Evaluation of the Performance of AmpliSeq and SureSelect Exome Sequencing Libraries for Ion Proton

Library preparation for whole-exome sequencing is a critical step serving the enrichment of the regions of interest. For Ion Proton, there are only two exome library preparation methods available, AmpliSeq and SureSelect. Although of major interest, a comparison of the two methods is hitherto missin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piyush Gampawar, Yasaman Saba, Ulrike Werner, Reinhold Schmidt, Bertram Müller-Myhsok, Helena Schmidt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2019.00856/full
_version_ 1818901192402534400
author Piyush Gampawar
Yasaman Saba
Ulrike Werner
Reinhold Schmidt
Bertram Müller-Myhsok
Bertram Müller-Myhsok
Bertram Müller-Myhsok
Helena Schmidt
author_facet Piyush Gampawar
Yasaman Saba
Ulrike Werner
Reinhold Schmidt
Bertram Müller-Myhsok
Bertram Müller-Myhsok
Bertram Müller-Myhsok
Helena Schmidt
author_sort Piyush Gampawar
collection DOAJ
description Library preparation for whole-exome sequencing is a critical step serving the enrichment of the regions of interest. For Ion Proton, there are only two exome library preparation methods available, AmpliSeq and SureSelect. Although of major interest, a comparison of the two methods is hitherto missing in the literature. Here, we systematically evaluate the performance of AmpliSeq and SureSelect and present an improved variant calling pipeline. We used 12 in-house DNA samples with genome-wide and exome microarray data and a commercially available reference DNA (NA12878) for evaluation. Both methods had a high concordance (>97%) with microarray genotypes and, when validating against NA12878, a sensitivity and positive predictive values of >93% and >80%, respectively. Application of our variant calling pipeline decreased the number of false positive variants dramatically by 90% and resulted in positive predictive value of 97%. This improvement is highly relevant in research as well as clinical setting.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T20:15:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8f30f84611344f23beef0b9dea364f7c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-8021
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T20:15:51Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Genetics
spelling doaj.art-8f30f84611344f23beef0b9dea364f7c2022-12-21T20:07:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212019-09-011010.3389/fgene.2019.00856477863Evaluation of the Performance of AmpliSeq and SureSelect Exome Sequencing Libraries for Ion ProtonPiyush Gampawar0Yasaman Saba1Ulrike Werner2Reinhold Schmidt3Bertram Müller-Myhsok4Bertram Müller-Myhsok5Bertram Müller-Myhsok6Helena Schmidt7Research Unit-Genetic Epidemiology, Gottfried Schatz Research Centre for Cell Signaling, Metabolism and Aging, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Medical University Graz, Graz, AustriaResearch Unit-Genetic Epidemiology, Gottfried Schatz Research Centre for Cell Signaling, Metabolism and Aging, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Medical University Graz, Graz, AustriaResearch Unit-Genetic Epidemiology, Gottfried Schatz Research Centre for Cell Signaling, Metabolism and Aging, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Medical University Graz, Graz, AustriaDepartment of Neurology, Clinical Division of Neurogeriatrics, Medical University Graz, Graz, AustriaMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, GermanyMunich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, GermanyInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United KingdomResearch Unit-Genetic Epidemiology, Gottfried Schatz Research Centre for Cell Signaling, Metabolism and Aging, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Medical University Graz, Graz, AustriaLibrary preparation for whole-exome sequencing is a critical step serving the enrichment of the regions of interest. For Ion Proton, there are only two exome library preparation methods available, AmpliSeq and SureSelect. Although of major interest, a comparison of the two methods is hitherto missing in the literature. Here, we systematically evaluate the performance of AmpliSeq and SureSelect and present an improved variant calling pipeline. We used 12 in-house DNA samples with genome-wide and exome microarray data and a commercially available reference DNA (NA12878) for evaluation. Both methods had a high concordance (>97%) with microarray genotypes and, when validating against NA12878, a sensitivity and positive predictive values of >93% and >80%, respectively. Application of our variant calling pipeline decreased the number of false positive variants dramatically by 90% and resulted in positive predictive value of 97%. This improvement is highly relevant in research as well as clinical setting.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2019.00856/fullexome sequencingion proton sequencerAmpliSeqSureSelectlibrary preparationvalidation
spellingShingle Piyush Gampawar
Yasaman Saba
Ulrike Werner
Reinhold Schmidt
Bertram Müller-Myhsok
Bertram Müller-Myhsok
Bertram Müller-Myhsok
Helena Schmidt
Evaluation of the Performance of AmpliSeq and SureSelect Exome Sequencing Libraries for Ion Proton
Frontiers in Genetics
exome sequencing
ion proton sequencer
AmpliSeq
SureSelect
library preparation
validation
title Evaluation of the Performance of AmpliSeq and SureSelect Exome Sequencing Libraries for Ion Proton
title_full Evaluation of the Performance of AmpliSeq and SureSelect Exome Sequencing Libraries for Ion Proton
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Performance of AmpliSeq and SureSelect Exome Sequencing Libraries for Ion Proton
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Performance of AmpliSeq and SureSelect Exome Sequencing Libraries for Ion Proton
title_short Evaluation of the Performance of AmpliSeq and SureSelect Exome Sequencing Libraries for Ion Proton
title_sort evaluation of the performance of ampliseq and sureselect exome sequencing libraries for ion proton
topic exome sequencing
ion proton sequencer
AmpliSeq
SureSelect
library preparation
validation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2019.00856/full
work_keys_str_mv AT piyushgampawar evaluationoftheperformanceofampliseqandsureselectexomesequencinglibrariesforionproton
AT yasamansaba evaluationoftheperformanceofampliseqandsureselectexomesequencinglibrariesforionproton
AT ulrikewerner evaluationoftheperformanceofampliseqandsureselectexomesequencinglibrariesforionproton
AT reinholdschmidt evaluationoftheperformanceofampliseqandsureselectexomesequencinglibrariesforionproton
AT bertrammullermyhsok evaluationoftheperformanceofampliseqandsureselectexomesequencinglibrariesforionproton
AT bertrammullermyhsok evaluationoftheperformanceofampliseqandsureselectexomesequencinglibrariesforionproton
AT bertrammullermyhsok evaluationoftheperformanceofampliseqandsureselectexomesequencinglibrariesforionproton
AT helenaschmidt evaluationoftheperformanceofampliseqandsureselectexomesequencinglibrariesforionproton