The Effect of Captivity on the Dynamics of Active Bacterial Communities Differs Between Two Deep-Sea Coral Species
Microbes play a crucial role in sustaining the coral holobiont’s functions and in particular under the pressure of environmental stressors. The effect of a changing environment on coral health is now a major branch of research that relies heavily on aquarium experiments. However, the effect of capti...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Microbiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02565/full |
_version_ | 1819207936382074880 |
---|---|
author | Pierre E. Galand Leila Chapron Anne-Leila Meistertzheim Erwan Peru Franck Lartaud |
author_facet | Pierre E. Galand Leila Chapron Anne-Leila Meistertzheim Erwan Peru Franck Lartaud |
author_sort | Pierre E. Galand |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Microbes play a crucial role in sustaining the coral holobiont’s functions and in particular under the pressure of environmental stressors. The effect of a changing environment on coral health is now a major branch of research that relies heavily on aquarium experiments. However, the effect of captivity on the coral microbiome remains poorly known. Here we show that different cold-water corals species have different microbiome responses to captivity. For both the DNA and the RNA fraction, Madrepora oculata bacterial communities were maintained for at least 6 months of aquarium rearing, while Lophelia pertusa bacteria changed within a day. Interestingly, bacteria from the genus Endozoicomonas, a ubiquitous symbiont of numerous marine hosts, were resilient and remained active in M. oculata for several months. Our results demonstrate that a good knowledge of the coral microbiome and an understanding of the ecological strategy of the holobiont is needed before designing aquarium experiments. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-23T05:31:25Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8f91cc8b87964a4a9bfc9cc35e8c720b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-302X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-23T05:31:25Z |
publishDate | 2018-10-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Microbiology |
spelling | doaj.art-8f91cc8b87964a4a9bfc9cc35e8c720b2022-12-21T17:58:27ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2018-10-01910.3389/fmicb.2018.02565417796The Effect of Captivity on the Dynamics of Active Bacterial Communities Differs Between Two Deep-Sea Coral SpeciesPierre E. Galand0Leila Chapron1Anne-Leila Meistertzheim2Erwan Peru3Franck Lartaud4Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire d’Ecogéochimie des Environnements Benthiques (LECOB), Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls, Banyuls-sur-Mer, FranceSorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire d’Ecogéochimie des Environnements Benthiques (LECOB), Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls, Banyuls-sur-Mer, FranceSorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire d’Océanographie Microbienne (LOMIC), Banyuls-sur-Mer, FranceSorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire d’Ecogéochimie des Environnements Benthiques (LECOB), Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls, Banyuls-sur-Mer, FranceSorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire d’Ecogéochimie des Environnements Benthiques (LECOB), Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls, Banyuls-sur-Mer, FranceMicrobes play a crucial role in sustaining the coral holobiont’s functions and in particular under the pressure of environmental stressors. The effect of a changing environment on coral health is now a major branch of research that relies heavily on aquarium experiments. However, the effect of captivity on the coral microbiome remains poorly known. Here we show that different cold-water corals species have different microbiome responses to captivity. For both the DNA and the RNA fraction, Madrepora oculata bacterial communities were maintained for at least 6 months of aquarium rearing, while Lophelia pertusa bacteria changed within a day. Interestingly, bacteria from the genus Endozoicomonas, a ubiquitous symbiont of numerous marine hosts, were resilient and remained active in M. oculata for several months. Our results demonstrate that a good knowledge of the coral microbiome and an understanding of the ecological strategy of the holobiont is needed before designing aquarium experiments.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02565/fullLophelia pertusaMadrepora oculataDNA/RNAbacteriaaquaria experiment |
spellingShingle | Pierre E. Galand Leila Chapron Anne-Leila Meistertzheim Erwan Peru Franck Lartaud The Effect of Captivity on the Dynamics of Active Bacterial Communities Differs Between Two Deep-Sea Coral Species Frontiers in Microbiology Lophelia pertusa Madrepora oculata DNA/RNA bacteria aquaria experiment |
title | The Effect of Captivity on the Dynamics of Active Bacterial Communities Differs Between Two Deep-Sea Coral Species |
title_full | The Effect of Captivity on the Dynamics of Active Bacterial Communities Differs Between Two Deep-Sea Coral Species |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Captivity on the Dynamics of Active Bacterial Communities Differs Between Two Deep-Sea Coral Species |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Captivity on the Dynamics of Active Bacterial Communities Differs Between Two Deep-Sea Coral Species |
title_short | The Effect of Captivity on the Dynamics of Active Bacterial Communities Differs Between Two Deep-Sea Coral Species |
title_sort | effect of captivity on the dynamics of active bacterial communities differs between two deep sea coral species |
topic | Lophelia pertusa Madrepora oculata DNA/RNA bacteria aquaria experiment |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02565/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pierreegaland theeffectofcaptivityonthedynamicsofactivebacterialcommunitiesdiffersbetweentwodeepseacoralspecies AT leilachapron theeffectofcaptivityonthedynamicsofactivebacterialcommunitiesdiffersbetweentwodeepseacoralspecies AT anneleilameistertzheim theeffectofcaptivityonthedynamicsofactivebacterialcommunitiesdiffersbetweentwodeepseacoralspecies AT erwanperu theeffectofcaptivityonthedynamicsofactivebacterialcommunitiesdiffersbetweentwodeepseacoralspecies AT francklartaud theeffectofcaptivityonthedynamicsofactivebacterialcommunitiesdiffersbetweentwodeepseacoralspecies AT pierreegaland effectofcaptivityonthedynamicsofactivebacterialcommunitiesdiffersbetweentwodeepseacoralspecies AT leilachapron effectofcaptivityonthedynamicsofactivebacterialcommunitiesdiffersbetweentwodeepseacoralspecies AT anneleilameistertzheim effectofcaptivityonthedynamicsofactivebacterialcommunitiesdiffersbetweentwodeepseacoralspecies AT erwanperu effectofcaptivityonthedynamicsofactivebacterialcommunitiesdiffersbetweentwodeepseacoralspecies AT francklartaud effectofcaptivityonthedynamicsofactivebacterialcommunitiesdiffersbetweentwodeepseacoralspecies |