Unmet family planning needs among female refugees and asylum seekers in Germany – is free access to family planning services enough? Results of a cross-sectional study

Abstract Background After the 1968 United Nations International Conference on Human Rights, access to family planning services became a human right. Such a service is of central importance to women’s empowerment and is empirically needed to provide adequate healthcare. For registered refugees and as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melisa Guelhan Inci, Nadja Kutschke, Sara Nasser, Sara Alavi, Ingar Abels, Christine Kurmeyer, Jalid Sehouli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-07-01
Series:Reproductive Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12978-020-00962-3
_version_ 1818885724901998592
author Melisa Guelhan Inci
Nadja Kutschke
Sara Nasser
Sara Alavi
Ingar Abels
Christine Kurmeyer
Jalid Sehouli
author_facet Melisa Guelhan Inci
Nadja Kutschke
Sara Nasser
Sara Alavi
Ingar Abels
Christine Kurmeyer
Jalid Sehouli
author_sort Melisa Guelhan Inci
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background After the 1968 United Nations International Conference on Human Rights, access to family planning services became a human right. Such a service is of central importance to women’s empowerment and is empirically needed to provide adequate healthcare. For registered refugees and asylum seekers in Germany complementary family planning services, including all forms of contraception, are free of charge. Yet, the success of these services remains unclear. The aim of this study is to describe the current reproductive health status of female refugees and to provide an initial overview of their existing unmet family planning and contraception needs. Methods Over the course of 2 years, from December 2015 to December 2017, a set of 50 female-only discussion groups were conducted in community shelters for registered refugees in Berlin. A total of 410 women between the ages of 14 and 74 participated. A convenience sampling strategy was then applied and a total of 307 semi-structured questionnaires covering 41 items related to demographic data and women’s health were distributed to volunteering female participants over the age of 17. The statistical analysis of the questionnaires was performed using SPSS (IBM, PASW, Version 24). P-values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Of the 307 participants, the majority were from Syria and Afghanistan (30% respectively). The mean age was 33 years (range: 18–63). On average, each woman had 2.5 births (range: 0–10). Twenty-four women (8%) were pregnant and fifty-four of the women (18%) were trying to become pregnant. The majority of women were classified as “requiring contraception” (n = 195; 63%) of which 183 gave further information on if and how they used family planning methods. The calculated unmet need for family planning in this group was 47%. Of the remaining 53% of the women who used contraception, many utilised “traditional” methods (34% withdrawal method; 8% calendar method) which have a pearl index of 4–18 and can therefore be classified as rather insufficient birth control methods. Intrauterine contraceptive devices were used by 30%. Conclusion Our study revealed that despite the provision of complementary family planning services, there remains unmet family planning and education needs in the female refugee community in Berlin. This study indicates that there is a major access gap to these services. Further research needs to be carried out to evaluate the access gap and clearly identify and implement action plans to address possible causes such as language barriers, lack of childcare and traumatic experiences.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T16:10:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8f2def1f6a344238bb3d675a9a81ae4a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1742-4755
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T16:10:00Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Reproductive Health
spelling doaj.art-8f2def1f6a344238bb3d675a9a81ae4a2022-12-21T20:14:46ZengBMCReproductive Health1742-47552020-07-011711910.1186/s12978-020-00962-3Unmet family planning needs among female refugees and asylum seekers in Germany – is free access to family planning services enough? Results of a cross-sectional studyMelisa Guelhan Inci0Nadja Kutschke1Sara Nasser2Sara Alavi3Ingar Abels4Christine Kurmeyer5Jalid Sehouli6Department of Gynecology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthDepartment of Gynecology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthDepartment of Gynecology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthDepartment of Gynecology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthMentoring Competence Center, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthWomen and equal opportunities officer, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthDepartment of Gynecology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthAbstract Background After the 1968 United Nations International Conference on Human Rights, access to family planning services became a human right. Such a service is of central importance to women’s empowerment and is empirically needed