<i>HESS Opinions</i> "Urgent water challenges are not sufficiently researched"

In this opinion paper we submit that water experts conduct comparatively little research on the more urgent challenges facing the global community. Five specific biases are identified. First, research in the field of water and sanitation is heavily biased against sanitation. Second, research on food...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. P. Darvis, J. Gupta, P. van der Zaag
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2009-06-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/905/2009/hess-13-905-2009.pdf
_version_ 1811285042349998080
author L. P. Darvis
J. Gupta
P. van der Zaag
author_facet L. P. Darvis
J. Gupta
P. van der Zaag
author_sort L. P. Darvis
collection DOAJ
description In this opinion paper we submit that water experts conduct comparatively little research on the more urgent challenges facing the global community. Five specific biases are identified. First, research in the field of water and sanitation is heavily biased against sanitation. Second, research on food security is biased in favour of conventional irrigation and fails to address the problems and opportunities of rainfed agriculture. Third, insufficient water research is dedicated to developmental compared to environmental issues. Fourth, too little research is conducted on adaptation to climate change by developing countries. And finally, research on water governance has a fascination for conflict but too little eye for cooperation and meeting basic needs. This paper illustrates these biases with bibliometric indicators extracted from the ISI Web of Science. There is a stark mismatch between the global demand for knowledge and the supply of it. This mismatch is identified here as a problem that we water scientists must confront and resolve. We still lack a full understanding why this divergence between demand and supply occurs and persists; an understanding that is required to guide us towards aligning our research priorities to societal demands. The paper, however, makes some inferences. On the one hand, we should promote the global South to create its own research biases and allow it to develop alternative solutions. Simultaneously we would benefit from critical examination of our own research practice. Although this paper addresses a critical challenge it does not aim to be exhaustive or definitive. We merely identify the persistence of intransigent water problems as a valid research object in itself.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:38:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8f0fab51fec047c2868d0aef63f22882
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:38:34Z
publishDate 2009-06-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-8f0fab51fec047c2868d0aef63f228822022-12-22T03:06:17ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382009-06-01136905912<i>HESS Opinions</i> "Urgent water challenges are not sufficiently researched"L. P. DarvisJ. GuptaP. van der ZaagIn this opinion paper we submit that water experts conduct comparatively little research on the more urgent challenges facing the global community. Five specific biases are identified. First, research in the field of water and sanitation is heavily biased against sanitation. Second, research on food security is biased in favour of conventional irrigation and fails to address the problems and opportunities of rainfed agriculture. Third, insufficient water research is dedicated to developmental compared to environmental issues. Fourth, too little research is conducted on adaptation to climate change by developing countries. And finally, research on water governance has a fascination for conflict but too little eye for cooperation and meeting basic needs. This paper illustrates these biases with bibliometric indicators extracted from the ISI Web of Science. There is a stark mismatch between the global demand for knowledge and the supply of it. This mismatch is identified here as a problem that we water scientists must confront and resolve. We still lack a full understanding why this divergence between demand and supply occurs and persists; an understanding that is required to guide us towards aligning our research priorities to societal demands. The paper, however, makes some inferences. On the one hand, we should promote the global South to create its own research biases and allow it to develop alternative solutions. Simultaneously we would benefit from critical examination of our own research practice. Although this paper addresses a critical challenge it does not aim to be exhaustive or definitive. We merely identify the persistence of intransigent water problems as a valid research object in itself.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/905/2009/hess-13-905-2009.pdf
spellingShingle L. P. Darvis
J. Gupta
P. van der Zaag
<i>HESS Opinions</i> "Urgent water challenges are not sufficiently researched"
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
title <i>HESS Opinions</i> "Urgent water challenges are not sufficiently researched"
title_full <i>HESS Opinions</i> "Urgent water challenges are not sufficiently researched"
title_fullStr <i>HESS Opinions</i> "Urgent water challenges are not sufficiently researched"
title_full_unstemmed <i>HESS Opinions</i> "Urgent water challenges are not sufficiently researched"
title_short <i>HESS Opinions</i> "Urgent water challenges are not sufficiently researched"
title_sort i hess opinions i urgent water challenges are not sufficiently researched
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/13/905/2009/hess-13-905-2009.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lpdarvis ihessopinionsiurgentwaterchallengesarenotsufficientlyresearched
AT jgupta ihessopinionsiurgentwaterchallengesarenotsufficientlyresearched
AT pvanderzaag ihessopinionsiurgentwaterchallengesarenotsufficientlyresearched