Analgesia and sedation strategy for mechanically ventilated patients in the respiratory ICU

Background Mechanical ventilation is typically required for ICU patients as part of their care. This recommends the use of analgesia and sedation in a balanced strategy to alter patients’ comfort and assist synchronization with mechanical ventilation while avoiding the downsides of excessive sedatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dalia A E S El Embaby, Mai S Azab, Heba M Shalaby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ejcdt.eg.net/article.asp?issn=0422-7638;year=2023;volume=72;issue=3;spage=386;epage=392;aulast=El
_version_ 1797738809652150272
author Dalia A E S El Embaby
Mai S Azab
Heba M Shalaby
author_facet Dalia A E S El Embaby
Mai S Azab
Heba M Shalaby
author_sort Dalia A E S El Embaby
collection DOAJ
description Background Mechanical ventilation is typically required for ICU patients as part of their care. This recommends the use of analgesia and sedation in a balanced strategy to alter patients’ comfort and assist synchronization with mechanical ventilation while avoiding the downsides of excessive sedation. Objective The aim of the study was to compare between deep sedation and light sedation, analgesia, and no sedation strategies and their effects on the length of mechanical ventilation, and their effects on patients’ prognosis. Patients and methods This cohort prospective pilot study was conducted at the medical respiratory ICU at Ain Shams University Hospital in Cairo, Egypt, on 54 patients separated into four groups according to the type of sedation and analgesia suited for each patient’s severity condition. Results In this study, 54 mechanically ventilated patients in respiratory ICU were recruited. The patients were divided into group 1: no sedation or analgesia, group 2: analgesia only, group 3: light sedation, and group 4: deep sedation. There was a significant difference in Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score and severity%, although the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score and severity % were the highest in group 1 (25.53, 55.11%) and group 4 (23.40, 47.68%), but the prognosis was poorer in group 4 and was affected by deep sedation (100% death rate) than that in group 1 (60.0%). The average infusion rate of fentanyl and the total dose were significantly different between groups, the highest being in the deep sedation group. ICU length of stay was nonsignificant between groups but it was lower in group 4 (median: 9 days) than other groups. The average rate of dormicum infusion in the deep sedation group was 5 µg, while there was no daily vacation period; so, it can be explained that higher doses of sedation and analgesia in group 4 affected their prognosis to be poorer than other groups. Delirium occurred in 80% of group 4 patients, but only in 6.7% of subgroups, indicating a highly significant difference. Complications either metabolic, cardiac, or hematologic in the postextubation period were higher in group 4 (60%), than in group 1 (47.7%), group 2 (40%), and group 3 (15%). Conclusion Light sedation and analgesia strategies with daily sedation interruption would have a better survival outcome and cause fewer issues in patients, who were on mechanical ventilation than a heavy sedation approach.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T13:49:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8eecc18ad64d44eca66a57d104e92e40
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0422-7638
2090-9950
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T13:49:10Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
spelling doaj.art-8eecc18ad64d44eca66a57d104e92e402023-08-23T07:29:34ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsEgyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis0422-76382090-99502023-01-0172338639210.4103/ecdt.ecdt_81_22Analgesia and sedation strategy for mechanically ventilated patients in the respiratory ICUDalia A E S El EmbabyMai S AzabHeba M ShalabyBackground Mechanical ventilation is typically required for ICU patients as part of their care. This recommends the use of analgesia and sedation in a balanced strategy to alter patients’ comfort and assist synchronization with mechanical ventilation while avoiding the downsides of excessive sedation. Objective The aim of the study was to compare between deep sedation and light sedation, analgesia, and no sedation strategies and their effects on the length of mechanical ventilation, and their effects on patients’ prognosis. Patients and methods This cohort prospective pilot study was conducted at the medical respiratory ICU at Ain Shams University Hospital in Cairo, Egypt, on 54 patients separated into four groups according to the type of sedation and analgesia suited for each patient’s severity condition. Results In this study, 54 mechanically ventilated patients in respiratory ICU were recruited. The patients were divided into group 1: no sedation or analgesia, group 2: analgesia only, group 3: light sedation, and group 4: deep sedation. There was a significant difference in Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score and severity%, although the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score and severity % were the highest in group 1 (25.53, 55.11%) and group 4 (23.40, 47.68%), but the prognosis was poorer in group 4 and was affected by deep sedation (100% death rate) than that in group 1 (60.0%). The average infusion rate of fentanyl and the total dose were significantly different between groups, the highest being in the deep sedation group. ICU length of stay was nonsignificant between groups but it was lower in group 4 (median: 9 days) than other groups. The average rate of dormicum infusion in the deep sedation group was 5 µg, while there was no daily vacation period; so, it can be explained that higher doses of sedation and analgesia in group 4 affected their prognosis to be poorer than other groups. Delirium occurred in 80% of group 4 patients, but only in 6.7% of subgroups, indicating a highly significant difference. Complications either metabolic, cardiac, or hematologic in the postextubation period were higher in group 4 (60%), than in group 1 (47.7%), group 2 (40%), and group 3 (15%). Conclusion Light sedation and analgesia strategies with daily sedation interruption would have a better survival outcome and cause fewer issues in patients, who were on mechanical ventilation than a heavy sedation approach.http://www.ejcdt.eg.net/article.asp?issn=0422-7638;year=2023;volume=72;issue=3;spage=386;epage=392;aulast=Elanalgesia and sedationicumechanical ventilation
spellingShingle Dalia A E S El Embaby
Mai S Azab
Heba M Shalaby
Analgesia and sedation strategy for mechanically ventilated patients in the respiratory ICU
Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
analgesia and sedation
icu
mechanical ventilation
title Analgesia and sedation strategy for mechanically ventilated patients in the respiratory ICU
title_full Analgesia and sedation strategy for mechanically ventilated patients in the respiratory ICU
title_fullStr Analgesia and sedation strategy for mechanically ventilated patients in the respiratory ICU
title_full_unstemmed Analgesia and sedation strategy for mechanically ventilated patients in the respiratory ICU
title_short Analgesia and sedation strategy for mechanically ventilated patients in the respiratory ICU
title_sort analgesia and sedation strategy for mechanically ventilated patients in the respiratory icu
topic analgesia and sedation
icu
mechanical ventilation
url http://www.ejcdt.eg.net/article.asp?issn=0422-7638;year=2023;volume=72;issue=3;spage=386;epage=392;aulast=El
work_keys_str_mv AT daliaaeselembaby analgesiaandsedationstrategyformechanicallyventilatedpatientsintherespiratoryicu
AT maisazab analgesiaandsedationstrategyformechanicallyventilatedpatientsintherespiratoryicu
AT hebamshalaby analgesiaandsedationstrategyformechanicallyventilatedpatientsintherespiratoryicu