A GRASP Meta-Heuristic for Evaluating the Latency and Lifetime Impact of Critical Nodes in Large Wireless Sensor Networks

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) have lately been gaining momentum thanks to the hardware improvements and standardization software efforts. Moreover, the appearance of Internet of Things (IoT) and its reliance on sensors are helping to widely extend the usage of WSNs. However, such networks present d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Sembroiz, Behnam Ojaghi, Davide Careglio, Sergio Ricciardi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-10-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/21/4564
_version_ 1818859714244509696
author David Sembroiz
Behnam Ojaghi
Davide Careglio
Sergio Ricciardi
author_facet David Sembroiz
Behnam Ojaghi
Davide Careglio
Sergio Ricciardi
author_sort David Sembroiz
collection DOAJ
description Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) have lately been gaining momentum thanks to the hardware improvements and standardization software efforts. Moreover, the appearance of Internet of Things (IoT) and its reliance on sensors are helping to widely extend the usage of WSNs. However, such networks present drawbacks, mainly because of limited sensor batteries and their vulnerability against physical attacks due to the lack of protection and security. Additionally, not all the sensors inside the network have the same responsibility in terms of traffic handling. In this paper, we firstly analyze the fact that some nodes are more <i>critical</i> than others, considering the most <i>critical node</i> the one that, once incapacitated, causes the most deterioration on the network performance. Such performance is analyzed using two metrics, namely network latency and lifetime. We present a result comparison between a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) model and a Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure (GRASP) meta-heuristic for small networks. For bigger networks, GRASP meta-heuristic results are presented to understand how the network degrades as the number of both <i>critical</i> and network nodes increase, by distributing them into two different areas: fixed and incremental to maintain node density.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T09:16:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8fa8244d1cce4a08af7fb1ec949503fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T09:16:34Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-8fa8244d1cce4a08af7fb1ec949503fc2022-12-21T20:28:06ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172019-10-01921456410.3390/app9214564app9214564A GRASP Meta-Heuristic for Evaluating the Latency and Lifetime Impact of Critical Nodes in Large Wireless Sensor NetworksDavid Sembroiz0Behnam Ojaghi1Davide Careglio2Sergio Ricciardi3Department of Computer Architecture, Technical University of Catalonia—BarcelonaTech (UPC), 08034 Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Computer Engineering, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, 06560 Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Computer Architecture, Technical University of Catalonia—BarcelonaTech (UPC), 08034 Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Computer Architecture, Technical University of Catalonia—BarcelonaTech (UPC), 08034 Barcelona, SpainWireless Sensor Networks (WSN) have lately been gaining momentum thanks to the hardware improvements and standardization software efforts. Moreover, the appearance of Internet of Things (IoT) and its reliance on sensors are helping to widely extend the usage of WSNs. However, such networks present drawbacks, mainly because of limited sensor batteries and their vulnerability against physical attacks due to the lack of protection and security. Additionally, not all the sensors inside the network have the same responsibility in terms of traffic handling. In this paper, we firstly analyze the fact that some nodes are more <i>critical</i> than others, considering the most <i>critical node</i> the one that, once incapacitated, causes the most deterioration on the network performance. Such performance is analyzed using two metrics, namely network latency and lifetime. We present a result comparison between a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) model and a Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure (GRASP) meta-heuristic for small networks. For bigger networks, GRASP meta-heuristic results are presented to understand how the network degrades as the number of both <i>critical</i> and network nodes increase, by distributing them into two different areas: fixed and incremental to maintain node density.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/21/4564internet of thingsmipwsnilpoptimizationgraspmeta-heuristicslatencylifetime
spellingShingle David Sembroiz
Behnam Ojaghi
Davide Careglio
Sergio Ricciardi
A GRASP Meta-Heuristic for Evaluating the Latency and Lifetime Impact of Critical Nodes in Large Wireless Sensor Networks
Applied Sciences
internet of things
mip
wsn
ilp
optimization
grasp
meta-heuristics
latency
lifetime
title A GRASP Meta-Heuristic for Evaluating the Latency and Lifetime Impact of Critical Nodes in Large Wireless Sensor Networks
title_full A GRASP Meta-Heuristic for Evaluating the Latency and Lifetime Impact of Critical Nodes in Large Wireless Sensor Networks
title_fullStr A GRASP Meta-Heuristic for Evaluating the Latency and Lifetime Impact of Critical Nodes in Large Wireless Sensor Networks
title_full_unstemmed A GRASP Meta-Heuristic for Evaluating the Latency and Lifetime Impact of Critical Nodes in Large Wireless Sensor Networks
title_short A GRASP Meta-Heuristic for Evaluating the Latency and Lifetime Impact of Critical Nodes in Large Wireless Sensor Networks
title_sort grasp meta heuristic for evaluating the latency and lifetime impact of critical nodes in large wireless sensor networks
topic internet of things
mip
wsn
ilp
optimization
grasp
meta-heuristics
latency
lifetime
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/21/4564
work_keys_str_mv AT davidsembroiz agraspmetaheuristicforevaluatingthelatencyandlifetimeimpactofcriticalnodesinlargewirelesssensornetworks
AT behnamojaghi agraspmetaheuristicforevaluatingthelatencyandlifetimeimpactofcriticalnodesinlargewirelesssensornetworks
AT davidecareglio agraspmetaheuristicforevaluatingthelatencyandlifetimeimpactofcriticalnodesinlargewirelesssensornetworks
AT sergioricciardi agraspmetaheuristicforevaluatingthelatencyandlifetimeimpactofcriticalnodesinlargewirelesssensornetworks
AT davidsembroiz graspmetaheuristicforevaluatingthelatencyandlifetimeimpactofcriticalnodesinlargewirelesssensornetworks
AT behnamojaghi graspmetaheuristicforevaluatingthelatencyandlifetimeimpactofcriticalnodesinlargewirelesssensornetworks
AT davidecareglio graspmetaheuristicforevaluatingthelatencyandlifetimeimpactofcriticalnodesinlargewirelesssensornetworks
AT sergioricciardi graspmetaheuristicforevaluatingthelatencyandlifetimeimpactofcriticalnodesinlargewirelesssensornetworks