +66 2 2011749, Fax +66 2 2011748, Email ampaiwan.jua@mahidol.ac.thBackground: Adequate replacement for patients with hemophilia is costly, especially in countries with limited resources.Objective: Factor VIII gene mutations among Thai patients with hemophilia A were analyzed for the most common mutation. The cost-effectiveness of finding one female without family history of hemophilia possessing the most common factor VIII mutation was compared with the cost of treating one patient with hemophilia.Methods: In all, 109 unrelated patients with hemophilia A, defined as sporadic cases (n=58) and hereditary cases (n=51), were enrolled for genotypic analysis.Results: Intron 22 inversion was prominently found in 34 sporadic (58.6%) and 27 hereditary (51.9%) cases. The screening for intron 22 inversion among females without family history of hemophilia at antenatal care has been optionally suggested. A female with a positive result will undergo further prenatal diagnosis of hemophilia in her male offspring. On the contrary, a female with a negative test result remains at risk to have a hemophiliac son caused by other factor VIII gene mutations not included in the screening but the risk is not as high as intron 22 inversion. Although the screening of factor VIII mutation among females without family history of hemophilia is against the current practice, it has been initiated due to the inadequate treatment provided to patients with hemophilia in countries with limited resources. The study calculated approximately one female with intron 22 inversion would exist among 17,064 females without family history of hemophilia. The cost of screening (194,870 USD) was much less than that of treating one patient with hemophilia from birth to 40 years of age by the current regimen (378,000 USD).Conclusion: Implementing antenatal screening of intron 22 inversion among females without family history of hemophilia is optionally suggested, especially in economically less-developed countries with inadequate treatment service for patients with hemophilia.Keywords: intron 22 inversion, sporadic, hemophilia, hemophilia A, antenatal screening, female, cost-effectiveness
first_indexed 2024-04-13T23:00:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8e366a4aca884ddaa2dc4c6dc253ee86
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-704X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T23:00:53Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series The Application of Clinical Genetics
spelling doaj.art-8e366a4aca884ddaa2dc4c6dc253ee862022-12-22T02:25:51ZengDove Medical PressThe Application of Clinical Genetics1178-704X2022-05-01Volume 15495475410Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?Sasanakul WChuansumrit ASirachainan NKadegasem PWerasak Sasanakul, Ampaiwan Chuansumrit, Nongnuch Sirachainan, Praguywan Kadegasem Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandCorrespondence: Ampaiwan Chuansumrit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand, Tel +66 2 2011749, Fax +66 2 2011748, Email ampaiwan.jua@mahidol.ac.thBackground: Adequate replacement for patients with hemophilia is costly, especially in countries with limited resources.Objective: Factor VIII gene mutations among Thai patients with hemophilia A were analyzed for the most common mutation. The cost-effectiveness of finding one female without family history of hemophilia possessing the most common factor VIII mutation was compared with the cost of treating one patient with hemophilia.Methods: In all, 109 unrelated patients with hemophilia A, defined as sporadic cases (n=58) and hereditary cases (n=51), were enrolled for genotypic analysis.Results: Intron 22 inversion was prominently found in 34 sporadic (58.6%) and 27 hereditary (51.9%) cases. The screening for intron 22 inversion among females without family history of hemophilia at antenatal care has been optionally suggested. A female with a positive result will undergo further prenatal diagnosis of hemophilia in her male offspring. On the contrary, a female with a negative test result remains at risk to have a hemophiliac son caused by other factor VIII gene mutations not included in the screening but the risk is not as high as intron 22 inversion. Although the screening of factor VIII mutation among females without family history of hemophilia is against the current practice, it has been initiated due to the inadequate treatment provided to patients with hemophilia in countries with limited resources. The study calculated approximately one female with intron 22 inversion would exist among 17,064 females without family history of hemophilia. The cost of screening (194,870 USD) was much less than that of treating one patient with hemophilia from birth to 40 years of age by the current regimen (378,000 USD).Conclusion: Implementing antenatal screening of intron 22 inversion among females without family history of hemophilia is optionally suggested, especially in economically less-developed countries with inadequate treatment service for patients with hemophilia.Keywords: intron 22 inversion, sporadic, hemophilia, hemophilia A, antenatal screening, female, cost-effectivenesshttps://www.dovepress.com/prominent-mutation-of-intron-22-inversion-in-sporadic-hemophilia-is-it-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-TACGintron 22 inversionsporadichemophiliahemophilia aantenatal screeningfemalecost-effectiveness
spellingShingle Sasanakul W
Chuansumrit A
Sirachainan N
Kadegasem P
Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?
The Application of Clinical Genetics
intron 22 inversion
sporadic
hemophilia
hemophilia a
antenatal screening
female
cost-effectiveness
title Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?
title_full Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?
title_fullStr Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?
title_full_unstemmed Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?
title_short Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?
title_sort prominent mutation of intron 22 inversion in sporadic hemophilia is it worth the antenatal screening
topic intron 22 inversion
sporadic
hemophilia
hemophilia a
antenatal screening
female
cost-effectiveness
url https://www.dovepress.com/prominent-mutation-of-intron-22-inversion-in-sporadic-hemophilia-is-it-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-TACG
work_keys_str_mv AT sasanakulw prominentmutationofintron22inversioninsporadichemophiliaisitworththeantenatalscreening
AT chuansumrita prominentmutationofintron22inversioninsporadichemophiliaisitworththeantenatalscreening
AT sirachainann prominentmutationofintron22inversioninsporadichemophiliaisitworththeantenatalscreening
AT kadegasemp prominentmutationofintron22inversioninsporadichemophiliaisitworththeantenatalscreening