Speech and Language Practitioners’ Experiences of Commercially Available Voice-Assisted Technology: Web-Based Survey Study
BackgroundSpeech and language therapy involves the identification, assessment, and treatment of children and adults who have difficulties with communication, eating, drinking, and swallowing. Globally, pressing needs outstrip the availability of qualified practitioners who, o...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies |
| Online Access: | https://rehab.jmir.org/2022/1/e29249 |
| _version_ | 1797735481220268032 |
|---|---|
| author | Pranav Kulkarni Orla Duffy Jonathan Synnott W George Kernohan Roisin McNaney |
| author_facet | Pranav Kulkarni Orla Duffy Jonathan Synnott W George Kernohan Roisin McNaney |
| author_sort | Pranav Kulkarni |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundSpeech and language therapy involves the identification, assessment, and treatment of children and adults who have difficulties with communication, eating, drinking, and swallowing. Globally, pressing needs outstrip the availability of qualified practitioners who, of necessity, focus on individuals with advanced needs. The potential of voice-assisted technology (VAT) to assist people with speech impairments is an emerging area of research but empirical work exploring its professional adoption is limited.
ObjectiveThis study aims to explore the professional experiences of speech and language therapists (SaLTs) using VAT with their clients to identify the potential applications and barriers to VAT adoption and thereby inform future directions of research.
MethodsA 23-question survey was distributed to the SaLTs from the United Kingdom using a web-based platform, eliciting both checkbox and free-text responses, to questions on perceptions and any use experiences of VAT. Data were analyzed descriptively with content analysis of free text, providing context to their specific experiences of using VAT in practice, including barriers and opportunities for future use.
ResultsA total of 230 UK-based professionals fully completed the survey; most were technologically competent and were aware of commercial VATs (such as Alexa and Google Assistant). However, only 49 (21.3%) SaLTs had used VAT with their clients and described 57 use cases. They reported using VAT with 10 different client groups, such as people with dysarthria and users of augmentative and alternative communication technologies. Of these, almost half (28/57, 49%) used the technology to assist their clients with day-to-day tasks, such as web browsing, setting up reminders, sending messages, and playing music. Many respondents (21/57, 37%) also reported using the technology to improve client speech, to facilitate speech practice at home, and to enhance articulation and volume. Most reported a positive impact of VAT use, stating improved independence (22/57, 39%), accessibility (6/57, 10%), and confidence (5/57, 8%). Some respondents reported increased client communication (5/57, 9%) and sociability (3/57, 5%). Reasons given for not using VAT in practice included lack of opportunity (131/181, 72.4%) and training (63/181, 34.8%). Most respondents (154/181, 85.1%) indicated that they would like to try VAT in the future, stating that it could have a positive impact on their clients’ speech, independence, and confidence.
ConclusionsVAT is used by some UK-based SaLTs to enable communication tasks at home with their clients. However, its wider adoption may be limited by a lack of professional opportunity. Looking forward, additional benefits are promised, as the data show a level of engagement, empowerment, and the possibility of achieving therapeutic outcomes in communication impairment. The disparate responses suggest that this area is ripe for the development of evidence-based clinical practice, starting with a clear definition, outcome measurement, and professional standardization. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:58:38Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8e3f94a96d3c4f02906e2d79185fce30 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2369-2529 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:58:38Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies |
