Effects of different chicken protein sources on palatability in dry adult dog food

As the demand for dog food production continues to rise, along with the number of dogs per household in the US, sustainable ingredients must be considered for the pet food industry. Consumers have a negative perspective when it comes to animal by-products in their pet’s food. However, animal by-prod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chelsie J. Shields, Nicholas L. Rozzi, Charles G. Aldrich, Martin J. Talavera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Animal Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fanim.2023.1292658/full
_version_ 1797456798926503936
author Chelsie J. Shields
Nicholas L. Rozzi
Charles G. Aldrich
Martin J. Talavera
author_facet Chelsie J. Shields
Nicholas L. Rozzi
Charles G. Aldrich
Martin J. Talavera
author_sort Chelsie J. Shields
collection DOAJ
description As the demand for dog food production continues to rise, along with the number of dogs per household in the US, sustainable ingredients must be considered for the pet food industry. Consumers have a negative perspective when it comes to animal by-products in their pet’s food. However, animal by-products contribute a quality source of dietary protein, vitamins, and minerals which contribute to nutritionally complete pet foods. Along with being nutritionally complete, foods must also appeal to the dog while eating. The objective of this study was to produce formulas utilizing four different chicken protein sources, and to evaluate the effects of those protein sources on palatability in dogs. Five treatments were produced, through extrusion, using fresh mechanically deboned chicken at two different inclusion levels: (FMDC14 and FMDC25), dried chicken (DC), chicken meal (CM), and chicken by-product meal (CBPM). Four trained panels of twenty-five adult dogs, made up of majority Beagles, randomly divided by sex, were used for palatability testing using the two-bowl test. Based on the palatability results from this study, the CBPM treatment was preferred (p<0.05) over the FMDC14, FMDC25, and DC treatments. The CBPM treatment was at parity to the CM treatment (p>0.05). It can be concluded that the CBPM treatment was considered palatable to the dogs.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:13:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8f83a81f141342439908346e65b477a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-6225
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:13:01Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Animal Science
spelling doaj.art-8f83a81f141342439908346e65b477a52023-11-24T16:03:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Animal Science2673-62252023-11-01410.3389/fanim.2023.12926581292658Effects of different chicken protein sources on palatability in dry adult dog foodChelsie J. Shields0Nicholas L. Rozzi1Charles G. Aldrich2Martin J. Talavera3Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Topeka, KS, United StatesHill’s Pet Nutrition, Topeka, KS, United StatesDepartment of Grain Science & Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United StatesDepartment of Food, Nutrition, Dietetics and Health, Kansas State University, Olathe, KS, United StatesAs the demand for dog food production continues to rise, along with the number of dogs per household in the US, sustainable ingredients must be considered for the pet food industry. Consumers have a negative perspective when it comes to animal by-products in their pet’s food. However, animal by-products contribute a quality source of dietary protein, vitamins, and minerals which contribute to nutritionally complete pet foods. Along with being nutritionally complete, foods must also appeal to the dog while eating. The objective of this study was to produce formulas utilizing four different chicken protein sources, and to evaluate the effects of those protein sources on palatability in dogs. Five treatments were produced, through extrusion, using fresh mechanically deboned chicken at two different inclusion levels: (FMDC14 and FMDC25), dried chicken (DC), chicken meal (CM), and chicken by-product meal (CBPM). Four trained panels of twenty-five adult dogs, made up of majority Beagles, randomly divided by sex, were used for palatability testing using the two-bowl test. Based on the palatability results from this study, the CBPM treatment was preferred (p<0.05) over the FMDC14, FMDC25, and DC treatments. The CBPM treatment was at parity to the CM treatment (p>0.05). It can be concluded that the CBPM treatment was considered palatable to the dogs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fanim.2023.1292658/fullcaninechicken by-product mealchicken proteindog foodpalatability
spellingShingle Chelsie J. Shields
Nicholas L. Rozzi
Charles G. Aldrich
Martin J. Talavera
Effects of different chicken protein sources on palatability in dry adult dog food
Frontiers in Animal Science
canine
chicken by-product meal
chicken protein
dog food
palatability
title Effects of different chicken protein sources on palatability in dry adult dog food
title_full Effects of different chicken protein sources on palatability in dry adult dog food
title_fullStr Effects of different chicken protein sources on palatability in dry adult dog food
title_full_unstemmed Effects of different chicken protein sources on palatability in dry adult dog food
title_short Effects of different chicken protein sources on palatability in dry adult dog food
title_sort effects of different chicken protein sources on palatability in dry adult dog food
topic canine
chicken by-product meal
chicken protein
dog food
palatability
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fanim.2023.1292658/full
work_keys_str_mv AT chelsiejshields effectsofdifferentchickenproteinsourcesonpalatabilityindryadultdogfood
AT nicholaslrozzi effectsofdifferentchickenproteinsourcesonpalatabilityindryadultdogfood
AT charlesgaldrich effectsofdifferentchickenproteinsourcesonpalatabilityindryadultdogfood
AT martinjtalavera effectsofdifferentchickenproteinsourcesonpalatabilityindryadultdogfood