to provide adequate healthcare. For registered refugees and asylum seekers in Germany complementary family planning services, including all forms of contraception, are free of charge. Yet, the success of these services remains unclear. The aim of this study is to describe the current reproductive health status of female refugees and to provide an initial overview of their existing unmet family planning and contraception needs. Methods Over the course of 2 years, from December 2015 to December 2017, a set of 50 female-only discussion groups were conducted in community shelters for registered refugees in Berlin. A total of 410 women between the ages of 14 and 74 participated. A convenience sampling strategy was then applied and a total of 307 semi-structured questionnaires covering 41 items related to demographic data and women’s health were distributed to volunteering female participants over the age of 17. The statistical analysis of the questionnaires was performed using SPSS (IBM, PASW, Version 24). P-values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Of the 307 participants, the majority were from Syria and Afghanistan (30% respectively). The mean age was 33 years (range: 18–63). On average, each woman had 2.5 births (range: 0–10). Twenty-four women (8%) were pregnant and fifty-four of the women (18%) were trying to become pregnant. The majority of women were classified as “requiring contraception” (n = 195; 63%) of which 183 gave further information on if and how they used family planning methods. The calculated unmet need for family planning in this group was 47%. Of the remaining 53% of the women who used contraception, many utilised “traditional” methods (34% withdrawal method; 8% calendar method) which have a pearl index of 4–18 and can therefore be classified as rather insufficient birth control methods. Intrauterine contraceptive devices were used by 30%. Conclusion Our study revealed that despite the provision of complementary family planning services, there remains unmet family planning and education needs in the female refugee community in Berlin. This study indicates that there is a major access gap to these services. Further research needs to be carried out to evaluate the access gap and clearly identify and implement action plans to address possible causes such as language barriers, lack of childcare and traumatic experiences.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12978-020-00962-3GermanyRefugee healthFamily planningWomenContraceptive usePregnancy, unplanned
spellingShingle Melisa Guelhan Inci
Nadja Kutschke
Sara Nasser
Sara Alavi
Ingar Abels
Christine Kurmeyer
Jalid Sehouli
Unmet family planning needs among female refugees and asylum seekers in Germany – is free access to family planning services enough? Results of a cross-sectional study
Reproductive Health
Germany
Refugee health
Family planning
Women
Contraceptive use
Pregnancy, unplanned
title Unmet family planning needs among female refugees and asylum seekers in Germany – is free access to family planning services enough? Results of a cross-sectional study
title_full Unmet family planning needs among female refugees and asylum seekers in Germany – is free access to family planning services enough? Results of a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Unmet family planning needs among female refugees and asylum seekers in Germany – is free access to family planning services enough? Results of a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Unmet family planning needs among female refugees and asylum seekers in Germany – is free access to family planning services enough? Results of a cross-sectional study
title_short Unmet family planning needs among female refugees and asylum seekers in Germany – is free access to family planning services enough? Results of a cross-sectional study
title_sort unmet family planning needs among female refugees and asylum seekers in germany is free access to family planning services enough results of a cross sectional study
topic Germany
Refugee health
Family planning
Women
Contraceptive use
Pregnancy, unplanned
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12978-020-00962-3
work_keys_str_mv AT melisaguelhaninci unmetfamilyplanningneedsamongfemalerefugeesandasylumseekersingermanyisfreeaccesstofamilyplanningservicesenoughresultsofacrosssectionalstudy
AT nadjakutschke unmetfamilyplanningneedsamongfemalerefugeesandasylumseekersingermanyisfreeaccesstofamilyplanningservicesenoughresultsofacrosssectionalstudy
AT saranasser unmetfamilyplanningneedsamongfemalerefugeesandasylumseekersingermanyisfreeaccesstofamilyplanningservicesenoughresultsofacrosssectionalstudy
AT saraalavi unmetfamilyplanningneedsamongfemalerefugeesandasylumseekersingermanyisfreeaccesstofamilyplanningservicesenoughresultsofacrosssectionalstudy
AT ingarabels unmetfamilyplanningneedsamongfemalerefugeesandasylumseekersingermanyisfreeaccesstofamilyplanningservicesenoughresultsofacrosssectionalstudy
AT christinekurmeyer unmetfamilyplanningneedsamongfemalerefugeesandasylumseekersingermanyisfreeaccesstofamilyplanningservicesenoughresultsofacrosssectionalstudy
AT jalidsehouli unmetfamilyplanningneedsamongfemalerefugeesandasylumseekersingermanyisfreeaccesstofamilyplanningservicesenoughresultsofacrosssectionalstudy