Concurrent nivolumab and external beam radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: A phase II study

Background and Aims: Nivolumab was the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is locally effective and may enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of concurrent nivoluma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bo Hyun Kim, Hee Chul Park, Tae Hyun Kim, Young-Hwan Koh, Jung Yong Hong, Yuri Cho, Dong Hyun Sinn, Boram Park, Joong-Won Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-04-01
Series:JHEP Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555923003221
_version_ 1797220547265822720
author Bo Hyun Kim
Hee Chul Park
Tae Hyun Kim
Young-Hwan Koh
Jung Yong Hong
Yuri Cho
Dong Hyun Sinn
Boram Park
Joong-Won Park
author_facet Bo Hyun Kim
Hee Chul Park
Tae Hyun Kim
Young-Hwan Koh
Jung Yong Hong
Yuri Cho
Dong Hyun Sinn
Boram Park
Joong-Won Park
author_sort Bo Hyun Kim
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: Nivolumab was the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is locally effective and may enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of concurrent nivolumab and EBRT in HCC with macrovascular invasion. Methods: In this phase II multicenter trial, patients with HCC and macrovascular invasion were concurrently treated with intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and EBRT, followed by maintenance nivolumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety, and secondary endpoints were overall survival, time-to-progression, objective response rate, and disease control rate. Results: Between January 2020 and June 2021, 50 patients (male 84%, median age 62.5) were enrolled; 47 (94.0%) and 13 (26.0%) with portal (Vp1/2, n = 21; Vp3, n = 23; Vp4, n = 3) and hepatic vein invasion, respectively. Patients received EBRT (median dose: 50 [IQR 43–50] Gy) after the first nivolumab dose. The median number of nivolumab doses was 8.5. Median PFS was 5.6 (90% CI 3.6–9.9) months. Median overall survival and time-to-progression were 15.2 (90% CI 10.8–19.6) and 5.6 (90% CI 3.6–9.9) months, respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 36.0% and 74.0%, respectively. The median duration of response was 9.9 months. Of 35 patients with follow-up data, 23 received subsequent systemic treatment, including atezolizumab-bevacizumab, sorafenib, lenvatinib, and regorafenib. Treatment-related any grade adverse events (AEs) and grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 40 (80.0%) and 6 (12.0%) patients, respectively. Common treatment-related AEs included pruritus (38.0%) and rash (16.0%), with no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion: Concurrent nivolumab therapy and EBRT showed encouraging PFS with acceptable safety in patients with advanced HCC and macrovascular invasion. Impact and implications: Immune checkpoint inhibitors, the standard care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), show relatively poor therapeutic effects in patients with advanced HCC and macrovascular invasion. In this investigator-initiated phase II study, we, for the first time, show that concurrent external beam radiation therapy with nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, led to encouraging progression-free survival in patients with HCC and macrovascular invasion. The concurrent treatment was tolerable without significant safety concerns. Further randomized studies investigating the combination of immunotherapy and external beam radiation therapy are required. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04611165
first_indexed 2024-03-07T16:53:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8f31677ff257430f8b7f01273edc0299
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2589-5559
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T12:51:16Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JHEP Reports
spelling doaj.art-8f31677ff257430f8b7f01273edc02992024-04-06T04:40:21ZengElsevierJHEP Reports2589-55592024-04-0164100991Concurrent nivolumab and external beam radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: A phase II studyBo Hyun Kim0Hee Chul Park1Tae Hyun Kim2Young-Hwan Koh3Jung Yong Hong4Yuri Cho5Dong Hyun Sinn6Boram Park7Joong-Won Park8Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of KoreaCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of KoreaCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of KoreaDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of KoreaCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of KoreaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of KoreaBiomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of KoreaCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Corresponding author. Address: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do 10408, Republic of Korea; Tel.: +82-31-920-1605, fax: +82-31-920-1520.Background and Aims: Nivolumab was the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is locally effective and may enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of concurrent nivolumab and EBRT in HCC with macrovascular invasion. Methods: In this phase II