Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases
Background: Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) programs have improved neonatal healthcare since the 1960s. Genomic sequencing now offers potential to generate polygenic risk score (PRS) that could be incorporated into NBS programs, shifting the focus from treatment to prevention of future noncommunic...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-06-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Genetics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2023.1209762/full |
_version_ | 1797795189498052608 |
---|---|
author | Sarah Casauria Sarah Casauria Sharon Lewis Sharon Lewis Fiona Lynch Fiona Lynch Richard Saffery Richard Saffery |
author_facet | Sarah Casauria Sarah Casauria Sharon Lewis Sharon Lewis Fiona Lynch Fiona Lynch Richard Saffery Richard Saffery |
author_sort | Sarah Casauria |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) programs have improved neonatal healthcare since the 1960s. Genomic sequencing now offers potential to generate polygenic risk score (PRS) that could be incorporated into NBS programs, shifting the focus from treatment to prevention of future noncommunicable disease (NCD). However, Australian parents’ knowledge and attitudes regarding PRS for NBS is currently unknown.Methods: Parents with at least one Australian-born child under 18 years were invited via social media platforms to complete an online questionnaire aimed at examining parents’ knowledge of NCDs, PRS, and precision medicine, their opinions on receiving PRS for their child, and considerations of early-intervention strategies to prevent the onset of disease.Results: Of 126 participants, 90.5% had heard the term “non-communicable disease or chronic condition,” but only 31.8% and 34.4% were aware of the terms “polygenic risk score” and “precision medicine” respectively. A large proportion of participants said they would consider screening their newborn to receive a PRS for allergies (77.9%), asthma (81.0%), cancer (64.8%), cardiovascular disease (65.7%), mental illness (56.7%), obesity (49.5%), and type 2 diabetes (66.7%). Additionally, participants would primarily consider diet and exercise as interventions for specific NCDs.Discussion: The results from this study will inform future policy for genomic NBS, including expected rate of uptake and interventions that parents would consider employing to prevent the onset of disease. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T03:14:07Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8ea921d4b75b49ecba27b5ebb0d7d974 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-8021 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T03:14:07Z |
publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Genetics |
spelling | doaj.art-8ea921d4b75b49ecba27b5ebb0d7d9742023-06-26T07:32:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212023-06-011410.3389/fgene.2023.12097621209762Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseasesSarah Casauria0Sarah Casauria1Sharon Lewis2Sharon Lewis3Fiona Lynch4Fiona Lynch5Richard Saffery6Richard Saffery7Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaAustralian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaMurdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, AustraliaMurdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaMelbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, AustraliaMurdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, AustraliaBackground: Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) programs have improved neonatal healthcare since the 1960s. Genomic sequencing now offers potential to generate polygenic risk score (PRS) that could be incorporated into NBS programs, shifting the focus from treatment to prevention of future noncommunicable disease (NCD). However, Australian parents’ knowledge and attitudes regarding PRS for NBS is currently unknown.Methods: Parents with at least one Australian-born child under 18 years were invited via social media platforms to complete an online questionnaire aimed at examining parents’ knowledge of NCDs, PRS, and precision medicine, their opinions on receiving PRS for their child, and considerations of early-intervention strategies to prevent the onset of disease.Results: Of 126 participants, 90.5% had heard the term “non-communicable disease or chronic condition,” but only 31.8% and 34.4% were aware of the terms “polygenic risk score” and “precision medicine” respectively. A large proportion of participants said they would consider screening their newborn to receive a PRS for allergies (77.9%), asthma (81.0%), cancer (64.8%), cardiovascular disease (65.7%), mental illness (56.7%), obesity (49.5%), and type 2 diabetes (66.7%). Additionally, participants would primarily consider diet and exercise as interventions for specific NCDs.Discussion: The results from this study will inform future policy for genomic NBS, including expected rate of uptake and interventions that parents would consider employing to prevent the onset of disease.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2023.1209762/fullgenomic sequencingnewborn screeningnon-communicable diseasepolygenic risk scorequantitative |
spellingShingle | Sarah Casauria Sarah Casauria Sharon Lewis Sharon Lewis Fiona Lynch Fiona Lynch Richard Saffery Richard Saffery Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases Frontiers in Genetics genomic sequencing newborn screening non-communicable disease polygenic risk score quantitative |
title | Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases |
title_full | Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases |
title_fullStr | Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases |
title_short | Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases |
title_sort | australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non communicable diseases |
topic | genomic sequencing newborn screening non-communicable disease polygenic risk score quantitative |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2023.1209762/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sarahcasauria australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases AT sarahcasauria australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases AT sharonlewis australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases AT sharonlewis australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases AT fionalynch australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases AT fionalynch australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases AT richardsaffery australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases AT richardsaffery australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases |