Priorities in journal selection for authors, reviewers, editors, librarians and science funders
With this Forum contribution I wish to shed light on the problematic developments in scientific publishing resulting from the strong push of science funders towards gold open access (OA). This has given rise to numerous “predatory” journals, that maximise profit at the expense of scientific quality....
Main Author: | Jürgen Dengler |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Pensoft Publishers
2023-10-01
|
Series: | Vegetation Classification and Survey (VCS) |
Online Access: | https://vcs.pensoft.net/article/110296/download/pdf/ |
Similar Items
-
Funder priority for vaccines: Implications of a weak Lockean claim
by: Muralidharan, A, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Setting health research priorities using the CHNRI method: I. Involving funders
by: Igor Rudan, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01) -
The what, why and when of adapting interventions for new contexts: A qualitative study of researchers, funders, journal editors and practitioners' understandings.
by: Lauren Copeland, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Adapting population health interventions for new contexts: qualitative interviews understanding the experiences, practices and challenges of researchers, funders and journal editors
by: Graham Moore, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Top health research funders’ guidance on selecting journals for funded research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Larissa Shamseer, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)