Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder Dichotomy

Corporate purpose has again become a topic of discussion in company law and corporate governance. In the European Union, the tension between the societal approach to companies with its long history and the efficiency-based approach with its much shorter history (and weaker basis) is palpable in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beate Sjåfjell, Jukka Mähönen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bond University 2024-03-01
Series:Bond Law Review
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.94050
_version_ 1797260486662684672
author Beate Sjåfjell
Jukka Mähönen
author_facet Beate Sjåfjell
Jukka Mähönen
author_sort Beate Sjåfjell
collection DOAJ
description Corporate purpose has again become a topic of discussion in company law and corporate governance. In the European Union, the tension between the societal approach to companies with its long history and the efficiency-based approach with its much shorter history (and weaker basis) is palpable in the heated debates ever since the European Commission launched its Sustainable Corporate Governance initiative in 2020. In this debate, shareholder primacy proponents have sought to frame the discussion within what we call a shareholder v stakeholder dichotomy. The dichotomy is misleading and dangerous in the way it takes company law proper out of the discussion and reinforces the shareholder primacy drive. We reject the dichotomy as a meaningful framing of the debate and seek to dismantle some of the strawmen set up on the road towards sustainable corporate governance. We instead discuss corporate purpose as a matter of company law and relevant to ensuring the contribution of business to sustainability, and how such an overarching purpose could be operationalised with a redefinition of duties of the board. With this backdrop, we analyse the Sustainable Corporate Governance initiative, concentrating on company law and sustainability aspects of the proposed Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T23:26:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8f48883fff9546d89a74ff87a2076034
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1033-4505
2202-4824
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T23:26:06Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Bond University
record_format Article
series Bond Law Review
spelling doaj.art-8f48883fff9546d89a74ff87a20760342024-03-16T00:39:43ZengBond UniversityBond Law Review1033-45052202-48242024-03-01342Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder DichotomyBeate SjåfjellJukka MähönenCorporate purpose has again become a topic of discussion in company law and corporate governance. In the European Union, the tension between the societal approach to companies with its long history and the efficiency-based approach with its much shorter history (and weaker basis) is palpable in the heated debates ever since the European Commission launched its Sustainable Corporate Governance initiative in 2020. In this debate, shareholder primacy proponents have sought to frame the discussion within what we call a shareholder v stakeholder dichotomy. The dichotomy is misleading and dangerous in the way it takes company law proper out of the discussion and reinforces the shareholder primacy drive. We reject the dichotomy as a meaningful framing of the debate and seek to dismantle some of the strawmen set up on the road towards sustainable corporate governance. We instead discuss corporate purpose as a matter of company law and relevant to ensuring the contribution of business to sustainability, and how such an overarching purpose could be operationalised with a redefinition of duties of the board. With this backdrop, we analyse the Sustainable Corporate Governance initiative, concentrating on company law and sustainability aspects of the proposed Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive.https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.94050
spellingShingle Beate Sjåfjell
Jukka Mähönen
Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder Dichotomy
Bond Law Review
title Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder Dichotomy
title_full Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder Dichotomy
title_fullStr Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder Dichotomy
title_full_unstemmed Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder Dichotomy
title_short Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder Dichotomy
title_sort corporate purpose and the misleading shareholder vs stakeholder dichotomy
url https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.94050
work_keys_str_mv AT beatesjafjell corporatepurposeandthemisleadingshareholdervsstakeholderdichotomy
AT jukkamahonen corporatepurposeandthemisleadingshareholdervsstakeholderdichotomy