Communicating health risks in science publications: time for everyone to take responsibility
Abstract Research that is poorly communicated or presented is as potentially damaging as research that is poorly conducted or fraudulent. Recent examples illustrate how the problem often lies with researchers, not press officers or journalists. The quest for publication and ‘impact’ must not outweig...
Main Authors: | Alexandra L. J. Freeman, David J. Spiegelhalter |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-11-01
|
Series: | BMC Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-018-1194-4 |
Similar Items
-
Communicating clinical trial outcomes: Effects of presentation method on physicians’ evaluations of new treatments
by: Francesco Marcatto, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Clinical recommendations made in dermatology publications are frequently not supported by adequate evidence
by: Kathleen M. Coerdt, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01) -
Communicating clinical trial outcomes: Effects of presentation method on physicians' evaluations of new treatments
by: Francesco Marcatto, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Communicating personalized risks from COVID-19: guidelines from an empirical study
by: Alexandra L. J. Freeman, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Communicating with the public about major accident harzards /
by: European Conference on Communicating with the Public about Major Accident Hazards (1989 : Varese, Italy), et al.
Published: (1990)