Indoor thermal comfort in different building blocks

This paper discusses the energy and comfort impact of three types of urban block configuration in the Netherlands. The annual heating and lighting energy demand, and summer thermal comfort hours are compared. In total, 102 thermal zones forming single, linear and courtyard building combinations are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Taleghani, Martin Tenpierik, Andy van den Dobbelsteen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Delft University of Technology 2014-12-01
Series:A+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/abe/article/view/6578
_version_ 1811154472666136576
author Mohammad Taleghani
Martin Tenpierik
Andy van den Dobbelsteen
author_facet Mohammad Taleghani
Martin Tenpierik
Andy van den Dobbelsteen
author_sort Mohammad Taleghani
collection DOAJ
description This paper discusses the energy and comfort impact of three types of urban block configuration in the Netherlands. The annual heating and lighting energy demand, and summer thermal comfort hours are compared. In total, 102 thermal zones forming single, linear and courtyard building combinations are simulated within the Netherlands’ temperate climate. The results demonstrate the importance of the surfaceto- volume ratio in achieving both annual energy ef ficiency and summer thermal comfort. Considering different types with 1-, 2- and 3-storey heights, the courtyard model has the lowest energy demand for heating and the highest number of summer thermal comfort hours.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:16:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8f672c5eb1b347239beae4635a122389
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2212-3202
2214-7233
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:16:12Z
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher Delft University of Technology
record_format Article
series A+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment
spelling doaj.art-8f672c5eb1b347239beae4635a1223892023-03-11T23:03:22ZengDelft University of TechnologyA+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment2212-32022214-72332014-12-01418Indoor thermal comfort in different building blocksMohammad Taleghani0Martin Tenpierik1Andy van den Dobbelsteen2TU Delft, Architecture and the Built Environment TU Delft, Architecture and the Built Environment TU Delft, Architecture and the Built Environment This paper discusses the energy and comfort impact of three types of urban block configuration in the Netherlands. The annual heating and lighting energy demand, and summer thermal comfort hours are compared. In total, 102 thermal zones forming single, linear and courtyard building combinations are simulated within the Netherlands’ temperate climate. The results demonstrate the importance of the surfaceto- volume ratio in achieving both annual energy ef ficiency and summer thermal comfort. Considering different types with 1-, 2- and 3-storey heights, the courtyard model has the lowest energy demand for heating and the highest number of summer thermal comfort hours. https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/abe/article/view/6578Energy usethermal comforturban block types
spellingShingle Mohammad Taleghani
Martin Tenpierik
Andy van den Dobbelsteen
Indoor thermal comfort in different building blocks
A+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment
Energy use
thermal comfort
urban block types
title Indoor thermal comfort in different building blocks
title_full Indoor thermal comfort in different building blocks
title_fullStr Indoor thermal comfort in different building blocks
title_full_unstemmed Indoor thermal comfort in different building blocks
title_short Indoor thermal comfort in different building blocks
title_sort indoor thermal comfort in different building blocks
topic Energy use
thermal comfort
urban block types
url https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/abe/article/view/6578
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadtaleghani indoorthermalcomfortindifferentbuildingblocks
AT martintenpierik indoorthermalcomfortindifferentbuildingblocks
AT andyvandendobbelsteen indoorthermalcomfortindifferentbuildingblocks