| spelling | doaj.art-8e3f94a96d3c4f02906e2d79185fce302023-08-28T20:17:57ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies2369-25292022-01-0191e2924910.2196/29249Speech and Language Practitioners’ Experiences of Commercially Available Voice-Assisted Technology: Web-Based Survey StudyPranav Kulkarnihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5544-5515Orla Duffyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3729-7576Jonathan Synnotthttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6768-7877W George Kernohanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1309-446XRoisin McNaneyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3761-296X BackgroundSpeech and language therapy involves the identification, assessment, and treatment of children and adults who have difficulties with communication, eating, drinking, and swallowing. Globally, pressing needs outstrip the availability of qualified practitioners who, of necessity, focus on individuals with advanced needs. The potential of voice-assisted technology (VAT) to assist people with speech impairments is an emerging area of research but empirical work exploring its professional adoption is limited. ObjectiveThis study aims to explore the professional experiences of speech and language therapists (SaLTs) using VAT with their clients to identify the potential applications and barriers to VAT adoption and thereby inform future directions of research. MethodsA 23-question survey was distributed to the SaLTs from the United Kingdom using a web-based platform, eliciting both checkbox and free-text responses, to questions on perceptions and any use experiences of VAT. Data were analyzed descriptively with content analysis of free text, providing context to their specific experiences of using VAT in practice, including barriers and opportunities for future use. ResultsA total of 230 UK-based professionals fully completed the survey; most were technologically competent and were aware of commercial VATs (such as Alexa and Google Assistant). However, only 49 (21.3%) SaLTs had used VAT with their clients and described 57 use cases. They reported using VAT with 10 different client groups, such as people with dysarthria and users of augmentative and alternative communication technologies. Of these, almost half (28/57, 49%) used the technology to assist their clients with day-to-day tasks, such as web browsing, setting up reminders, sending messages, and playing music. Many respondents (21/57, 37%) also reported using the technology to improve client speech, to facilitate speech practice at home, and to enhance articulation and volume. Most reported a positive impact of VAT use, stating improved independence (22/57, 39%), accessibility (6/57, 10%), and confidence (5/57, 8%). Some respondents reported increased client communication (5/57, 9%) and sociability (3/57, 5%). Reasons given for not using VAT in practice included lack of opportunity (131/181, 72.4%) and training (63/181, 34.8%). Most respondents (154/181, 85.1%) indicated that they would like to try VAT in the future, stating that it could have a positive impact on their clients’ speech, independence, and confidence. ConclusionsVAT is used by some UK-based SaLTs to enable communication tasks at home with their clients. However, its wider adoption may be limited by a lack of professional opportunity. Looking forward, additional benefits are promised, as the data show a level of engagement, empowerment, and the possibility of achieving therapeutic outcomes in communication impairment. The disparate responses suggest that this area is ripe for the development of evidence-based clinical practice, starting with a clear definition, outcome measurement, and professional standardization.https://rehab.jmir.org/2022/1/e29249 |
| spellingShingle | Pranav Kulkarni Orla Duffy Jonathan Synnott W George Kernohan Roisin McNaney Speech and Language Practitioners’ Experiences of Commercially Available Voice-Assisted Technology: Web-Based Survey Study JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies |
| title | Speech and Language Practitioners’ Experiences of Commercially Available Voice-Assisted Technology: Web-Based Survey Study |
| title_full | Speech and Language Practitioners’ Experiences of Commercially Available Voice-Assisted Technology: Web-Based Survey Study |
| title_fullStr | Speech and Language Practitioners’ Experiences of Commercially Available Voice-Assisted Technology: Web-Based Survey Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Speech and Language Practitioners’ Experiences of Commercially Available Voice-Assisted Technology: Web-Based Survey Study |
| title_short | Speech and Language Practitioners’ Experiences of Commercially Available Voice-Assisted Technology: Web-Based Survey Study |
| title_sort | speech and language practitioners experiences of commercially available voice assisted technology web based survey study |
| url | https://rehab.jmir.org/2022/1/e29249 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pranavkulkarni speechandlanguagepractitionersexperiencesofcommerciallyavailablevoiceassistedtechnologywebbasedsurveystudy AT orladuffy speechandlanguagepractitionersexperiencesofcommerciallyavailablevoiceassistedtechnologywebbasedsurveystudy AT jonathansynnott speechandlanguagepractitionersexperiencesofcommerciallyavailablevoiceassistedtechnologywebbasedsurveystudy AT wgeorgekernohan speechandlanguagepractitionersexperiencesofcommerciallyavailablevoiceassistedtechnologywebbasedsurveystudy AT roisinmcnaney speechandlanguagepractitionersexperiencesofcommerciallyavailablevoiceassistedtechnologywebbasedsurveystudy |