Turning the tables: A university league-table based on quality not quantity [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Turning the tables: A university league-table based on quality not quantity [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Background: Universities closely watch international league tables because these tables influence governments, donors and students. Achieving a high ranking in a table, or an annual rise in ranking, allows universities to promote their achievements using an externally validated measure. However, lea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Adrian G. Barnett, David Moher
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	F1000 Research Ltd 2019-07-01
Series:	F1000Research
Online Access:	https://f1000research.com/articles/8-583/v2

Similar Items

Turning the tables: A university league-table based on quality not quantity [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Adrian G. Barnett, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)

Automated detection of over- and under-dispersion in baseline tables in randomised controlled trials [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Adrian Barnett
Published: (2023-05-01)

League tables exposed
by: Abd Razak, Dzulkifli
Published: (2010)

The Politics of League Tables
by: Gita Steiner-Khamsi
Published: (2003-08-01)

GBS vaccines in the UK: a round table discussion [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Kirsty Le Doare, et al.
Published: (2024-05-01)

Value measurement theory and league tables
by: Theodor J. Stewart
Published: (2017-12-01)

NEW CIS UNIVERSITY LEAGUE TABLES - CORRELATIONS WITH THE WEBOMETRICS RANKINGS
by: Sergey V. Ablameyko, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01)

Hospital mortality league tables: influence of place of death.
by: Seagroatt, V, et al.
Published: (2004)

Turn it off and on again: characteristics and control of torpor [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
by: Anthony Pickering, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

Setting health priorities: the development of cost-effectiveness league tables
by: Julia Fox-Rushby, et al.

Child development with the D-score: turning milestones into measurement [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Stef van Buuren, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

Turning Points at the Round Table Talks
by: Daniel Druckman, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

Turning the tables-an interview with nicholas wade.
Published: (2005-09-01)

Practice Literate Research: Turning the Tables
by: Mike Fisher
Published: (2011-06-01)

Convergent validity and reliability of a novel repeated agility protocol in junior rugby league players [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Anthony Nicholls, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)

Incorporating natural variation into IVF clinic league tables: The Expected Rank
by: Eijkemans Marinus JC, et al.
Published: (2009-07-01)

Smaller clinical trials for decision making; a case study to show p-values are costly [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Nicholas Graves, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Turning up the heat on COVID-19: heat as a therapeutic intervention [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Marc Cohen
Published: (2020-07-01)

Turning the Tables in Nadine Gordimer’s The Pick Up
by: Hélène Godderis-Toudic
Published: (2007-05-01)

Ultrasound education in anaesthesia: Turning the tables on convention
by: Royse Colin
Published: (2008-01-01)

QALY league table of Iran: a practical method for better resource allocation
by: Reza Hashempour, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Convergent validity and reliability of a novel repeated agility protocol in junior rugby league players [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Anthony Nicholls, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01)

An international, cross-sectional survey of preprint attitudes among biomedical researchers [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Valerie Chow, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01)

Hobotnica: exploring molecular signature quality [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Luigi Marchionni, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01)

A Routing Table Poisoning Model for Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Botnets
by: Sumit Kumar Tetarave, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Westermann tables for the metal trade : materials, numerical quantities, forms/
by: Jutz, Hermann, et al.
Published: (1976)

Characteristics of bibliometric analyses of the complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine literature: A scoping review protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: L. Susan Wieland, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Dynamic participation in local energy communities with peer-to-peer trading [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Theresia Perger, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01)

The Table of 2022 Peer Reviewers for CTIM
by: Kathi J. Kemper
Published: (2023-03-01)

Mortality risk factors among National Football League players: An analysis using player career data [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Justin Ehrlich, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)

The city emptied and the homes and hospitals turned into 'the world'. A sociological approach [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Juan Coca, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)

Turning the Tables: Using Non-English Conversation Tables to Create Connections for International Students, Campus, and Community
by: Janet Eckerson, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)

New two-way discrete frequency table with application to English Premier League data
by: Mohammed, M. B., et al.
Published: (2022)

Turning The Tables: Using Wireless Communication Against An Attacker
by: Martinovic, I, et al.
Published: (2009)

Turning the tables : a Machiavellian strategy for dealing with Japan /
by: 343229 Burstein, Daniel
Published: (1993)

How to build phylogenetic species trees with OMA [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Yannis Nevers, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01)

Top health research funders’ guidance on selecting journals for funded research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Larissa Shamseer, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

Who and why do researchers opt to publish in post-publication peer review platforms? - findings from a review and survey of F1000 Research [version 1; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Jamie Kirkham, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

Addendum: Table 2.
by: Andrew A Farke, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01)

Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study. [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
by: Adrian G Barnett, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01)