Integrating power-to-gas in the biogas value chain: analysis of stakeholder perception and risk governance requirements
Abstract Background When integrating power-to-gas (PtG) in the biogas sector (BGS), it is essential to consider how risk is perceived and handled since it influences technology uptake, acceptance, and legitimacy. In this study, we aimed to identify factors that determine how risks are managed in the...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2019-09-01
|
| Series: | Energy, Sustainability and Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-019-0220-5 |
| _version_ | 1818442327954292736 |
|---|---|
| author | Johanny Pestalozzi Claudia Bieling Dirk Scheer Cordula Kropp |
| author_facet | Johanny Pestalozzi Claudia Bieling Dirk Scheer Cordula Kropp |
| author_sort | Johanny Pestalozzi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background When integrating power-to-gas (PtG) in the biogas sector (BGS), it is essential to consider how risk is perceived and handled since it influences technology uptake, acceptance, and legitimacy. In this study, we aimed to identify factors that determine how risks are managed in the BGS grounded on stakeholders’ perceptions of environmental and safety risks, and the socio-political, technological, and economic challenges associated with the adoption of PtG in this industry. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 experts located throughout Germany. They represented relevant institutions associated with the development of the BGS and PtG. Participants included expert stakeholders from science, industry, associations, and politics. The interview data were assessed by the use of thematic qualitative text analysis, followed by inductive reasoning, based on holistic and axial coding of the transcribed interviews. Results The participants predominantly trusted existing regulations to ascertain that environmental and safety risks from this energy concept are under control. The expert stakeholders were convinced that except for farm-based biogas facilities, there is adequate know-how in the BGS to appropriately manage risks of biogas and PtG technologies and thus prevent potential negative externalities. Furthermore, they were inclined to identify socio-political challenges, such as public criticism of biogas, and missing financial incentives as the most relevant matters to the development and adoption of PtG in this sector. The interviewees mainly identified politicians as responsible actors to handle identified risks and challenges. Such risk rationalities are characterized as hierarchist in the cultural theory of risk perception. Conclusions Possible reasons behind the prevailing high level of risk tolerance among the participants of this study could be related to (1) strong reliance on governmental action, technical protocols, and the perception that others are responsible for risk management in the BGS; (2) a high confidence in expertise in the biogas industry to control risks; and (3) the tendency of experts to advocate biogas and PtG, linked to possible professional roles and motivational factors. These aspects may influence them to attenuate the urgency to prevent accidents and environmental risks, even if this can have undesirable consequences when incorporating PtG in the biogas industry. While critical environmental and safety risks are not acknowledged and adequately tackled, societal controversies may accentuate to the disadvantage of the BGS and the potential benefits linked to the integration of PtG in this field. We recommend implementing measures that enhance risk awareness within this community, urge interest groups to adopt collaborative risk management strategies and consider the involvement of multiple stakeholders in risk assessment and control, and likewise, address the particularities of the social context in defining strategies for risk management and communication. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T18:42:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8ed7ea7bbc97451996cabbc08afd5a6f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2192-0567 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T18:42:24Z |
| publishDate | 2019-09-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Energy, Sustainability and Society |
| spelling | doaj.art-8ed7ea7bbc97451996cabbc08afd5a6f2022-12-21T22:51:27ZengBMCEnergy, Sustainability and Society2192-05672019-09-019111810.1186/s13705-019-0220-5Integrating power-to-gas in the biogas value chain: analysis of stakeholder perception and risk governance requirementsJohanny Pestalozzi0Claudia Bieling1Dirk Scheer2Cordula Kropp3Institute of Social Sciences in Agriculture, Chair of Societal Transition and Agriculture, University of HohenheimInstitute of Social Sciences in Agriculture, Chair of Societal Transition and Agriculture, University of HohenheimInstitute of Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis, Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyInstitute of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology with Focus on Risk and Technology Research, University of StuttgartAbstract Background When integrating power-to-gas (PtG) in the biogas sector (BGS), it is essential to consider how risk is perceived and handled since it influences technology uptake, acceptance, and legitimacy. In this study, we aimed to identify factors that determine how risks are managed in the BGS grounded on stakeholders’ perceptions of environmental and safety risks, and the socio-political, technological, and economic challenges associated with the adoption of PtG in this industry. