Physicalism and moral responsibility: presentation of derivative consequence argument
In this paper, the author introduces the derivative consequence argument, which aims to demonstrate that moral responsibility is impossible in the world where physicalism and the strong realism about the laws of nature are both true. The basic intuition of the argument is that if the laws of natu...
Main Author: | B. V. Faul |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2020/%D0%A2.%205,%20%E2%84%96%204%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/57-60%20%D0%A4%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%20%D0%91.%20%D0%92..pdf |
Similar Items
-
Free Will and the Future of Humanity
by: Ruslan Myronenko
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Conditional analysis of free will and consequence argument
by: M. A. Sekatskaya
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Do we have (in)compatibilist intuitions? Surveying experimental research
by: Kiichi Inarimori, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01) -
Reflections on Sam Harris' "Free Will"
by: Daniel C. Dennett
Published: (2017-12-01) -
The Problems of Free Will and Moral Responsibility in Buddhist Ethics
by: Vlada A. Volkova
Published: (2024-03-01)