Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring
Process and tool condition monitoring systems are a prerequisite for autonomous production. One approach to monitoring individual parts without complex cutting simulations is the transfer of knowledge among similar monitoring scenarios. This paper introduces a novel monitoring method which transfers...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-11-01
|
| Series: | Machines |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/9/11/282 |
| _version_ | 1797509615481520128 |
|---|---|
| author | Berend Denkena Benjamin Bergmann Tobias H. Stiehl |
| author_facet | Berend Denkena Benjamin Bergmann Tobias H. Stiehl |
| author_sort | Berend Denkena |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Process and tool condition monitoring systems are a prerequisite for autonomous production. One approach to monitoring individual parts without complex cutting simulations is the transfer of knowledge among similar monitoring scenarios. This paper introduces a novel monitoring method which transfers monitoring limits for process signals between different machine tools. The method calculates monitoring limits statistically from cutting processes carried out on one or more similar machines. The monitoring algorithm aims to detect general process anomalies online. Experiments comprise face-turning operations at five different lathes, four of which were of the same model. Results include the successful transfer of monitoring limits between machines of the same model for the detection of material anomalies. In comparison to an approach based on dynamic time warping (DTW) and density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), the new method showed fewer false alarms and higher detection rates. However, for the transfer between different models of machines, the successful application of the new method is limited. This is predominantly due to limitations of the employed process component isolation and differences between machine models in terms of signal properties as well as execution speed. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T05:20:52Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8e5becade4af4eea846c016eb8b96721 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2075-1702 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T05:20:52Z |
| publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Machines |
| spelling | doaj.art-8e5becade4af4eea846c016eb8b967212023-11-23T00:06:20ZengMDPI AGMachines2075-17022021-11-0191128210.3390/machines9110282Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition MonitoringBerend Denkena0Benjamin Bergmann1Tobias H. Stiehl2Institute of Production Engineering and Machine Tools, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30823 Garbsen, GermanyInstitute of Production Engineering and Machine Tools, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30823 Garbsen, GermanyInstitute of Production Engineering and Machine Tools, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30823 Garbsen, GermanyProcess and tool condition monitoring systems are a prerequisite for autonomous production. One approach to monitoring individual parts without complex cutting simulations is the transfer of knowledge among similar monitoring scenarios. This paper introduces a novel monitoring method which transfers monitoring limits for process signals between different machine tools. The method calculates monitoring limits statistically from cutting processes carried out on one or more similar machines. The monitoring algorithm aims to detect general process anomalies online. Experiments comprise face-turning operations at five different lathes, four of which were of the same model. Results include the successful transfer of monitoring limits between machines of the same model for the detection of material anomalies. In comparison to an approach based on dynamic time warping (DTW) and density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), the new method showed fewer false alarms and higher detection rates. However, for the transfer between different models of machines, the successful application of the new method is limited. This is predominantly due to limitations of the employed process component isolation and differences between machine models in terms of signal properties as well as execution speed.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/9/11/282machine toolsturningprocess monitoringknowledge transfer |
| spellingShingle | Berend Denkena Benjamin Bergmann Tobias H. Stiehl Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring Machines machine tools turning process monitoring knowledge transfer |
| title | Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring |
| title_full | Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring |
| title_fullStr | Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring |
| title_full_unstemmed | Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring |
| title_short | Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring |
| title_sort | transfer of process references between machine tools for online tool condition monitoring |
| topic | machine tools turning process monitoring knowledge transfer |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/9/11/282 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT berenddenkena transferofprocessreferencesbetweenmachinetoolsforonlinetoolconditionmonitoring AT benjaminbergmann transferofprocessreferencesbetweenmachinetoolsforonlinetoolconditionmonitoring AT tobiashstiehl transferofprocessreferencesbetweenmachinetoolsforonlinetoolconditionmonitoring |