A Hypothesis for Theta Rhythm Frequency Control in CA1 Microcircuits

Computational models of neural circuits with varying levels of biophysical detail have been generated in pursuit of an underlying mechanism explaining the ubiquitous hippocampal theta rhythm. However, within the theta rhythm are at least two types with distinct frequencies associated with different...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frances K. Skinner, Scott Rich, Anton R. Lunyov, Jeremie Lefebvre, Alexandra P. Chatzikalymniou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Neural Circuits
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncir.2021.643360/full
_version_ 1818451723014897664
author Frances K. Skinner
Frances K. Skinner
Frances K. Skinner
Scott Rich
Anton R. Lunyov
Jeremie Lefebvre
Alexandra P. Chatzikalymniou
Alexandra P. Chatzikalymniou
author_facet Frances K. Skinner
Frances K. Skinner
Frances K. Skinner
Scott Rich
Anton R. Lunyov
Jeremie Lefebvre
Alexandra P. Chatzikalymniou
Alexandra P. Chatzikalymniou
author_sort Frances K. Skinner
collection DOAJ
description Computational models of neural circuits with varying levels of biophysical detail have been generated in pursuit of an underlying mechanism explaining the ubiquitous hippocampal theta rhythm. However, within the theta rhythm are at least two types with distinct frequencies associated with different behavioral states, an aspect that must be considered in pursuit of these mechanistic explanations. Here, using our previously developed excitatory-inhibitory network models that generate theta rhythms, we investigate the robustness of theta generation to intrinsic neuronal variability by building a database of heterogeneous excitatory cells and implementing them in our microcircuit model. We specifically investigate the impact of three key “building block” features of the excitatory cell model that underlie our model design: these cells' rheobase, their capacity for post-inhibitory rebound, and their spike-frequency adaptation. We show that theta rhythms at various frequencies can arise dependent upon the combination of these building block features, and we find that the speed of these oscillations are dependent upon the excitatory cells' response to inhibitory drive, as encapsulated by their phase response curves. Taken together, these findings support a hypothesis for theta frequency control that includes two aspects: (i) an internal mechanism that stems from the building block features of excitatory cell dynamics; (ii) an external mechanism that we describe as “inhibition-based tuning” of excitatory cell firing. We propose that these mechanisms control theta rhythm frequencies and underlie their robustness.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T21:11:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8e5ee882ffa74d53b2e4a984b0d31488
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5110
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T21:11:43Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neural Circuits
spelling doaj.art-8e5ee882ffa74d53b2e4a984b0d314882022-12-21T22:47:13ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neural Circuits1662-51102021-04-011510.3389/fncir.2021.643360643360A Hypothesis for Theta Rhythm Frequency Control in CA1 MicrocircuitsFrances K. Skinner0Frances K. Skinner1Frances K. Skinner2Scott Rich3Anton R. Lunyov4Jeremie Lefebvre5Alexandra P. Chatzikalymniou6Alexandra P. Chatzikalymniou7Division of Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Brain Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaDivision of Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Brain Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, CanadaDivision of Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Brain Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, CanadaDivision of Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Brain Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, CanadaDivision of Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Brain Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaComputational models of neural circuits with varying levels of biophysical detail have been generated in pursuit of an underlying mechanism explaining the ubiquitous hippocampal theta rhythm. However, within the theta rhythm are at least two types with distinct frequencies associated with different behavioral states, an aspect that must be considered in pursuit of these mechanistic explanations. Here, using our previously developed excitatory-inhibitory network models that generate theta rhythms, we investigate the robustness of theta generation to intrinsic neuronal variability by building a database of heterogeneous excitatory cells and implementing them in our microcircuit model. We specifically investigate the impact of three key “building block” features of the excitatory cell model that underlie our model design: these cells' rheobase, their capacity for post-inhibitory rebound, and their spike-frequency adaptation. We show that theta rhythms at various frequencies can arise dependent upon the combination of these building block features, and we find that the speed of these oscillations are dependent upon the excitatory cells' response to inhibitory drive, as encapsulated by their phase response curves. Taken together, these findings support a hypothesis for theta frequency control that includes two aspects: (i) an internal mechanism that stems from the building block features of excitatory cell dynamics; (ii) an external mechanism that we describe as “inhibition-based tuning” of excitatory cell firing. We propose that these mechanisms control theta rhythm frequencies and underlie their robustness.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncir.2021.643360/fulltheta rhythmtheta oscillationhippocampusinhibitionnetworkmicrocircuit
spellingShingle Frances K. Skinner
Frances K. Skinner
Frances K. Skinner
Scott Rich
Anton R. Lunyov
Jeremie Lefebvre
Alexandra P. Chatzikalymniou
Alexandra P. Chatzikalymniou
A Hypothesis for Theta Rhythm Frequency Control in CA1 Microcircuits
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
theta rhythm
theta oscillation
hippocampus
inhibition
network
microcircuit
title A Hypothesis for Theta Rhythm Frequency Control in CA1 Microcircuits
title_full A Hypothesis for Theta Rhythm Frequency Control in CA1 Microcircuits
title_fullStr A Hypothesis for Theta Rhythm Frequency Control in CA1 Microcircuits
title_full_unstemmed A Hypothesis for Theta Rhythm Frequency Control in CA1 Microcircuits
title_short A Hypothesis for Theta Rhythm Frequency Control in CA1 Microcircuits
title_sort hypothesis for theta rhythm frequency control in ca1 microcircuits
topic theta rhythm
theta oscillation
hippocampus
inhibition
network
microcircuit
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncir.2021.643360/full
work_keys_str_mv AT franceskskinner ahypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT franceskskinner ahypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT franceskskinner ahypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT scottrich ahypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT antonrlunyov ahypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT jeremielefebvre ahypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT alexandrapchatzikalymniou ahypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT alexandrapchatzikalymniou ahypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT franceskskinner hypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT franceskskinner hypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT franceskskinner hypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT scottrich hypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT antonrlunyov hypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT jeremielefebvre hypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT alexandrapchatzikalymniou hypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits
AT alexandrapchatzikalymniou hypothesisforthetarhythmfrequencycontrolinca1microcircuits