Experimental Investigation of the Production of Sustainable Lightweight Concrete

An experimental study on four types of coarse aggregate was conducted to produce lightweight concrete. These four types are namely; white limestone, red limestone, clay brick fragments, and pumice. Ordinary Portland cement was used for all examined mixes. Water to cement ratio (w/c) was modified acc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mouhammed J. Lafta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Unviversity of Technology- Iraq 2020-11-01
Series:Engineering and Technology Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etj.uotechnology.edu.iq/article_169228_28fa196a0687d9e3e7d548d4c4804140.pdf
_version_ 1797336381292281856
author Mouhammed J. Lafta
author_facet Mouhammed J. Lafta
author_sort Mouhammed J. Lafta
collection DOAJ
description An experimental study on four types of coarse aggregate was conducted to produce lightweight concrete. These four types are namely; white limestone, red limestone, clay brick fragments, and pumice. Ordinary Portland cement was used for all examined mixes. Water to cement ratio (w/c) was modified according to the effect of coarse aggregate type on the workability of the resulted concrete for each mix. The reference concrete mix, which is normal concrete, water to cement ratio used was (0.5). The investigated characteristics for all concrete mixes were workability, compressive strength, dry density, absorption, and thermal conductivity. Results indicated that the aggregate type significantly affects most of the properties of lightweight concrete mixes such as workability, density, and thermal insulation for all tested types of concrete. All investigated specimens indicated improvement in terms of density, workability, and thermal conductivity when compared to the reference concrete mix. Yet, it was derived from the testing results that using pumice in lightweight concrete production is the optimum option among the other examined types. When compared to normal concrete, this type of lightweight concrete showed a 41% decrease in dry density, nearly 72.54% decrease in thermal conductivity, and about 12% increase in workability. However, it is vital to notice that due to the low compressive strength and the relatively high absorption capability for all the examined types of lightweight concrete, it is suggested to use these types of concrete for non-structural walls that are not subjected to or exposed to high humidity.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T08:53:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8e992f1d75204bfc9c6f31d63b41cc2c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1681-6900
2412-0758
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T08:53:31Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher Unviversity of Technology- Iraq
record_format Article
series Engineering and Technology Journal
spelling doaj.art-8e992f1d75204bfc9c6f31d63b41cc2c2024-02-01T07:36:19ZengUnviversity of Technology- IraqEngineering and Technology Journal1681-69002412-07582020-11-013811A1652166510.30684/etj.v38i11A.1621169228Experimental Investigation of the Production of Sustainable Lightweight ConcreteMouhammed J. Lafta0Engineering and Technology Journal,University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.An experimental study on four types of coarse aggregate was conducted to produce lightweight concrete. These four types are namely; white limestone, red limestone, clay brick fragments, and pumice. Ordinary Portland cement was used for all examined mixes. Water to cement ratio (w/c) was modified according to the effect of coarse aggregate type on the workability of the resulted concrete for each mix. The reference concrete mix, which is normal concrete, water to cement ratio used was (0.5). The investigated characteristics for all concrete mixes were workability, compressive strength, dry density, absorption, and thermal conductivity. Results indicated that the aggregate type significantly affects most of the properties of lightweight concrete mixes such as workability, density, and thermal insulation for all tested types of concrete. All investigated specimens indicated improvement in terms of density, workability, and thermal conductivity when compared to the reference concrete mix. Yet, it was derived from the testing results that using pumice in lightweight concrete production is the optimum option among the other examined types. When compared to normal concrete, this type of lightweight concrete showed a 41% decrease in dry density, nearly 72.54% decrease in thermal conductivity, and about 12% increase in workability. However, it is vital to notice that due to the low compressive strength and the relatively high absorption capability for all the examined types of lightweight concrete, it is suggested to use these types of concrete for non-structural walls that are not subjected to or exposed to high humidity.https://etj.uotechnology.edu.iq/article_169228_28fa196a0687d9e3e7d548d4c4804140.pdfcoarse aggregatelightweight concretenon-structural concretepumice
spellingShingle Mouhammed J. Lafta
Experimental Investigation of the Production of Sustainable Lightweight Concrete
Engineering and Technology Journal
coarse aggregate
lightweight concrete
non-structural concrete
pumice
title Experimental Investigation of the Production of Sustainable Lightweight Concrete
title_full Experimental Investigation of the Production of Sustainable Lightweight Concrete
title_fullStr Experimental Investigation of the Production of Sustainable Lightweight Concrete
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Investigation of the Production of Sustainable Lightweight Concrete
title_short Experimental Investigation of the Production of Sustainable Lightweight Concrete
title_sort experimental investigation of the production of sustainable lightweight concrete
topic coarse aggregate
lightweight concrete
non-structural concrete
pumice
url https://etj.uotechnology.edu.iq/article_169228_28fa196a0687d9e3e7d548d4c4804140.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mouhammedjlafta experimentalinvestigationoftheproductionofsustainablelightweightconcrete