Comparison of Serum Spec fPL™ and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology

Background Feline pancreas‐specific lipase (Spec fPL) is considered a useful test for the antemortem diagnosis of pancreatitis in cats. A recent study found good agreement between the results of the Spec fPL and catalytic 1,2‐o‐dilauryl‐rac‐glycero‐3‐glutaric acid‐(6′‐methylresorufin) ester (DGGR) l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Oppliger, M. Hilbe, S. Hartnack, E. Zini, C.E. Reusch, P.H. Kook
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-05-01
Series:Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13924
_version_ 1811251419349516288
author S. Oppliger
M. Hilbe
S. Hartnack
E. Zini
C.E. Reusch
P.H. Kook
author_facet S. Oppliger
M. Hilbe
S. Hartnack
E. Zini
C.E. Reusch
P.H. Kook
author_sort S. Oppliger
collection DOAJ
description Background Feline pancreas‐specific lipase (Spec fPL) is considered a useful test for the antemortem diagnosis of pancreatitis in cats. A recent study found good agreement between the results of the Spec fPL and catalytic 1,2‐o‐dilauryl‐rac‐glycero‐3‐glutaric acid‐(6′‐methylresorufin) ester (DGGR) lipase assay. Prospective studies evaluating their sensitivity and specificity are lacking. Objectives To compare the results of the Spec fPL and the DGGR assays with a standardized histologic assessment of the pancreas. Animals Sixty client‐owned cats presented for necropsy. Methods Prospective study: Spec fPL concentrations and serum DGGR lipase activity were measured from the same blood sample. The pancreas was removed within 3 hours after euthanasia; serial transverse sections were made every 0.5 cm throughout the entire pancreas and reviewed using a histologic grading scheme. Sensitivity and specificity for the Spec fPL and DGGR assay results were determined. Results The sensitivity and specificity for the Spec fPL assay (cutoff value ≥5.4 μg/L) was 42.1 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 29.4–55.9%] and 100% (95% CI, 31.0–100.0%). The sensitivity and specificity for the DGGR assay (cutoff value >26 U/L) was 36.8 (95% CI, 24.7–50.7%) and 100% (95% CI, 31.0–100.0%). When lymphocytic inflammation up to 10% of a section was considered normal, the sensitivity and specificity for Spec fPL assay (cutoff value ≥5.4 μg/L) was 61.1 (95% CI, 36.1–81.7%) and 69.0% (95% CI, 52.8–81.9%) and the sensitivity and specificity for the DGGR assay (cutoff value >26 U/L) was 66.7 (95% CI, 41.2–85.6%) and 78.6% (95% CI, 62.8–89.2%). Conclusions and Clinical Importance Both lipase assays performed similarly well, but their agreement with histologic pancreatic inflammation was limited.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T16:19:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8e5fcaedad024df08b073896879e2fc9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0891-6640
1939-1676
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T16:19:17Z
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
spelling doaj.art-8e5fcaedad024df08b073896879e2fc92022-12-22T03:25:37ZengWileyJournal of Veterinary Internal Medicine0891-66401939-16762016-05-0130376477010.1111/jvim.13924Comparison of Serum Spec fPL™ and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic HistologyS. Oppliger0M. Hilbe1S. Hartnack2E. Zini3C.E. Reusch4P.H. Kook5Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich Zurich SwitzerlandInstitute for Veterinary Pathology Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich Zurich SwitzerlandSection of Epidemiology Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich Zurich SwitzerlandClinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich Zurich SwitzerlandClinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich Zurich SwitzerlandClinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich Zurich SwitzerlandBackground Feline pancreas‐specific lipase (Spec fPL) is considered a useful test for the antemortem diagnosis of pancreatitis in cats. A recent study found good agreement between the results of the Spec fPL and catalytic 1,2‐o‐dilauryl‐rac‐glycero‐3‐glutaric acid‐(6′‐methylresorufin) ester (DGGR) lipase assay. Prospective studies evaluating their sensitivity and specificity are lacking. Objectives To compare the results of the Spec fPL and the DGGR assays with a standardized histologic assessment of the pancreas. Animals Sixty client‐owned cats presented for necropsy. Methods Prospective study: Spec fPL concentrations and serum DGGR lipase activity were measured from the same blood sample. The pancreas was removed within 3 hours after euthanasia; serial transverse sections were made every 0.5 cm throughout the entire pancreas and reviewed using a histologic grading scheme. Sensitivity and specificity for the Spec fPL and DGGR assay results were determined. Results The sensitivity and specificity for the Spec fPL assay (cutoff value ≥5.4 μg/L) was 42.1 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 29.4–55.9%] and 100% (95% CI, 31.0–100.0%). The sensitivity and specificity for the DGGR assay (cutoff value >26 U/L) was 36.8 (95% CI, 24.7–50.7%) and 100% (95% CI, 31.0–100.0%). When lymphocytic inflammation up to 10% of a section was considered normal, the sensitivity and specificity for Spec fPL assay (cutoff value ≥5.4 μg/L) was 61.1 (95% CI, 36.1–81.7%) and 69.0% (95% CI, 52.8–81.9%) and the sensitivity and specificity for the DGGR assay (cutoff value >26 U/L) was 66.7 (95% CI, 41.2–85.6%) and 78.6% (95% CI, 62.8–89.2%). Conclusions and Clinical Importance Both lipase assays performed similarly well, but their agreement with histologic pancreatic inflammation was limited.https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13924FelineFeline pancreas‐specific lipaseHistopathologyLipasePancreas
spellingShingle S. Oppliger
M. Hilbe
S. Hartnack
E. Zini
C.E. Reusch
P.H. Kook
Comparison of Serum Spec fPL™ and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Feline
Feline pancreas‐specific lipase
Histopathology
Lipase
Pancreas
title Comparison of Serum Spec fPL™ and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology
title_full Comparison of Serum Spec fPL™ and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology
title_fullStr Comparison of Serum Spec fPL™ and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Serum Spec fPL™ and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology
title_short Comparison of Serum Spec fPL™ and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology
title_sort comparison of serum spec fpl™ and 1 2 o dilauryl rac glycero 3 glutaric acid 6 methylresorufin ester assay in 60 cats using standardized assessment of pancreatic histology
topic Feline
Feline pancreas‐specific lipase
Histopathology
Lipase
Pancreas
url https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13924
work_keys_str_mv AT soppliger comparisonofserumspecfpland12odilaurylracglycero3glutaricacid6methylresorufinesterassayin60catsusingstandardizedassessmentofpancreatichistology
AT mhilbe comparisonofserumspecfpland12odilaurylracglycero3glutaricacid6methylresorufinesterassayin60catsusingstandardizedassessmentofpancreatichistology
AT shartnack comparisonofserumspecfpland12odilaurylracglycero3glutaricacid6methylresorufinesterassayin60catsusingstandardizedassessmentofpancreatichistology
AT ezini comparisonofserumspecfpland12odilaurylracglycero3glutaricacid6methylresorufinesterassayin60catsusingstandardizedassessmentofpancreatichistology
AT cereusch comparisonofserumspecfpland12odilaurylracglycero3glutaricacid6methylresorufinesterassayin60catsusingstandardizedassessmentofpancreatichistology
AT phkook comparisonofserumspecfpland12odilaurylracglycero3glutaricacid6methylresorufinesterassayin60catsusingstandardizedassessmentofpancreatichistology