Postoperative deep wound infection in posterior spinal fixation surgeries: Does it affect the clinicoradiological outcome? - At a minimum follow-up of 2 years

Background: Incidence of postoperative deep wound infection (PODWI) after lumbar surgery varies from 2.1% to 6.7%.Studies looking into the effect of postoperative infection on functional recovery of the patient have thrown conflicting results. The aim of this study is to evaluate 2-year functional a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saumyajit Basu, Amitava Biswas, Aditya Banta, Tarun Suri, Anil Solanki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Indian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2018;volume=1;issue=2;spage=128;epage=134;aulast=Basu
_version_ 1818618729270870016
author Saumyajit Basu
Amitava Biswas
Aditya Banta
Tarun Suri
Anil Solanki
author_facet Saumyajit Basu
Amitava Biswas
Aditya Banta
Tarun Suri
Anil Solanki
author_sort Saumyajit Basu
collection DOAJ
description Background: Incidence of postoperative deep wound infection (PODWI) after lumbar surgery varies from 2.1% to 6.7%.Studies looking into the effect of postoperative infection on functional recovery of the patient have thrown conflicting results. The aim of this study is to evaluate 2-year functional and radiological outcome of patients with PODWI. This was a retrospective, matched cohort study. Materials and Methods: A total of 23 patients developing acute PODWI (<3 months) after instrumented posterior spinal fusion (IPSF) from 2005 to 2013 were treated by debridement along with antibiotics for 6 weeks (3 weeks intravenous and 3 weeks oral). Their preoperative and postoperative (6 months and 2 years) functional scores in the form of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) were queried from the electronic database. Fusion was assessed at 2 years using radiograph and computed tomography scan. A noninfected control group (CG) was identified matching indication, type and number of levels of fusion, ODI, and Charlson Age-matched Comorbidity Index. Unpaired t-test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Out of 23 patients, 21 underwent posterior spinal fusion, and two had additional anterior surgery. Mean lag time before the diagnosis of infection was 4.7 weeks. Most common pathogenic organism was Staphylococcus aureus. All patients except one had documented fusion at 2-year follow-up. Four patients developed discharging sinuses. Implant removal had to be done in three patients. The mean ODI difference at 6 months from baseline was higher in the CG (33) as compared to infected group (19) (P < 0.001). Difference at 2 years was comparable for the two groups (P = 0.4). No significant difference was found in the VAS scores between the two groups. Small sample size and retrospective nature are the potential limitations of this study. Conclusions: Patients with acute PODWI after IPSF treated appropriately have comparable long-term outcome to patient with noninfected surgery; however, initial short-term worsening in functional status was seen in infected patients. Fusion was a predictable outcome.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T17:26:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8f5d3050ac8d40a8bfb0941a15f17812
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2589-5079
2589-5087
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T17:26:13Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Spine Journal
spelling doaj.art-8f5d3050ac8d40a8bfb0941a15f178122022-12-21T22:23:02ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Spine Journal2589-50792589-50872018-01-011212813410.4103/isj.isj_29_17Postoperative deep wound infection in posterior spinal fixation surgeries: Does it affect the clinicoradiological outcome? - At a minimum follow-up of 2 yearsSaumyajit BasuAmitava BiswasAditya BantaTarun SuriAnil SolankiBackground: Incidence of postoperative deep wound infection (PODWI) after lumbar surgery varies from 2.1% to 6.7%.Studies looking into the effect of postoperative infection on functional recovery of the patient have thrown conflicting results. The aim of this study is to evaluate 2-year functional and radiological outcome of patients with PODWI. This was a retrospective, matched cohort study. Materials and Methods: A total of 23 patients developing acute PODWI (<3 months) after instrumented posterior spinal fusion (IPSF) from 2005 to 2013 were treated by debridement along with antibiotics for 6 weeks (3 weeks intravenous and 3 weeks oral). Their preoperative and postoperative (6 months and 2 years) functional scores in the form of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) were queried from the electronic database. Fusion was assessed at 2 years using radiograph and computed tomography scan. A noninfected control group (CG) was identified matching indication, type and number of levels of fusion, ODI, and Charlson Age-matched Comorbidity Index. Unpaired t-test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Out of 23 patients, 21 underwent posterior spinal fusion, and two had additional anterior surgery. Mean lag time before the diagnosis of infection was 4.7 weeks. Most common pathogenic organism was Staphylococcus aureus. All patients except one had documented fusion at 2-year follow-up. Four patients developed discharging sinuses. Implant removal had to be done in three patients. The mean ODI difference at 6 months from baseline was higher in the CG (33) as compared to infected group (19) (P < 0.001). Difference at 2 years was comparable for the two groups (P = 0.4). No significant difference was found in the VAS scores between the two groups. Small sample size and retrospective nature are the potential limitations of this study. Conclusions: Patients with acute PODWI after IPSF treated appropriately have comparable long-term outcome to patient with noninfected surgery; however, initial short-term worsening in functional status was seen in infected patients. Fusion was a predictable outcome.http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2018;volume=1;issue=2;spage=128;epage=134;aulast=Basudeep wound infectionfunctional outcomeinstrumented posterior spinal fusion
spellingShingle Saumyajit Basu
Amitava Biswas
Aditya Banta
Tarun Suri
Anil Solanki
Postoperative deep wound infection in posterior spinal fixation surgeries: Does it affect the clinicoradiological outcome? - At a minimum follow-up of 2 years
Indian Spine Journal
deep wound infection
functional outcome
instrumented posterior spinal fusion
title Postoperative deep wound infection in posterior spinal fixation surgeries: Does it affect the clinicoradiological outcome? - At a minimum follow-up of 2 years
title_full Postoperative deep wound infection in posterior spinal fixation surgeries: Does it affect the clinicoradiological outcome? - At a minimum follow-up of 2 years
title_fullStr Postoperative deep wound infection in posterior spinal fixation surgeries: Does it affect the clinicoradiological outcome? - At a minimum follow-up of 2 years
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative deep wound infection in posterior spinal fixation surgeries: Does it affect the clinicoradiological outcome? - At a minimum follow-up of 2 years
title_short Postoperative deep wound infection in posterior spinal fixation surgeries: Does it affect the clinicoradiological outcome? - At a minimum follow-up of 2 years
title_sort postoperative deep wound infection in posterior spinal fixation surgeries does it affect the clinicoradiological outcome at a minimum follow up of 2 years
topic deep wound infection
functional outcome
instrumented posterior spinal fusion
url http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2018;volume=1;issue=2;spage=128;epage=134;aulast=Basu
work_keys_str_mv AT saumyajitbasu postoperativedeepwoundinfectioninposteriorspinalfixationsurgeriesdoesitaffecttheclinicoradiologicaloutcomeataminimumfollowupof2years
AT amitavabiswas postoperativedeepwoundinfectioninposteriorspinalfixationsurgeriesdoesitaffecttheclinicoradiologicaloutcomeataminimumfollowupof2years
AT adityabanta postoperativedeepwoundinfectioninposteriorspinalfixationsurgeriesdoesitaffecttheclinicoradiologicaloutcomeataminimumfollowupof2years
AT tarunsuri postoperativedeepwoundinfectioninposteriorspinalfixationsurgeriesdoesitaffecttheclinicoradiologicaloutcomeataminimumfollowupof2years
AT anilsolanki postoperativedeepwoundinfectioninposteriorspinalfixationsurgeriesdoesitaffecttheclinicoradiologicaloutcomeataminimumfollowupof2years