Messaging inclusion with consequence: U.S. sanctuary cities and immigrant wellbeing

In the United States (U.S.), sanctuary cities have increasingly garnered public attention as places dedicated to increasing immigrant safety, inclusion, and health. These cities primarily rely on limiting local police cooperation with federal immigration enforcement to deter immigrant detention and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashley R. Houston, Carmel Salhi, Alisa K. Lincoln
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Migration and Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623523000491
_version_ 1797454573661585408
author Ashley R. Houston
Carmel Salhi
Alisa K. Lincoln
author_facet Ashley R. Houston
Carmel Salhi
Alisa K. Lincoln
author_sort Ashley R. Houston
collection DOAJ
description In the United States (U.S.), sanctuary cities have increasingly garnered public attention as places dedicated to increasing immigrant safety, inclusion, and health. These cities primarily rely on limiting local police cooperation with federal immigration enforcement to deter immigrant detention and deportation. However, sanctuary policies’ inability to extend immigrants’ legal rights and their reliance on police as ushers of sanctuary may complicate how these spaces attend to their stated goals. In this paper, we examine how organizational workers conceptualize sanctuary, safety, and immigrant health and wellbeing within sanctuary cities. We draw on interviews with organizational workers in two sanctuary cities: Boston, Massachusetts and Seattle, Washington collected between February and August 2018. Our findings reveal that immigrants continue to face structural barriers to housing, safe employment, education, and healthcare within sanctuary cities with consequences to wellbeing. Workers’ definitions of safety draw on interconnected structural exclusion that prevent immigrants from accessing basic needs and fail to account for historically rooted forms of racism and nativism. Organizational workers identified tensions between messages of sanctuary and what local sanctuary policies offer in practice, providing insight into consequences of institutionalizing a grassroots social movement. As organizational workers negotiate these tensions, they must develop everyday sanctuary practices to extend immigrant inclusion, safety, health, and wellbeing.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:39:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8e53a8f4c04841f29469a2e752601219
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-6235
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:39:06Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Migration and Health
spelling doaj.art-8e53a8f4c04841f29469a2e7526012192023-11-25T04:50:24ZengElsevierJournal of Migration and Health2666-62352023-01-018100199Messaging inclusion with consequence: U.S. sanctuary cities and immigrant wellbeingAshley R. Houston0Carmel Salhi1Alisa K. Lincoln2Institute for Health Equity and Social Justice Research, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United States; Department of Counseling, Developmental, and Educational Psychology, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, United States; Corresponding author.Institute for Health Equity and Social Justice Research, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United States; Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United StatesInstitute for Health Equity and Social Justice Research, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United States; Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United States; Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Northeastern University,1135 Tremont St, Boston, MA 02120, United StatesIn the United States (U.S.), sanctuary cities have increasingly garnered public attention as places dedicated to increasing immigrant safety, inclusion, and health. These cities primarily rely on limiting local police cooperation with federal immigration enforcement to deter immigrant detention and deportation. However, sanctuary policies’ inability to extend immigrants’ legal rights and their reliance on police as ushers of sanctuary may complicate how these spaces attend to their stated goals. In this paper, we examine how organizational workers conceptualize sanctuary, safety, and immigrant health and wellbeing within sanctuary cities. We draw on interviews with organizational workers in two sanctuary cities: Boston, Massachusetts and Seattle, Washington collected between February and August 2018. Our findings reveal that immigrants continue to face structural barriers to housing, safe employment, education, and healthcare within sanctuary cities with consequences to wellbeing. Workers’ definitions of safety draw on interconnected structural exclusion that prevent immigrants from accessing basic needs and fail to account for historically rooted forms of racism and nativism. Organizational workers identified tensions between messages of sanctuary and what local sanctuary policies offer in practice, providing insight into consequences of institutionalizing a grassroots social movement. As organizational workers negotiate these tensions, they must develop everyday sanctuary practices to extend immigrant inclusion, safety, health, and wellbeing.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623523000491Sanctuary citiesImmigrationHealthSafetyStructural violenceSocial movements
spellingShingle Ashley R. Houston
Carmel Salhi
Alisa K. Lincoln
Messaging inclusion with consequence: U.S. sanctuary cities and immigrant wellbeing
Journal of Migration and Health
Sanctuary cities
Immigration
Health
Safety
Structural violence
Social movements
title Messaging inclusion with consequence: U.S. sanctuary cities and immigrant wellbeing
title_full Messaging inclusion with consequence: U.S. sanctuary cities and immigrant wellbeing
title_fullStr Messaging inclusion with consequence: U.S. sanctuary cities and immigrant wellbeing
title_full_unstemmed Messaging inclusion with consequence: U.S. sanctuary cities and immigrant wellbeing
title_short Messaging inclusion with consequence: U.S. sanctuary cities and immigrant wellbeing
title_sort messaging inclusion with consequence u s sanctuary cities and immigrant wellbeing
topic Sanctuary cities
Immigration
Health
Safety
Structural violence
Social movements
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623523000491
work_keys_str_mv AT ashleyrhouston messaginginclusionwithconsequenceussanctuarycitiesandimmigrantwellbeing
AT carmelsalhi messaginginclusionwithconsequenceussanctuarycitiesandimmigrantwellbeing
AT alisaklincoln messaginginclusionwithconsequenceussanctuarycitiesandimmigrantwellbeing