Sutureless vaginal hysterectomy

Introduction The ERBE BiClamp appears to be a secure and efficient technique of vaginal hysterectomy (VH). In this study, it provided proficient operative times, and minimum loss of blood and morbidity during the procedure with satisfactory outcomes. Its utilization plays a part in the enhancement o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mahmoud S Mahmoud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.azmj.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1687-1693;year=2020;volume=18;issue=4;spage=463;epage=469;aulast=Mahmoud
_version_ 1819285202481971200
author Mahmoud S Mahmoud
author_facet Mahmoud S Mahmoud
author_sort Mahmoud S Mahmoud
collection DOAJ
description Introduction The ERBE BiClamp appears to be a secure and efficient technique of vaginal hysterectomy (VH). In this study, it provided proficient operative times, and minimum loss of blood and morbidity during the procedure with satisfactory outcomes. Its utilization plays a part in the enhancement of minimally invasive gynecology and it should be promoted. Objective The aim was to evaluate the applicability of VH without suture ligation. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort study was carried out during the period between September 2017 and May 2019 in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Al-Azhar University Hospital, New Damietta. A total of 62 patients posted for VH for benign conditions were enrolled after informed consent. The patients were divided into two groups: the first included 32 cases for the BVS (BiClamp) and the second control group included 30 cases with conventional suture ligation. Results The use of an electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealer resulted in shorter operative time. The median procedure time in the electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealer group was 27.75 vs 43.5 min for the suture group (P=0.005). The median value of estimated blood loss was also statistically less with electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealer [85.8 ml vs 105.4 ml for the suture arm (P=0.043)]. The incidence of complications did not differ statistically between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Bipolar vessel sealer has shown a major decrease in intraoperative blood loss, procedure time, and hospital length of stay. Although complications and postoperative pain did not differ between the two groups, the sealer cases reported less visual analog scale scores compared with the other group.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T01:59:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8f3fbdd9c2bf4fb987a383c5931af7f1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1687-1693
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T01:59:31Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-8f3fbdd9c2bf4fb987a383c5931af7f12022-12-21T17:21:29ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAl-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal1687-16932020-01-0118446346910.4103/AZMJ.AZMJ_32_20Sutureless vaginal hysterectomyMahmoud S MahmoudIntroduction The ERBE BiClamp appears to be a secure and efficient technique of vaginal hysterectomy (VH). In this study, it provided proficient operative times, and minimum loss of blood and morbidity during the procedure with satisfactory outcomes. Its utilization plays a part in the enhancement of minimally invasive gynecology and it should be promoted. Objective The aim was to evaluate the applicability of VH without suture ligation. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort study was carried out during the period between September 2017 and May 2019 in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Al-Azhar University Hospital, New Damietta. A total of 62 patients posted for VH for benign conditions were enrolled after informed consent. The patients were divided into two groups: the first included 32 cases for the BVS (BiClamp) and the second control group included 30 cases with conventional suture ligation. Results The use of an electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealer resulted in shorter operative time. The median procedure time in the electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealer group was 27.75 vs 43.5 min for the suture group (P=0.005). The median value of estimated blood loss was also statistically less with electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealer [85.8 ml vs 105.4 ml for the suture arm (P=0.043)]. The incidence of complications did not differ statistically between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Bipolar vessel sealer has shown a major decrease in intraoperative blood loss, procedure time, and hospital length of stay. Although complications and postoperative pain did not differ between the two groups, the sealer cases reported less visual analog scale scores compared with the other group.http://www.azmj.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1687-1693;year=2020;volume=18;issue=4;spage=463;epage=469;aulast=Mahmoudbiclamphysterectomyhysterectomy/methodsminimally invasivesurgical proceduresuterine prolapsevaginal
spellingShingle Mahmoud S Mahmoud
Sutureless vaginal hysterectomy
Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal
biclamp
hysterectomy
hysterectomy/methods
minimally invasive
surgical procedures
uterine prolapse
vaginal
title Sutureless vaginal hysterectomy
title_full Sutureless vaginal hysterectomy
title_fullStr Sutureless vaginal hysterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Sutureless vaginal hysterectomy
title_short Sutureless vaginal hysterectomy
title_sort sutureless vaginal hysterectomy
topic biclamp
hysterectomy
hysterectomy/methods
minimally invasive
surgical procedures
uterine prolapse
vaginal
url http://www.azmj.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1687-1693;year=2020;volume=18;issue=4;spage=463;epage=469;aulast=Mahmoud
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoudsmahmoud suturelessvaginalhysterectomy