Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision

Sensitivity to spatial and temporal patterns is a fundamental aspect of vision. Herein, we investigated this sensitivity in adult zebrafish for a wide range of spatial (0.014 to 0.511 cycles/degree [c/d]) and temporal frequencies (0.025 to 6 cycles/second) to better understand their visual system. M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nadine eHollbach, Christoph eTappeiner, Anna eJazwinska, Volker eEnzmann, Markus eTschopp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00020/full
_version_ 1819154252458622976
author Nadine eHollbach
Nadine eHollbach
Christoph eTappeiner
Anna eJazwinska
Volker eEnzmann
Markus eTschopp
Markus eTschopp
author_facet Nadine eHollbach
Nadine eHollbach
Christoph eTappeiner
Anna eJazwinska
Volker eEnzmann
Markus eTschopp
Markus eTschopp
author_sort Nadine eHollbach
collection DOAJ
description Sensitivity to spatial and temporal patterns is a fundamental aspect of vision. Herein, we investigated this sensitivity in adult zebrafish for a wide range of spatial (0.014 to 0.511 cycles/degree [c/d]) and temporal frequencies (0.025 to 6 cycles/second) to better understand their visual system. Measurements were performed at photopic (1.8 log cd m-2) and scotopic (-4.5 log cd m-2) light levels to assess the optokinetic response. The resulting spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity functions revealed that the optokinetic response of zebrafish is tuned to spatial frequency and speed but not to temporal frequencies. Thereby, optimal test parameters for contrast sensitivity measurements were identified. At photopic light levels, a spatial frequency of 0.116 ± 0.01 c/d (mean ± SD) and a grating speed of 8.42 ± 2.15 degrees/second (d/s) was ideal; at scotopic light levels, these values were 0.110 ± 0.02 c/d and 5.45 ± 1.31 d/s, respectively. This study allows to better characterize zebrafish mutants with altered vision and to distinguish between defects of rod and cone photoreceptors as measurements were performed under different light conditions.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T15:18:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8efec2a285394e33988782f87cd90fe9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5137
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T15:18:08Z
publishDate 2015-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-8efec2a285394e33988782f87cd90fe92022-12-21T18:21:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience1662-51372015-03-01910.3389/fnsys.2015.00020116141Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish visionNadine eHollbach0Nadine eHollbach1Christoph eTappeiner2Anna eJazwinska3Volker eEnzmann4Markus eTschopp5Markus eTschopp6University of BernUniversity of BaselUniversity of BernUniversity of FribourgUniversity of BernUniversity of BernUniversity of BaselSensitivity to spatial and temporal patterns is a fundamental aspect of vision. Herein, we investigated this sensitivity in adult zebrafish for a wide range of spatial (0.014 to 0.511 cycles/degree [c/d]) and temporal frequencies (0.025 to 6 cycles/second) to better understand their visual system. Measurements were performed at photopic (1.8 log cd m-2) and scotopic (-4.5 log cd m-2) light levels to assess the optokinetic response. The resulting spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity functions revealed that the optokinetic response of zebrafish is tuned to spatial frequency and speed but not to temporal frequencies. Thereby, optimal test parameters for contrast sensitivity measurements were identified. At photopic light levels, a spatial frequency of 0.116 ± 0.01 c/d (mean ± SD) and a grating speed of 8.42 ± 2.15 degrees/second (d/s) was ideal; at scotopic light levels, these values were 0.110 ± 0.02 c/d and 5.45 ± 1.31 d/s, respectively. This study allows to better characterize zebrafish mutants with altered vision and to distinguish between defects of rod and cone photoreceptors as measurements were performed under different light conditions.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00020/fullContrast SensitivityOptokinetic Responseadult zebrafishspatiotemporal visionphotopicscotopic
spellingShingle Nadine eHollbach
Nadine eHollbach
Christoph eTappeiner
Anna eJazwinska
Volker eEnzmann
Markus eTschopp
Markus eTschopp
Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Contrast Sensitivity
Optokinetic Response
adult zebrafish
spatiotemporal vision
photopic
scotopic
title Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision
title_full Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision
title_fullStr Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision
title_full_unstemmed Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision
title_short Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision
title_sort photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision
topic Contrast Sensitivity
Optokinetic Response
adult zebrafish
spatiotemporal vision
photopic
scotopic
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00020/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nadineehollbach photopicandscotopicspatiotemporaltuningofadultzebrafishvision
AT nadineehollbach photopicandscotopicspatiotemporaltuningofadultzebrafishvision
AT christophetappeiner photopicandscotopicspatiotemporaltuningofadultzebrafishvision
AT annaejazwinska photopicandscotopicspatiotemporaltuningofadultzebrafishvision
AT volkereenzmann photopicandscotopicspatiotemporaltuningofadultzebrafishvision
AT markusetschopp photopicandscotopicspatiotemporaltuningofadultzebrafishvision
AT markusetschopp photopicandscotopicspatiotemporaltuningofadultzebrafishvision