Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision
Sensitivity to spatial and temporal patterns is a fundamental aspect of vision. Herein, we investigated this sensitivity in adult zebrafish for a wide range of spatial (0.014 to 0.511 cycles/degree [c/d]) and temporal frequencies (0.025 to 6 cycles/second) to better understand their visual system. M...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00020/full |
_version_ | 1819154252458622976 |
---|---|
author | Nadine eHollbach Nadine eHollbach Christoph eTappeiner Anna eJazwinska Volker eEnzmann Markus eTschopp Markus eTschopp |
author_facet | Nadine eHollbach Nadine eHollbach Christoph eTappeiner Anna eJazwinska Volker eEnzmann Markus eTschopp Markus eTschopp |
author_sort | Nadine eHollbach |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Sensitivity to spatial and temporal patterns is a fundamental aspect of vision. Herein, we investigated this sensitivity in adult zebrafish for a wide range of spatial (0.014 to 0.511 cycles/degree [c/d]) and temporal frequencies (0.025 to 6 cycles/second) to better understand their visual system. Measurements were performed at photopic (1.8 log cd m-2) and scotopic (-4.5 log cd m-2) light levels to assess the optokinetic response. The resulting spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity functions revealed that the optokinetic response of zebrafish is tuned to spatial frequency and speed but not to temporal frequencies. Thereby, optimal test parameters for contrast sensitivity measurements were identified. At photopic light levels, a spatial frequency of 0.116 ± 0.01 c/d (mean ± SD) and a grating speed of 8.42 ± 2.15 degrees/second (d/s) was ideal; at scotopic light levels, these values were 0.110 ± 0.02 c/d and 5.45 ± 1.31 d/s, respectively. This study allows to better characterize zebrafish mutants with altered vision and to distinguish between defects of rod and cone photoreceptors as measurements were performed under different light conditions. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T15:18:08Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8efec2a285394e33988782f87cd90fe9 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1662-5137 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T15:18:08Z |
publishDate | 2015-03-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience |
spelling | doaj.art-8efec2a285394e33988782f87cd90fe92022-12-21T18:21:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience1662-51372015-03-01910.3389/fnsys.2015.00020116141Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish visionNadine eHollbach0Nadine eHollbach1Christoph eTappeiner2Anna eJazwinska3Volker eEnzmann4Markus eTschopp5Markus eTschopp6University of BernUniversity of BaselUniversity of BernUniversity of FribourgUniversity of BernUniversity of BernUniversity of BaselSensitivity to spatial and temporal patterns is a fundamental aspect of vision. Herein, we investigated this sensitivity in adult zebrafish for a wide range of spatial (0.014 to 0.511 cycles/degree [c/d]) and temporal frequencies (0.025 to 6 cycles/second) to better understand their visual system. Measurements were performed at photopic (1.8 log cd m-2) and scotopic (-4.5 log cd m-2) light levels to assess the optokinetic response. The resulting spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity functions revealed that the optokinetic response of zebrafish is tuned to spatial frequency and speed but not to temporal frequencies. Thereby, optimal test parameters for contrast sensitivity measurements were identified. At photopic light levels, a spatial frequency of 0.116 ± 0.01 c/d (mean ± SD) and a grating speed of 8.42 ± 2.15 degrees/second (d/s) was ideal; at scotopic light levels, these values were 0.110 ± 0.02 c/d and 5.45 ± 1.31 d/s, respectively. This study allows to better characterize zebrafish mutants with altered vision and to distinguish between defects of rod and cone photoreceptors as measurements were performed under different light conditions.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00020/fullContrast SensitivityOptokinetic Responseadult zebrafishspatiotemporal visionphotopicscotopic |
spellingShingle | Nadine eHollbach Nadine eHollbach Christoph eTappeiner Anna eJazwinska Volker eEnzmann Markus eTschopp Markus eTschopp Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Contrast Sensitivity Optokinetic Response adult zebrafish spatiotemporal vision photopic scotopic |
title | Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision |
title_full | Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision |
title_fullStr | Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision |
title_full_unstemmed | Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision |
title_short | Photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision |
title_sort | photopic and scotopic spatiotemporal tuning of adult zebrafish vision |
topic | Contrast Sensitivity Optokinetic Response adult zebrafish spatiotemporal vision photopic scotopic |
url | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00020/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nadineehollbach photopicandscotopicspatiotemporaltuningofadultzebrafishvision AT nadineehollbach photopicandscotopicspatiotemporaltuningofadultzebrafishvision AT christophetappeiner photopicandscotopicspatiotemporaltuningofadultzebrafishvision AT annaejazwinska photopicandscotopicspatiotemporaltuningofadultzebrafishvision AT volkereenzmann photopicandscotopicspatiotemporaltuningofadultzebrafishvision AT markusetschopp photopicandscotopicspatiotemporaltuningofadultzebrafishvision AT markusetschopp photopicandscotopicspatiotemporaltuningofadultzebrafishvision |