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 experts located throughout Germany. They represented relevant institutions associated with the development of the BGS and PtG. Participants included expert stakeholders from science, industry, associations, and politics. The interview data were assessed by the use of thematic qualitative text analysis, followed by inductive reasoning, based on holistic and axial coding of the transcribed interviews. Results The participants predominantly trusted existing regulations to ascertain that environmental and safety risks from this energy concept are under control. The expert stakeholders were convinced that except for farm-based biogas facilities, there is adequate know-how in the BGS to appropriately manage risks of biogas and PtG technologies and thus prevent potential negative externalities. Furthermore, they were inclined to identify socio-political challenges, such as public criticism of biogas, and missing financial incentives as the most relevant matters to the development and adoption of PtG in this sector. The interviewees mainly identified politicians as responsible actors to handle identified risks and challenges. Such risk rationalities are characterized as hierarchist in the cultural theory of risk perception. Conclusions Possible reasons behind the prevailing high level of risk tolerance among the participants of this study could be related to (1) strong reliance on governmental action, technical protocols, and the perception that others are responsible for risk management in the BGS; (2) a high confidence in expertise in the biogas industry to control risks; and (3) the tendency of experts to advocate biogas and PtG, linked to possible professional roles and motivational factors. These aspects may influence them to attenuate the urgency to prevent accidents and environmental risks, even if this can have undesirable consequences when incorporating PtG in the biogas industry. While critical environmental and safety risks are not acknowledged and adequately tackled, societal controversies may accentuate to the disadvantage of the BGS and the potential benefits linked to the integration of PtG in this field. We recommend implementing measures that enhance risk awareness within this community, urge interest groups to adopt collaborative risk management strategies and consider the involvement of multiple stakeholders in risk assessment and control, and likewise, address the particularities of the social context in defining strategies for risk management and communication.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-019-0220-5BiogasPower-to-gasExpert risk perceptionRisk governanceRisk awarenessRisk amplification |
| spellingShingle | Johanny Pestalozzi Claudia Bieling Dirk Scheer Cordula Kropp Integrating power-to-gas in the biogas value chain: analysis of stakeholder perception and risk governance requirements Energy, Sustainability and Society Biogas Power-to-gas Expert risk perception Risk governance Risk awareness Risk amplification |
| title | Integrating power-to-gas in the biogas value chain: analysis of stakeholder perception and risk governance requirements |
| title_full | Integrating power-to-gas in the biogas value chain: analysis of stakeholder perception and risk governance requirements |
| title_fullStr | Integrating power-to-gas in the biogas value chain: analysis of stakeholder perception and risk governance requirements |
| title_full_unstemmed | Integrating power-to-gas in the biogas value chain: analysis of stakeholder perception and risk governance requirements |
| title_short | Integrating power-to-gas in the biogas value chain: analysis of stakeholder perception and risk governance requirements |
| title_sort | integrating power to gas in the biogas value chain analysis of stakeholder perception and risk governance requirements |
| topic | Biogas Power-to-gas Expert risk perception Risk governance Risk awareness Risk amplification |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-019-0220-5 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT johannypestalozzi integratingpowertogasinthebiogasvaluechainanalysisofstakeholderperceptionandriskgovernancerequirements AT claudiabieling integratingpowertogasinthebiogasvaluechainanalysisofstakeholderperceptionandriskgovernancerequirements AT dirkscheer integratingpowertogasinthebiogasvaluechainanalysisofstakeholderperceptionandriskgovernancerequirements AT cordulakropp integratingpowertogasinthebiogasvaluechainanalysisofstakeholderperceptionandriskgovernancerequirements |