Formalism versus Purposivism in Islamic Jurisprudence: The Case of Islamic Finance Law

This manuscript critically discusses the current implications of the scriptural injunctions against <i>gharar</i> and <i>maysir</i>. It elaborates how overlooking the features of the contemporary world and adopting a formalistic approach in Islamic jurisprudence have led to a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pejman Abedifar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/4/465
_version_ 1797603657335701504
author Pejman Abedifar
author_facet Pejman Abedifar
author_sort Pejman Abedifar
collection DOAJ
description This manuscript critically discusses the current implications of the scriptural injunctions against <i>gharar</i> and <i>maysir</i>. It elaborates how overlooking the features of the contemporary world and adopting a formalistic approach in Islamic jurisprudence have led to absurdity in the implication of the doctrines of <i>gharar</i> and <i>maysir</i> for Muslims’ financial activities. The manuscript also underscores the necessity of adopting the <i>maqāsid</i> approach (purposivism) in Islamic jurisprudence. It propounds that the cogent concern of the injunctions could have been an initiative for Islamic scholars to establish an advanced contract law and to promote transparency in economic activities if a <i>maqāsid</i> approach had been adopted in Islamic jurisprudence.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T04:35:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8e58b4cb72d94ffabf5d2125b0c3ad16
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1444
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T04:35:06Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj.art-8e58b4cb72d94ffabf5d2125b0c3ad162023-11-17T21:08:38ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442023-04-0114446510.3390/rel14040465Formalism versus Purposivism in Islamic Jurisprudence: The Case of Islamic Finance LawPejman Abedifar0Centre for Responsible Banking & Finance, School of Management, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9RJ, UKThis manuscript critically discusses the current implications of the scriptural injunctions against <i>gharar</i> and <i>maysir</i>. It elaborates how overlooking the features of the contemporary world and adopting a formalistic approach in Islamic jurisprudence have led to absurdity in the implication of the doctrines of <i>gharar</i> and <i>maysir</i> for Muslims’ financial activities. The manuscript also underscores the necessity of adopting the <i>maqāsid</i> approach (purposivism) in Islamic jurisprudence. It propounds that the cogent concern of the injunctions could have been an initiative for Islamic scholars to establish an advanced contract law and to promote transparency in economic activities if a <i>maqāsid</i> approach had been adopted in Islamic jurisprudence.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/4/465Islamic finance lawmaqāsid al-sharī’ahpurposivismghararmaysir
spellingShingle Pejman Abedifar
Formalism versus Purposivism in Islamic Jurisprudence: The Case of Islamic Finance Law
Religions
Islamic finance law
maqāsid al-sharī’ah
purposivism
gharar
maysir
title Formalism versus Purposivism in Islamic Jurisprudence: The Case of Islamic Finance Law
title_full Formalism versus Purposivism in Islamic Jurisprudence: The Case of Islamic Finance Law
title_fullStr Formalism versus Purposivism in Islamic Jurisprudence: The Case of Islamic Finance Law
title_full_unstemmed Formalism versus Purposivism in Islamic Jurisprudence: The Case of Islamic Finance Law
title_short Formalism versus Purposivism in Islamic Jurisprudence: The Case of Islamic Finance Law
title_sort formalism versus purposivism in islamic jurisprudence the case of islamic finance law
topic Islamic finance law
maqāsid al-sharī’ah
purposivism
gharar
maysir
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/4/465
work_keys_str_mv AT pejmanabedifar formalismversuspurposivisminislamicjurisprudencethecaseofislamicfinancelaw