Chronic Tennis Elbow Treated by Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Steroid Injections: A Comparative Study

Background: Painful elbow joint over the lateral epicondyle especially with resisted wrist extension are common signs of lateral epicondyle tendinopathy, also called tennis elbow. Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcome of local platelet rich plasma (PRP) injection in patients with chronic t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohammed Sh. Al-Edanni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Baghdad/ Al-Kindy College of Medicine 2020-01-01
Series:مجله كليه طب الكندي
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jkmc.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/MEDICAL/article/view/158
_version_ 1798036859967766528
author Mohammed Sh. Al-Edanni
author_facet Mohammed Sh. Al-Edanni
author_sort Mohammed Sh. Al-Edanni
collection DOAJ
description Background: Painful elbow joint over the lateral epicondyle especially with resisted wrist extension are common signs of lateral epicondyle tendinopathy, also called tennis elbow. Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcome of local platelet rich plasma (PRP) injection in patients with chronic tennis elbow compared with a steroid (Depomedrol 40 mg) injection. Methods: A total of 88 patients with chronic tennis elbow were treated at Al-Kindy Teaching Hospital and private clinics. All patients had chronic pain for about 24 weeks or more and had failed first line treatment. The patients dividing into two groups, Group A injected with PRP (n = 44), and group B injected with depomedrol 40 mg (n = 44). A good clinical result was demarcated as 25% or more progress on the visual analog scale for pain. All patients followed for 6 months in both group for clinical successful result. Results: At three months (n = 44), in group A reported a perfection of 58.2% in their pain scores while 49.3% in the group B (N = 44). At 6 months follow up, the group A informed a perfection of 74.3% in their pain scores while 58.4 % in the group B. The local elbow tenderness recording at three months was 37.4% in the group A, while in the group B was 48.4%. At six months, 16.1% versus 30.2%   recounted major elbow tenderness (P = .009) in groups (A and B) respectively. The clinical improvement rates at three months revealed no changes between both groups while it showed more significant clinically changes in group A ( 87.1%) than in group B (70.1 %) with P value = 0.008 after six months follow up. Conclusion: No important changes were found at 3 months in both groups, but at 6months, clinical significant perfections in patients treated with PRP group (group A)
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:18:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8f83f33b119948edb18117707f93626f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1810-9543
2521-4365
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:18:46Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher University of Baghdad/ Al-Kindy College of Medicine
record_format Article
series مجله كليه طب الكندي
spelling doaj.art-8f83f33b119948edb18117707f93626f2022-12-22T04:02:44ZengUniversity of Baghdad/ Al-Kindy College of Medicineمجله كليه طب الكندي1810-95432521-43652020-01-0115210.47723/kcmj.v15i2.158Chronic Tennis Elbow Treated by Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Steroid Injections: A Comparative StudyMohammed Sh. Al-Edanni Background: Painful elbow joint over the lateral epicondyle especially with resisted wrist extension are common signs of lateral epicondyle tendinopathy, also called tennis elbow. Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcome of local platelet rich plasma (PRP) injection in patients with chronic tennis elbow compared with a steroid (Depomedrol 40 mg) injection. Methods: A total of 88 patients with chronic tennis elbow were treated at Al-Kindy Teaching Hospital and private clinics. All patients had chronic pain for about 24 weeks or more and had failed first line treatment. The patients dividing into two groups, Group A injected with PRP (n = 44), and group B injected with depomedrol 40 mg (n = 44). A good clinical result was demarcated as 25% or more progress on the visual analog scale for pain. All patients followed for 6 months in both group for clinical successful result. Results: At three months (n = 44), in group A reported a perfection of 58.2% in their pain scores while 49.3% in the group B (N = 44). At 6 months follow up, the group A informed a perfection of 74.3% in their pain scores while 58.4 % in the group B. The local elbow tenderness recording at three months was 37.4% in the group A, while in the group B was 48.4%. At six months, 16.1% versus 30.2%   recounted major elbow tenderness (P = .009) in groups (A and B) respectively. The clinical improvement rates at three months revealed no changes between both groups while it showed more significant clinically changes in group A ( 87.1%) than in group B (70.1 %) with P value = 0.008 after six months follow up. Conclusion: No important changes were found at 3 months in both groups, but at 6months, clinical significant perfections in patients treated with PRP group (group A) https://jkmc.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/MEDICAL/article/view/158platelet-rich plasma, steroid, tennis elbow.
spellingShingle Mohammed Sh. Al-Edanni
Chronic Tennis Elbow Treated by Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Steroid Injections: A Comparative Study
مجله كليه طب الكندي
platelet-rich plasma, steroid, tennis elbow.
title Chronic Tennis Elbow Treated by Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Steroid Injections: A Comparative Study
title_full Chronic Tennis Elbow Treated by Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Steroid Injections: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Chronic Tennis Elbow Treated by Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Steroid Injections: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Chronic Tennis Elbow Treated by Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Steroid Injections: A Comparative Study
title_short Chronic Tennis Elbow Treated by Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Steroid Injections: A Comparative Study
title_sort chronic tennis elbow treated by platelet rich plasma versus steroid injections a comparative study
topic platelet-rich plasma, steroid, tennis elbow.
url https://jkmc.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/MEDICAL/article/view/158
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedshaledanni chronictenniselbowtreatedbyplateletrichplasmaversussteroidinjectionsacomparativestudy