multicenter trial, patients with HCC and macrovascular invasion were concurrently treated with intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and EBRT, followed by maintenance nivolumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety, and secondary endpoints were overall survival, time-to-progression, objective response rate, and disease control rate. Results: Between January 2020 and June 2021, 50 patients (male 84%, median age 62.5) were enrolled; 47 (94.0%) and 13 (26.0%) with portal (Vp1/2, n = 21; Vp3, n = 23; Vp4, n = 3) and hepatic vein invasion, respectively. Patients received EBRT (median dose: 50 [IQR 43–50] Gy) after the first nivolumab dose. The median number of nivolumab doses was 8.5. Median PFS was 5.6 (90% CI 3.6–9.9) months. Median overall survival and time-to-progression were 15.2 (90% CI 10.8–19.6) and 5.6 (90% CI 3.6–9.9) months, respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 36.0% and 74.0%, respectively. The median duration of response was 9.9 months. Of 35 patients with follow-up data, 23 received subsequent systemic treatment, including atezolizumab-bevacizumab, sorafenib, lenvatinib, and regorafenib. Treatment-related any grade adverse events (AEs) and grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 40 (80.0%) and 6 (12.0%) patients, respectively. Common treatment-related AEs included pruritus (38.0%) and rash (16.0%), with no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion: Concurrent nivolumab therapy and EBRT showed encouraging PFS with acceptable safety in patients with advanced HCC and macrovascular invasion. Impact and implications: Immune checkpoint inhibitors, the standard care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), show relatively poor therapeutic effects in patients with advanced HCC and macrovascular invasion. In this investigator-initiated phase II study, we, for the first time, show that concurrent external beam radiation therapy with nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, led to encouraging progression-free survival in patients with HCC and macrovascular invasion. The concurrent treatment was tolerable without significant safety concerns. Further randomized studies investigating the combination of immunotherapy and external beam radiation therapy are required. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04611165http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555923003221hepatocellular carcinomanivolumabradiotherapycombination therapy
spellingShingle Bo Hyun Kim
Hee Chul Park
Tae Hyun Kim
Young-Hwan Koh
Jung Yong Hong
Yuri Cho
Dong Hyun Sinn
Boram Park
Joong-Won Park
Concurrent nivolumab and external beam radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: A phase II study
JHEP Reports
hepatocellular carcinoma
nivolumab
radiotherapy
combination therapy
title Concurrent nivolumab and external beam radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: A phase II study
title_full Concurrent nivolumab and external beam radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: A phase II study
title_fullStr Concurrent nivolumab and external beam radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: A phase II study
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent nivolumab and external beam radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: A phase II study
title_short Concurrent nivolumab and external beam radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: A phase II study
title_sort concurrent nivolumab and external beam radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion a phase ii study
topic hepatocellular carcinoma
nivolumab
radiotherapy
combination therapy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555923003221
work_keys_str_mv AT bohyunkim concurrentnivolumabandexternalbeamradiationtherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomawithmacrovascularinvasionaphaseiistudy
AT heechulpark concurrentnivolumabandexternalbeamradiationtherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomawithmacrovascularinvasionaphaseiistudy
AT taehyunkim concurrentnivolumabandexternalbeamradiationtherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomawithmacrovascularinvasionaphaseiistudy
AT younghwankoh concurrentnivolumabandexternalbeamradiationtherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomawithmacrovascularinvasionaphaseiistudy
AT jungyonghong concurrentnivolumabandexternalbeamradiationtherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomawithmacrovascularinvasionaphaseiistudy
AT yuricho concurrentnivolumabandexternalbeamradiationtherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomawithmacrovascularinvasionaphaseiistudy
AT donghyunsinn concurrentnivolumabandexternalbeamradiationtherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomawithmacrovascularinvasionaphaseiistudy
AT borampark concurrentnivolumabandexternalbeamradiationtherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomawithmacrovascularinvasionaphaseiistudy
AT joongwonpark concurrentnivolumabandexternalbeamradiationtherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomawithmacrovascularinvasionaphaseiistudy